• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗期望问卷(TEX-Q):一种通用多维量表测量患者治疗期望的验证。

The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q): Validation of a generic multidimensional scale measuring patients' treatment expectations.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jan 23;18(1):e0280472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280472. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0280472
PMID:36689398
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9870103/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients' expectations, as a central mechanism behind placebo and nocebo effects, are an important predictor of health outcomes. Yet, theoretically based generic assessment tools allowing for an integrated understanding of expectations across conditions and treatments are lacking. Based on the preliminary 35-item version, this study reports the development and validation of the Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q), a generic, multidimensional self-report scale measuring patients' expectations of medical and psychological treatments.

METHODS

The TEX-Q was developed in a validation sample of n = 251 patients undergoing different treatments using exploratory factor analyses and item analyses, as well as analysis of convergent and divergent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted in an independent sample of n = 303 patients undergoing cancer treatment. Two-weeks test-retest reliability was assessed in n = 28 psychosomatic outpatients.

RESULTS

Factor analyses revealed six theoretically founded stable subscales. The TEX-Q assesses expectations of treatment benefit, positive impact, adverse events, negative impact, process and behavioural control with a total of 15 items. Results for the subscales and the sum score indicated good internal consistency (α = .71-.92), moderate to high test-retest reliability (r = .39-.76) as well as good convergent validity with regard to other expectation measures (r = .42-.58) and divergent validity with regard to measures of generalized expectations (r < .32) and psychopathology (r < .28).

CONCLUSIONS

While further validation is needed, the results suggest that the TEX-Q is a valid and reliable scale for the generic, multidimensional assessment of patients' treatment expectations. The TEX-Q overcomes constraints of ad-hoc and disease-specific scales, while allowing to compare the impact of different expectation constructs across conditions and treatments.

摘要

背景

患者的期望是安慰剂和反安慰剂效应的核心机制之一,是健康结果的重要预测指标。然而,缺乏基于理论的通用评估工具来综合理解各种情况下和各种治疗方法的期望。本研究基于初步的 35 项版本,报告了治疗期望问卷(TEX-Q)的开发和验证,这是一种通用的、多维的自我报告量表,用于测量患者对医疗和心理治疗的期望。

方法

TEX-Q 是在一个由 n = 251 名接受不同治疗的患者组成的验证样本中开发的,使用探索性因素分析和项目分析,以及分析收敛和发散效度。在一个接受癌症治疗的 n = 303 名患者的独立样本中进行了验证性因素分析。在 n = 28 名身心科门诊患者中评估了两周的重测信度。

结果

因素分析显示了六个基于理论的稳定子量表。TEX-Q 评估治疗获益、积极影响、不良事件、消极影响、过程和行为控制的期望,共 15 个项目。子量表和总分的结果表明,内部一致性良好(α =.71-.92),重测信度中等至高度(r =.39-.76),与其他期望测量(r =.42-.58)具有良好的收敛效度,与广义期望(r <.32)和精神病理学(r <.28)的测量具有良好的发散效度。

