Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, 322 Seoyang-ro, Hwasun-eup, Hwasun-gun, Jeonnam, 58128, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Chosun University College of Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, 61452, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2024 May 4;14(1):10288. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60881-2.
Ultrasonography (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the primary modality for evaluating thyroid nodules. However, in cases of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS), supplemental tests are necessary for a definitive diagnosis. Accordingly, we aimed to develop a non-invasive quantification software using the heterogeneity scores of thyroid nodules. This cross-sectional study retrospectively enrolled 188 patients who were categorized into four groups according to their diagnostic classification in the Bethesda system and surgical pathology [II-benign (B) (n = 24); III-B (n = 52); III-malignant (M) (n = 54); V/VI-M (n = 58)]. Heterogeneity scores were derived using an image pixel-based heterogeneity index, utilized as a coefficient of variation (CV) value, and analyzed across all US images. Differences in heterogeneity scores were compared using one-way analysis of variance with Tukey's test. Diagnostic accuracy was determined by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. The results of this study indicated significant differences in mean heterogeneity scores between benign and malignant thyroid nodules, except in the comparison between III-M and V/VI-M nodules. Among malignant nodules, the Bethesda classification was not observed to be associated with mean heterogeneity scores. Moreover, there was a positive correlation between heterogeneity scores and the combined diagnostic category, which was based on the Bethesda system and surgical cytology grades (R = 0.639, p < 0.001). AUROC for heterogeneity scores showed the highest diagnostic performance (0.818; cut-off: 30.22% CV value) for differentiating the benign group (normal/II-B/III-B) from the malignant group (III-M/V&VI-M), with a diagnostic accuracy of 72.5% (161/122). Quantitative heterogeneity measurement of US images is a valuable non-invasive diagnostic tool for predicting the likelihood of malignancy in thyroid nodules, including AUS or FLUS.
超声引导下细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)是评估甲状腺结节的主要方法。然而,在不典型意义不确定(AUS)或滤泡性病变不确定意义(FLUS)的情况下,需要补充检查以明确诊断。因此,我们旨在使用甲状腺结节的异质性评分开发一种非侵入性的量化软件。这项横断面研究回顾性纳入了 188 名患者,根据其在 Bethesda 系统和手术病理学中的诊断分类分为四组[II-良性(B)(n=24);III-B(n=52);III-恶性(M)(n=54);V/VI-M(n=58)]。异质性评分是通过基于图像像素的异质性指数得出的,用作变异系数(CV)值,并在所有 US 图像上进行分析。使用方差分析和 Tukey 检验比较异质性评分的差异。通过计算接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积来确定诊断准确性。该研究结果表明,良性和恶性甲状腺结节之间的平均异质性评分存在显著差异,除了 III-M 和 V/VI-M 结节之间的比较。在恶性结节中,Bethesda 分类与平均异质性评分无关。此外,异质性评分与基于 Bethesda 系统和手术细胞学分级的联合诊断类别之间存在正相关(R=0.639,p<0.001)。异质性评分的 ROC 曲线显示,用于区分良性组(正常/II-B/III-B)和恶性组(III-M/V&VI-M)的诊断性能最高(0.818;截断值:30.22% CV 值),诊断准确率为 72.5%(161/122)。超声图像的定量异质性测量是一种有价值的非侵入性诊断工具,可用于预测甲状腺结节恶性的可能性,包括 AUS 或 FLUS。