Yue Qi-Xuan, Ding Ruo-Fan, Chen Wei-Hao, Wu Lv-Ying, Liu Ke, Ji Zhi-Liang
State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
National Institute for Data Science in Health and Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 3;26:e48572. doi: 10.2196/48572.
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs), which are the phenotypic manifestations of clinical drug toxicity in humans, are a major concern in precision clinical medicine. A comprehensive evaluation of ADRs is helpful for unbiased supervision of marketed drugs and for discovering new drugs with high success rates.
In current practice, drug safety evaluation is often oversimplified to the occurrence or nonoccurrence of ADRs. Given the limitations of current qualitative methods, there is an urgent need for a quantitative evaluation model to improve pharmacovigilance and the accurate assessment of drug safety.
In this study, we developed a mathematical model, namely the Adverse Drug Reaction Classification System (ADReCS) severity-grading model, for the quantitative characterization of ADR severity, a crucial feature for evaluating the impact of ADRs on human health. The model was constructed by mining millions of real-world historical adverse drug event reports. A new parameter called Severity_score was introduced to measure the severity of ADRs, and upper and lower score boundaries were determined for 5 severity grades.
The ADReCS severity-grading model exhibited excellent consistency (99.22%) with the expert-grading system, the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Hence, we graded the severity of 6277 standard ADRs for 129,407 drug-ADR pairs. Moreover, we calculated the occurrence rates of 6272 distinct ADRs for 127,763 drug-ADR pairs in large patient populations by mining real-world medication prescriptions. With the quantitative features, we demonstrated example applications in systematically elucidating ADR mechanisms and thereby discovered a list of drugs with improper dosages.
In summary, this study represents the first comprehensive determination of both ADR severity grades and ADR frequencies. This endeavor establishes a strong foundation for future artificial intelligence applications in discovering new drugs with high efficacy and low toxicity. It also heralds a paradigm shift in clinical toxicity research, moving from qualitative description to quantitative evaluation.
药物不良反应(ADR)是临床药物毒性在人体的表型表现,是精准临床医学中的一个主要关注点。对ADR进行全面评估有助于对上市药物进行公正监管,并有助于发现成功率高的新药。
在当前实践中,药物安全性评估往往被过度简化为ADR的发生或未发生。鉴于当前定性方法的局限性,迫切需要一种定量评估模型来改善药物警戒和对药物安全性的准确评估。
在本研究中,我们开发了一种数学模型,即药物不良反应分类系统(ADReCS)严重程度分级模型,用于对ADR严重程度进行定量表征,这是评估ADR对人类健康影响的一个关键特征。该模型是通过挖掘数百万真实世界的历史药物不良事件报告构建的。引入了一个名为Severity_score的新参数来衡量ADR的严重程度,并为5个严重程度等级确定了分数上下限。
ADReCS严重程度分级模型与专家分级系统(不良事件通用术语标准)具有极好的一致性(99.22%)。因此,我们对129407对药物-ADR中的6277个标准ADR的严重程度进行了分级。此外,通过挖掘真实世界的用药处方,我们计算了127763对药物-ADR在大量患者群体中6272种不同ADR的发生率。利用这些定量特征,我们展示了在系统阐明ADR机制方面的示例应用,从而发现了一份剂量不当的药物清单。
总之,本研究首次全面确定了ADR严重程度等级和ADR频率。这一努力为未来人工智能在发现高效低毒新药方面的应用奠定了坚实基础。它还预示着临床毒性研究的范式转变,从定性描述转向定量评估。