• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三项前瞻性案例研究,考察米非司酮在难治性创伤后应激障碍患者中的疗效。

Three Prospective Case Studies Examining Mifepristone's Efficacy in Patients with Treatment-Resistant PTSD.

作者信息

van Minnen Agnes, Vos Lizelotte, Bet Pierre M, de Jongh Ad, Linsen Felix, van Marle Hein J F, Meijer Onno C, Otte Willem M, Russcher Marije, Vinkers Christiaan H

机构信息

Psychotrauma Expertise Centre (PSYTREC) Bilthoven, Bilthoven, Netherlands.

Behavioural Science Institute (BSI), Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Case Rep Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 26;2024:4768647. doi: 10.1155/2024/4768647. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1155/2024/4768647
PMID:38706512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11068447/
Abstract

Despite the availability of various treatment approaches for patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), some patients do not respond to these therapies, and novel treatment approaches are needed. This study investigated the efficacy of mifepristone, a glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, in treatment-resistant PTSD patients. Three patients with PTSD who were resistant to standard psychological and pharmacological treatments were prescribed mifepristone (600-1,200 mg/day) for 1 week. A baseline-controlled single-case design was used, involving a 2-week baseline phase (no intervention), a 1-week intervention phase (mifepristone), and a 2-week postintervention phase. The primary outcome measure, self-reported PTSD symptom severity (PCL-5), was assessed daily, with participants providing their own control condition. Two of the three patients experienced a significant reduction in PTSD symptom severity after the intervention phase and no longer met the diagnostic criteria for PTSD. These positive results were maintained during long-term follow-up. These findings support the potential effectiveness of mifepristone in the treatment of patients with treatment-resistant PTSD. However, our findings must be interpreted with caution, and further studies with larger sample sizes and more rigorous designs are necessary to confirm the promising results.

摘要

尽管有多种治疗方法可用于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者,但一些患者对这些疗法没有反应,因此需要新的治疗方法。本研究调查了糖皮质激素受体拮抗剂米非司酮对难治性PTSD患者的疗效。三名对标准心理和药物治疗有抵抗性的PTSD患者服用米非司酮(600 - 1200毫克/天),为期1周。采用基线对照单病例设计,包括2周的基线期(无干预)、1周的干预期(米非司酮)和2周的干预后期。主要结局指标为自我报告的PTSD症状严重程度(PCL - 5),每天进行评估,参与者提供自身的对照情况。三名患者中有两名在干预期后PTSD症状严重程度显著降低,不再符合PTSD的诊断标准。这些积极结果在长期随访中得以维持。这些发现支持了米非司酮治疗难治性PTSD患者的潜在有效性。然而,我们的发现必须谨慎解读,需要进行更大样本量和更严格设计的进一步研究来证实这些有前景的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad79/11068447/d53a28185667/CRIPS2024-4768647.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad79/11068447/68fcc74ed41d/CRIPS2024-4768647.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad79/11068447/d53a28185667/CRIPS2024-4768647.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad79/11068447/68fcc74ed41d/CRIPS2024-4768647.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad79/11068447/d53a28185667/CRIPS2024-4768647.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Three Prospective Case Studies Examining Mifepristone's Efficacy in Patients with Treatment-Resistant PTSD.三项前瞻性案例研究,考察米非司酮在难治性创伤后应激障碍患者中的疗效。
Case Rep Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 26;2024:4768647. doi: 10.1155/2024/4768647. eCollection 2024.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Mifepristone in the Treatment of Male US Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial.米非司酮治疗男性美国退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的疗效和安全性:一项 2a 期随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2310223. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10223.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
A five-day inpatient EMDR treatment programme for PTSD: pilot study.一项针对创伤后应激障碍的为期五天的住院眼动脱敏再处理治疗方案:初步研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Feb 5;9(1):1425575. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2018.1425575. eCollection 2018.
5
Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well-being of torture survivors.针对酷刑幸存者心理健康和福祉的心理、社会及福利干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 11;2014(11):CD009317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009317.pub2.
6
A Pilot Study of Mifepristone in Combat-Related PTSD.米非司酮治疗与战斗相关创伤后应激障碍的初步研究。
Depress Res Treat. 2012;2012:393251. doi: 10.1155/2012/393251. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
7
[Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a consequence of the interaction between an individual genetic susceptibility, a traumatogenic event and a social context].[创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)作为个体遗传易感性、创伤性事件和社会环境之间相互作用的结果]
Encephale. 2012 Oct;38(5):373-80. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
8
Effect of Written Exposure Therapy vs Cognitive Processing Therapy on Increasing Treatment Efficiency Among Military Service Members With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.书面暴露疗法与认知加工疗法对提高创伤后应激障碍军人治疗效率的影响:一项随机非劣效性试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2140911. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40911.
9
Cortisol augmentation of a psychological treatment for warfighters with posttraumatic stress disorder: Randomized trial showing improved treatment retention and outcome.皮质醇增强心理治疗对患有创伤后应激障碍的战士的疗效:随机试验表明治疗依从性和治疗效果得到改善。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015 Jan;51:589-97. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
10
Combat and Operational Stress Control Interventions and PTSD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.战斗和作战应激控制干预与 PTSD:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Mil Med. 2022 Jul 1;187(7-8):e846-e855. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usab310.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Mifepristone in the Treatment of Male US Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial.米非司酮治疗男性美国退伍军人创伤后应激障碍的疗效和安全性:一项 2a 期随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2310223. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10223.
2
Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A State-of-the-art Review.创伤后应激障碍的治疗:最新综述。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2024;22(4):557-635. doi: 10.2174/1570159X21666230428091433.
3
Veterans receiving a second course of cognitive processing therapy or prolonged exposure therapy: is it better to switch or stay the same?
接受第二轮认知加工疗法或延长暴露疗法的退伍军人:更换疗法还是维持原疗法更好?
Cogn Behav Ther. 2022 Nov;51(6):456-469. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2022.2058996. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
4
Pharmacological therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis of monotherapy, augmentation and head-to-head approaches.创伤后应激障碍的药物治疗:单药治疗、增效治疗和头对头治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Jan 26;12(1):1802920. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1802920. eCollection 2021.
5
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.成人创伤后应激障碍的心理治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Mar 10;11(1):1729633. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1729633. eCollection 2020.
6
Late glucocorticoid receptor antagonism changes the outcome of adult life stress.晚期糖皮质激素受体拮抗作用改变成年生活应激的结果。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019 Sep;107:169-178. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Development and Evaluation of the Dutch Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5).荷兰版《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第5版临床医生管理的创伤后应激障碍量表(CAPS-5)的开发与评估
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Nov 22;9(1):1546085. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2018.1546085. eCollection 2018.
8
Resetting the Stress System with a Mifepristone Challenge.米非司酮挑战重置应激系统。
Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2019 May;39(4):503-522. doi: 10.1007/s10571-018-0614-5. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
9
Defining Treatment-Resistant Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Framework for Future Research.定义难治性创伤后应激障碍:未来研究的框架
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 1;84(5):e37-e41. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
10
Combined Analysis of Mifepristone for Psychotic Depression: Plasma Levels Associated With Clinical Response.米非司酮联合治疗精神病性抑郁症:与临床反应相关的血浆水平分析。
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;84(1):46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.