结论

虽然还需要进一步验证,但结果表明 TEX-Q 是一种有效的、可靠的通用量表,用于多维评估患者的治疗期望。TEX-Q 克服了特定疾病和特定疾病的量表的局限性,同时允许比较不同治疗方法中不同期望结构的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7834/9870103/113123650f32/pone.0280472.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7834/9870103/e2ac5f0632fd/pone.0280472.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7834/9870103/113123650f32/pone.0280472.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7834/9870103/e2ac5f0632fd/pone.0280472.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7834/9870103/113123650f32/pone.0280472.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q): Validation of a generic multidimensional scale measuring patients' treatment expectations.治疗期望问卷(TEX-Q):一种通用多维量表测量患者治疗期望的验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 23;18(1):e0280472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280472. eCollection 2023.
2
Development of the generic, multidimensional Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) through systematic literature review, expert surveys and qualitative interviews.通过系统文献回顾、专家调查和定性访谈开发通用多维治疗期望问卷(TEX-Q)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e036169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036169.
3
The Treatment Expectation Questionnaire Tool: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation in Turkey.治疗期望问卷工具:在土耳其的跨文化适应与心理测量学评估
Eval Health Prof. 2024 Jul 26:1632787241268211. doi: 10.1177/01632787241268211.
4
Assessment of treatment expectations in people with suspected endometriosis: A psychometric analysis.评估疑似子宫内膜异位症患者的治疗期望:心理测量学分析。
F1000Res. 2024 Sep 9;13:174. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.145377.2. eCollection 2024.
5
Development and validation of the Treatment Expectations in Chronic Pain Scale.治疗期望在慢性疼痛量表中的开发和验证。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 Sep;24(3):610-628. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12371. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
6
Assessment of patients' expectations: development and validation of the Expectation for Treatment Scale (ETS).患者期望评估:治疗期望量表(ETS)的编制与验证。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 17;9(6):e026712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026712.
7
Scoring and psychometric validation of the Perception of Anticoagulant Treatment Questionnaire (PACT-Q).抗凝治疗认知问卷(PACT-Q)的评分及心理测量学验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Apr 7;7:30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-30.
8
Impact of Alzheimer's Disease on Caregiver Questionnaire: internal consistency, convergent validity, and test-retest reliability of a new measure for assessing caregiver burden.阿尔茨海默病对照顾者问卷的影响:一种评估照顾者负担的新测量方法的内部一致性、收敛效度和重测信度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Sep 4;12:114. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0114-3.
9
Development and psychometric validation of the hospitalized patients' expectations for treatment scalepatient version.住院患者治疗期望量表患者版的编制与心理测量学验证
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 12;14:1201707. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1201707. eCollection 2023.
10
Crosscultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the New Knee Society Knee Scoring System.新版膝关节协会膝关节评分系统韩文版的跨文化调适与验证
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jun;475(6):1629-1639. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5307-8. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Study protocol of a pilot randomized controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation paired with reappraisal training for treatment of cannabis use disorder.一项关于经颅直流电刺激联合重新评估训练治疗大麻使用障碍的先导性随机对照试验的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 28;20(8):e0328205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328205. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring the Factors Related to Medication Adherence in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Based on Social Cognitive Theory: A Path Analysis.基于社会认知理论探讨类风湿关节炎患者药物依从性的相关因素:路径分析
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Aug 20;19:2565-2575. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S529952. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Optimizing Expectations About Endocrine Treatment for Breast Cancer: Results of the Randomized Controlled PSY-BREAST Trial.优化对乳腺癌内分泌治疗的期望:随机对照PSY-BREAST试验的结果
Clin Psychol Eur. 2020 Mar 31;2(1):e2695. doi: 10.32872/cpe.v2i1.2695. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
The effects of patients' expectations on surgery outcome in total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prognostic factor meta-analysis.患者期望对全髋关节和膝关节置换术手术结局的影响:预后因素荟萃分析。
Health Psychol Rev. 2022 Mar;16(1):50-66. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1854051. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
3
Development of the generic, multidimensional Treatment Expectation Questionnaire (TEX-Q) through systematic literature review, expert surveys and qualitative interviews.
Not so great expectations: The role of price and name information in the nocebo effect.
期望并非如此美好:价格和名称信息在反安慰剂效应中的作用。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2025 Jun 28;19:100630. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100630. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
Feasibility trial of a new digital training package to enhance primary care practitioners' communication of clinical empathy and realistic optimism.一项新的数字培训包的可行性试验,以增强初级保健从业者临床同理心和现实乐观主义的沟通能力。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 18;20(7):e0324649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324649. eCollection 2025.
5
Italian validation of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire in spinal pain: a useful tool for clinicians and physiotherapist (CEQ-I).意大利对脊柱疼痛可信度/预期问卷的验证:临床医生和物理治疗师的有用工具(CEQ-I)
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2025 Jun 21;16:20406223251324812. doi: 10.1177/20406223251324812. eCollection 2025.
6
Pre-operative expectations in patients with endometriosis - a qualitative interview study.子宫内膜异位症患者的术前期望——一项定性访谈研究
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Apr 28;25(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03686-3.
7
Optimized communication during risk disclosure to reduce nocebo headache after lumbar puncture-a study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.腰椎穿刺后风险告知过程中优化沟通以减少反安慰剂性头痛——一项随机对照临床试验的研究方案
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 26;16:1521978. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1521978. eCollection 2025.
8
Impact of an acute 1-month cannabidiol treatment on pain and inflammation after a long bone fracture: a triple-blind randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial protocol.急性1个月大麻二酚治疗对长骨骨折后疼痛和炎症的影响:一项三盲随机、安慰剂对照临床试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 20;15(2):e092919. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092919.
9
Assessment of psychosocial aspects in adults in post-COVID-19 condition: the EURONET-SOMA recommendations on core outcome domains for clinical and research use.新冠后成年人群心理社会因素评估:EURONET-SOMA关于临床与研究使用的核心结局领域建议
BMC Med. 2025 Feb 11;23(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03927-0.
10
What should constitute a control condition in psychedelic drug trials?在迷幻药试验中,什么应构成对照条件?
Nat Ment Health. 2024 Oct;2(10):1152-1160. doi: 10.1038/s44220-024-00321-2. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
通过系统文献回顾、专家调查和定性访谈开发通用多维治疗期望问卷(TEX-Q)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e036169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036169.
4
Assessment of patients' expectations: development and validation of the Expectation for Treatment Scale (ETS).患者期望评估:治疗期望量表(ETS)的编制与验证。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 17;9(6):e026712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026712.
5
Development and validation of the Treatment Expectations in Chronic Pain Scale.治疗期望在慢性疼痛量表中的开发和验证。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 Sep;24(3):610-628. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12371. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
6
Psychobiological Mechanisms of Placebo and Nocebo Effects: Pathways to Improve Treatments and Reduce Side Effects.安慰剂和反安慰剂效应的心理生物学机制:改善治疗方法和减少副作用的途径。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:599-625. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102907. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
7
Using Different Expectation Mechanisms to Optimize Treatment of Patients With Medical Conditions: A Systematic Review.利用不同的期望机制优化医疗条件患者的治疗:系统评价。
Psychosom Med. 2018 Jul/Aug;80(6):535-543. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000596.
8
Patients' Expectations Regarding Medical Treatment: A Critical Review of Concepts and Their Assessment.患者对医疗治疗的期望:概念及其评估的批判性综述
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:233. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00233. eCollection 2017.
9
Preoperative optimization of patient expectations improves long-term outcome in heart surgery patients: results of the randomized controlled PSY-HEART trial.术前优化患者期望可改善心脏手术患者的长期预后:随机对照PSY-HEART试验的结果
BMC Med. 2017 Jan 10;15(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0767-3.
10
Development and Validation of the EXPECT Questionnaire: Assessing Patient Expectations of Outcomes of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Treatments for Chronic Pain.EXPECT问卷的开发与验证:评估患者对慢性疼痛补充和替代医学治疗结果的期望
J Altern Complement Med. 2016 Nov;22(11):936-946. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0242. Epub 2016 Sep 30.