• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

时间在让癌症患者参与治疗决策中的作用:综述性研究。

The role of time in involving patients with cancer in treatment decision making: A scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain; Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Preventive Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Aug;125:108285. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108285. Epub 2024 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2024.108285
PMID:38701622
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Time is often perceived as a barrier to shared decision making in cancer care. It remains unclear how time functions as a barrier and how it could be most effectively utilized.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aimed to describe the role of time in patient involvement, and identify strategies to overcome time-related barriers.

METHODS

Seven databases were searched for any publications on patient involvement in cancer treatment decisions, focusing on how time is used to involve patients, the association between time and patient involvement, and/or strategies to overcome time-related barriers. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to select publications and extract data. One coder thematically analyzed data, a second coder checked these analyses.

RESULTS

The analysis of 26 eligible publications revealed four themes. Time was a resource 1) to process the diagnosis, 2) to obtain/process/consider information, 3) for patients and clinicians to spend together, and 4) for patient involvement in making decisions.

DISCUSSION

Time is a resource throughout the treatment decision-making process, and generic strategies have been proposed to overcome time constraints.

PRACTICE VALUE

Clinicians could co-create decision-making timelines with patients, spread decisions across several consultations, share written information with patients, and support healthcare redesigns that allocate the necessary time.

摘要

背景

时间常常被视为癌症护理中共同决策的障碍。目前尚不清楚时间如何成为障碍,以及如何最有效地利用时间。

目的

本范围综述旨在描述时间在患者参与中的作用,并确定克服与时间相关障碍的策略。

方法

在七个数据库中搜索了关于患者参与癌症治疗决策的任何出版物,重点关注如何利用时间来让患者参与,时间与患者参与之间的关联,以及/或克服与时间相关障碍的策略。审查员独立并重复工作以选择出版物和提取数据。一名编码员对数据进行主题分析,第二名编码员检查这些分析。

结果

对 26 篇合格出版物的分析揭示了四个主题。时间是一种资源 1)用于处理诊断,2)用于获取/处理/考虑信息,3)用于患者和临床医生一起度过,以及 4)用于患者参与决策。

讨论

时间是治疗决策过程中的一种资源,已经提出了通用策略来克服时间限制。

实践价值

临床医生可以与患者共同制定决策时间表,将决策分散在几次咨询中,与患者分享书面信息,并支持医疗保健重新设计,以分配必要的时间。

相似文献

1
The role of time in involving patients with cancer in treatment decision making: A scoping review.时间在让癌症患者参与治疗决策中的作用:综述性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Aug;125:108285. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108285. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
2
Engaging patients in health care decisions in the emergency department through shared decision-making: a systematic review.通过共同决策让患者参与急诊科的医疗决策:系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;19(8):959-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01414.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
3
A systematic review of the effectiveness of decision making interventions on increasing perceptions of shared decision making occurring in advanced cancer consultations.一项系统评价决策干预措施对增加高级癌症咨询中共同决策感知的有效性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2024 Jun;123:108235. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108235. Epub 2024 Mar 3.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Preferences on Treatment Decision Making in Sarcoma Patients: Prevalence and Associated Factors - Results from the PROSa Study.肉瘤患者治疗决策的偏好:患病率及相关因素——PROSa研究结果
Oncol Res Treat. 2025;48(4):174-185. doi: 10.1159/000543456. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
6
Patient Involvement in Shared Decision-Making: Do Patients Rate Physicians and Nurses Differently?患者参与共同决策:患者对医生和护士的评价是否不同?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;19(21):14229. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114229.
7
"I need to know what makes somebody tick …": Challenges and Strategies of Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Individualized Oncology.“我需要知道是什么在驱动着……”:个体化肿瘤学中实施共享决策的挑战与策略。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):555-562. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0615. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
8
Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: A systematic review and metasynthesis.癌症姑息治疗中的共同决策:系统评价和元综合。
Palliat Med. 2024 Apr;38(4):406-422. doi: 10.1177/02692163241238384. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
9
Shared Decision Making in Psoriasis: A Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies.银屑病中的共同决策:定量和定性研究的系统评价。
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019 Feb;20(1):13-29. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0390-5.
10
Shared decision-making performance of general practice residents: an observational study combining observer, resident, and patient perspectives.全科住院医师的共享决策表现:一项结合观察者、住院医师和患者视角的观察性研究。
Fam Pract. 2024 Feb 28;41(1):50-59. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad125.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors impacting informed decision-making for patients with pancreatic cancer: a qualitative study.影响胰腺癌患者知情决策的因素:一项定性研究
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 30;33(9):825. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09878-9.
2
Hoping Against Hope: Ethical Considerations when Trying Unproven Treatments for Seriously Ill Children.抱一线希望:为重症儿童尝试未经证实的治疗方法时的伦理考量。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2025 Feb 27;17(2):279-291. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00340-2. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
A qualitative exploration of factors that influence engagement with a digital mental health intervention for women with metastatic breast cancer: Finding My Way-Advanced.
对影响转移性乳腺癌女性参与数字心理健康干预“找到我的路-进阶版”的因素进行质性探索
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Mar 31;33(4):333. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09379-9.
4
Time toxicity in cancer care: A concept analysis using Walker and Avant's method.癌症护理中的时间毒性:运用沃克和阿凡特方法的概念分析
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Oct 23;11(12):100610. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100610. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
A Joanna Briggs Institute Framework Approach to Shared Decision Making in End-of-Life.乔安娜·布里格斯研究所终末期共享决策框架方法
Health Expect. 2024 Oct;27(5):e70041. doi: 10.1111/hex.70041.