Suppr超能文献

弗拉芒女性健康行为的经典指标与避孕选择之间的关系。

Relationship between classic indicators of health behaviour and contraceptive choices in women in Flanders.

机构信息

Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium.

Centre for Population, Family & Health, Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Womens Health. 2024 May 5;24(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03079-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this study we shed light on ongoing trends in contraceptive use in Flanders (Belgium). Building on the fundamental cause theory and social diffusion of innovation theory, we examine socio-economic gradients in contraceptive use and the relationship to health behaviours.

METHODS

Using the unique and recently collected (2020) ISALA data, we used multinomial logistic regression to model the uptake of contraceptives and its association to educational level and health behaviour (N:4316 women).

RESULTS

Higher educated women, and women with a healthy lifestyle especially, tend to use non-hormonal contraceptives or perceived lower-dosage hormonal contraceptives that are still trustworthy from a medical point of view. Moreover, we identified a potentially vulnerable group in terms of health as our results indicate that women who do not engage in preventive health behaviours are more likely to use no, or no modern, contraceptive method.

DISCUSSION

The fact that higher educated women and women with a healthy lifestyle are less likely to use hormonal contraceptive methods is in line with patient empowerment, as women no longer necessarily follow recommendations by healthcare professionals, and there is a growing demand for naturalness in Western societies.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study can therefore be used to inform policy makers and reproductive healthcare professionals, since up-to-date understanding of women's contraceptive choices is clearly needed in order to develop effective strategies to prevent sexually transmitted infections and unplanned pregnancies, and in which women can take control over their sexuality and fertility in a comfortable and pleasurable way.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在揭示佛兰德斯(比利时)当前避孕措施的使用趋势。本研究基于基本原因理论和社会创新扩散理论,考察了避孕措施的社会经济梯度差异及其与健康行为的关系。

方法

利用独特且最新(2020 年)收集的 ISALA 数据,我们使用多项逻辑回归模型来分析避孕措施的采用情况及其与教育水平和健康行为的关联(N=4316 名女性)。

结果

受过高等教育的女性,尤其是生活方式健康的女性,更倾向于使用非激素避孕药或被认为具有较低激素剂量但仍值得信赖的避孕药。此外,我们还确定了一个潜在的脆弱健康群体,因为我们的研究结果表明,不参与预防性健康行为的女性更有可能不使用任何避孕方法或使用非现代避孕方法。

讨论

受教育程度较高的女性和生活方式健康的女性不太可能使用激素避孕方法,这与患者赋权的理念是一致的,因为女性不再盲目遵循医疗保健专业人员的建议,而且在西方社会中,对自然的需求也在不断增长。

结论

因此,本研究结果可用于为政策制定者和生殖健康护理专业人员提供信息,因为为了制定有效的策略来预防性传播感染和意外怀孕,以及让女性能够以舒适和愉悦的方式控制自己的性和生育能力,显然需要了解女性避孕选择的最新情况。

相似文献

1
Relationship between classic indicators of health behaviour and contraceptive choices in women in Flanders.
BMC Womens Health. 2024 May 5;24(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03079-y.
2
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0.
3
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.
5
Young Women's Complex Patterns of Contraceptive Use: Findings from an Australian Cohort Study.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Sep;52(3):181-190. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12158.
9
Women's Contraceptive Preference-Use Mismatch.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Jun;26(6):692-701. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5807. Epub 2016 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

1
A citizen-science-enabled catalogue of the vaginal microbiome and associated factors.
Nat Microbiol. 2023 Nov;8(11):2183-2195. doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01500-0. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
2
Associations between health-risk behaviours and non-condom use among 28,620 Danish students: a cross-sectional study.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2022 Feb;27(1):45-52. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2021.2005018. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
3
Reasons for rejecting hormonal contraception in Western countries: A systematic review.
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Sep;284:114247. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114247. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
4
Natural Cycles app: contraceptive outcomes and demographic analysis of UK users.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021 Apr;26(2):105-110. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2020.1867844. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Contraceptive Effectiveness of an FDA-Cleared Birth Control App: Results from the Natural Cycles U.S. Cohort.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Jun;30(6):782-788. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8547. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
6
The French pill scare and the reshaping of social inequalities in access to medical contraceptives.
SSM Popul Health. 2020 May 28;11:100606. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100606. eCollection 2020 Aug.
7
Contraceptive Autonomy: Conceptions and Measurement of a Novel Family Planning Indicator.
Stud Fam Plann. 2020 Jun;51(2):161-176. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12114. Epub 2020 May 1.
8
'It's just a very personal thing': contraceptive influences and decision making among women living in Italy.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019 Jun;24(3):198-205. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1615616. Epub 2019 May 21.
9
Perfect- and typical-use effectiveness of the Dot fertility app over 13 cycles: results from a prospective contraceptive effectiveness trial.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019 Apr;24(2):148-153. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1581164. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
"We have to be mythbusters": Clinician attitudes about the legitimacy of patient concerns and dissatisfaction with contraception.
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Sep;212:145-152. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.020. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验