Department of Medical Education, Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Center for Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Med Educ. 2024 Nov;58(11):1343-1349. doi: 10.1111/medu.15400. Epub 2024 May 4.
Much of the literature on harm and injustice in medical education focuses on the impact of oppression rather than trainees' efforts to create change. To acknowledge and make visible these efforts, medical education professionals must grasp how trainees perceive resistance and their role in effecting change. Employing functional linguistic and 'everyday' resistance theories, this critical qualitative study aims to understand trainees' conceptions of resistance practices and their representational choices in moments when they talked about and conceptualised resistance.
Gathering participants through professional networks and snowball sampling, this study employed in-depth interviews to explore the conceptualisations of resistance among North American medical trainees (9 medical students, 9 residents and fellows). With the use of an applied functional linguistic analysis framework, we analysed the representational metafunction in trainees' conceptualisation of their resistance efforts against social injustice. We began with open coding for 'everyday' acts of resistance and then shifted to focused coding on verbal process types in participants' language to characterise their conceptualisations of resistance.
Participants conceptualised their resistance practices in three distinct ways: first, an almost physical pushing back, drawing largely on material process types (doing); second, an embodied standing up and being present, based predominantly on material and relational process types (being); and third, an epistemic bringing to light, grounded mostly in mental and verbal process types (thinking). These processes of resistance reflect participants' conceptualisations of their efforts to challenge the status quo around inequity, harm and injustice in medical education.
This study builds on resistance literature, offering a potential typology of resistance practices as pushing back, being and bringing to light. Because these are 'everyday' acts of resistance, these are tactics available to everyone, including faculty; we all have the power to resist, whether it is in teaching and learning or interacting with larger structures in medicine.
医学教育领域的许多关于伤害和不公正的文献都集中在压迫的影响上,而不是学员们努力改变的情况。为了承认和突显这些努力,医学教育专业人员必须理解学员如何看待抵抗以及他们在实施变革中的作用。本批判性定性研究采用功能语言学和“日常”抵抗理论,旨在了解学员对抵抗实践的概念理解以及他们在谈论和概念化抵抗时的代表性选择。
通过专业网络和滚雪球抽样收集参与者,本研究采用深入访谈来探索北美医学学员(9 名医学生、9 名住院医师和研究员)对抵抗概念的理解。我们使用应用功能语言学分析框架,分析了学员在描述社会不公正方面抵抗努力的代表性元功能。我们首先对“日常”抵抗行为进行开放式编码,然后将重点转移到参与者语言中动词过程类型的聚焦编码上,以描述他们对抵抗的概念理解。
参与者以三种截然不同的方式概念化他们的抵抗实践:首先,几乎是身体上的反抗,主要利用物质过程类型(做);其次,是一种体现出来的存在和在场,主要基于物质和关系过程类型(是);最后,是一种知识上的揭示,主要基于心理和言语过程类型(思考)。这些抵抗过程反映了参与者对挑战医学教育中不平等、伤害和不公正现状的努力的概念理解。
本研究扩展了抵抗文献,提供了一种潜在的抵抗实践分类法,即反抗、存在和揭示。由于这些是“日常”的抵抗行为,这些策略可供所有人使用,包括教师;我们都有抵抗的力量,无论是在教学和学习中,还是与医学中的更大结构互动。