Department of Neurology, James J. and Joan A. Gardner Family Center for Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Department of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;99(3):877-881. doi: 10.3233/JAD-240171.
Three recent anti-amyloid-β antibody trials for Alzheimer's disease reported similar effect sizes, used non-reactive saline as placebo, and showed large numbers of adverse events including imaging anomalies (ARIA) that correlate with cognitive changes. Conversely, all previous antibody trials were less reactive and pronounced ineffective. We argue that these observations point to unblinding bias, inflating apparent efficacy and thus altering the risk-benefit balance. Further, we highlight data demonstrating that beyond reducing amyloid, monoclonal antibodies increase monomeric amyloid-β42 in cerebrospinal fluid, which may explain potential benefits. We should recalibrate the efficacy of these antibodies and devote more resources into strategies beyond removing amyloid.
三项最近的阿尔茨海默病抗淀粉样蛋白-β抗体试验报告了相似的效果大小,使用非反应性盐水作为安慰剂,并显示出大量的不良事件,包括与认知变化相关的成像异常(ARIA)。相反,以前所有的抗体试验反应性较低,效果不明显。我们认为,这些观察结果指向了未设盲偏倚,夸大了明显的疗效,从而改变了风险效益平衡。此外,我们强调的数据表明,除了减少淀粉样蛋白外,单克隆抗体还会增加脑脊液中的单体淀粉样蛋白-β42,这可能解释了潜在的益处。我们应该重新校准这些抗体的疗效,并将更多资源投入到除淀粉样蛋白以外的策略中。