Suppr超能文献

通过观察进行学习:对调节因素以及观察诱导的安慰剂和反安慰剂效应在治疗结果上的影响进行系统探索。

Learning by observing: a systematic exploration of modulatory factors and the impact of observationally induced placebo and nocebo effects on treatment outcomes.

作者信息

Klauß Helena, Kunkel Angelika, Müßgens Diana, Haaker Jan, Bingel Ulrike

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro-and Behavioral Sciences (C-TNBS), University Medicine Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 18;15:1293975. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1293975. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Observational learning (OL) refers to learning through observing other people's behavior. OL has been suggested as an effective and simple tool to evoke treatment expectations and corresponding placebo and nocebo effects. However, the exact mechanisms by which OL shapes treatment outcomes, its moderating factors and possible areas of application remain unclear. We thus reviewed the existing literature with two different literature searches to answer the following questions: Which influencing factors contribute to OL-induced placebo and nocebo effects (in healthy volunteers and patients) and how large are these effects (search 1)? In which medical fields has OL been used so far to modulate treatment expectancy and treatment outcomes in patients, their caregivers, and at-risk groups (search 2)? We also aimed to explore whether and how the assessment of treatment expectations has been incorporated.

METHODS

We conducted two independent and comprehensive systematic literature searches, both carried out on September 20, 2022.

RESULTS

We identified 21 studies that investigated OL-mediated placebo and nocebo effects for pain and itch, the (placebo) efficacy of sham treatment on anxiety, and the (nocebo) induction of medication side effects (search 1). Studies showed that OL can efficiently induce placebo and nocebo effects across different presentation modes, with medium effect sizes on average: placebo effects,  = 0.79 (range:  = -0.36-1.58), nocebo effects,  = 0.61 (range:  = 0.04-1.5). Although several moderating factors have been investigated, their contribution to OL-induced effects remains unclear because of inconsistent results. Treatment expectation was assessed in only four studies. Regarding medical applications of OL (search 2), we found 12 studies. They showed that OL was effectively applied in preventive, therapeutic and rehabilitative interventions and that it was mainly used in the field of psychosomatics.

DISCUSSION

OL effects on treatment outcomes can be both positive and negative. Future research should investigate which individuals would benefit most from OL and how OL can be implemented most effectively to induce placebo and avoid nocebo effects in clinical settings.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This work was preregistered at the Center for Open Science as open-ended registration (doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/FVHKE). The protocol can be found here: https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-fvhke-v1.

摘要

引言

观察性学习(OL)是指通过观察他人的行为来学习。观察性学习已被认为是一种有效且简单的工具,可引发治疗期望以及相应的安慰剂和反安慰剂效应。然而,观察性学习塑造治疗结果的确切机制、其调节因素以及可能的应用领域仍不明确。因此,我们通过两次不同的文献检索回顾了现有文献,以回答以下问题:哪些影响因素会导致观察性学习引起的安慰剂和反安慰剂效应(在健康志愿者和患者中),以及这些效应有多大(检索1)?到目前为止,观察性学习在哪些医学领域被用于调节患者、其护理人员和高危人群的治疗期望和治疗结果(检索2)?我们还旨在探讨治疗期望的评估是否以及如何被纳入其中。

方法

我们于2022年9月20日进行了两项独立且全面的系统文献检索。

结果

我们确定了21项研究,这些研究调查了观察性学习介导的疼痛和瘙痒的安慰剂及反安慰剂效应、假治疗对焦虑的(安慰剂)疗效以及药物副作用的(反安慰剂)诱导作用(检索1)。研究表明,观察性学习能够在不同呈现模式下有效诱导安慰剂和反安慰剂效应,平均效应量中等:安慰剂效应,=0.79(范围:=-0.36至1.58),反安慰剂效应,=0.61(范围:=0.04至1.5)。尽管已经研究了几个调节因素,但由于结果不一致,它们对观察性学习诱导效应的贡献仍不明确。仅在四项研究中评估了治疗期望。关于观察性学习的医学应用(检索2),我们发现了12项研究。这些研究表明,观察性学习有效地应用于预防、治疗和康复干预,并且主要用于身心医学领域。

讨论

观察性学习对治疗结果的影响可能是积极的,也可能是消极的。未来的研究应调查哪些个体将从观察性学习中获益最大,以及如何在临床环境中最有效地实施观察性学习以诱导安慰剂效应并避免反安慰剂效应。

系统评价注册

这项工作在开放科学中心进行了预注册,作为开放式注册(doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/FVHKE)。方案可在此处找到:https://archive.org/details/osf-registrations-fvhke-v1。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bed/11064928/dda73327e6cd/fpsyg-15-1293975-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验