Department of Blood Transfusion, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China; School Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Department of Medical, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 May 4;79:100379. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100379. eCollection 2024.
The association of blood transfusion with an increase in medium- and short-term mortality in specific populations has been confirmed. However, the correlation between blood transfusion and long-term mortality in the general population remains unclear. This cohort study evaluated the correlation between blood transfusion and overall and cause-specific mortality in the general American adult population.
The authors utilized 10 sets of 2-year cycle data (1999-2018) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey on the outcomes of adults who did and did not receive blood transfusions. Propensity score-matching (1:1) was performed based on age, sex, race, education level, marital status, poverty-income ratio, arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease, cancer, anemia, hypertension, and diabetes status. After controlling for demographic characteristics and clinical risk factors, Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the correlation between blood transfusion and all-cause and cause-specific mortality.
The study included 48,004 adult participants. The risk of all-cause mortality increased by 101 % with blood transfusion, and the risk of cardiovascular mortality increased by 165 %. After propensity score-matching, 6,116 pairs of cases were retained, and the risk of all-cause mortality increased by 84 % with blood transfusion, and the risk of cardiovascular mortality increased by 137 %. The sensitivity analysis results were robust.
In the general American population, blood transfusion significantly impacts long-term all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and may be an unacknowledged risk factor for death. Thus, the effective management of blood transfusion in the general population may be beneficial.
已有研究证实,在某些特定人群中,输血与中短期死亡率的增加相关。然而,输血与普通人群长期死亡率之间的相关性尚不清楚。本队列研究评估了输血与普通美国成年人群体的全因死亡率和死因特异性死亡率之间的相关性。
作者利用了国家健康和营养检查调查(1999-2018 年)中 10 组每两年一个周期的数据,研究了接受和未接受输血的成年人的结局。根据年龄、性别、种族、教育程度、婚姻状况、贫困收入比、动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病、癌症、贫血、高血压和糖尿病状况,进行了倾向评分匹配(1:1)。在控制人口统计学特征和临床风险因素后,采用 Cox 回归分析评估了输血与全因死亡率和死因特异性死亡率之间的相关性。
本研究纳入了 48004 名成年参与者。输血使全因死亡率的风险增加了 101%,心血管死亡率的风险增加了 165%。在倾向评分匹配后,保留了 6116 对病例,输血使全因死亡率的风险增加了 84%,心血管死亡率的风险增加了 137%。敏感性分析结果稳健。
在普通美国人群中,输血显著影响长期全因和心血管死亡率,可能是一个未被认识到的死亡风险因素。因此,对普通人群进行有效的输血管理可能是有益的。