Siewert Julia, Teut Michael, Brinkhaus Benno, Fisch Silvia, Kummer Sonja
Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Psychotherapie-Praxis Kupferstraße, Coesfeld, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 19;15:1363037. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1363037. eCollection 2024.
There is evidence that patients' positive outcome expectations prior to study interventions are associated with better treatment outcomes. Nevertheless, to date, only few studies have investigated whether individual outcome expectations affect treatment outcomes in hypnosis.
To examine whether outcome expectations to hypnosis prior to starting treatment were able to predict perceived stress, as measured on a visual analog scale (VAS), after 5 weeks.
We performed a secondary data analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial of intervention group participants only. Study participants with stress symptoms were randomized to 5 weekly sessions of a group hypnosis program for stress reduction and improved stress coping, plus 5 hypnosis audio recordings for further individual practice at home, as well as an educational booklet on coping with stress. Perceived stress for the following week was measured at baseline and after 5 weeks using a visual analog scale (0-100 mm; VAS). Hypnosis outcome expectations were assessed at baseline only with the Expectations for Treatment Scale (ETS). Unadjusted and adjusted linear regressions were performed to examine the association between baseline expectations and perceived stress at 5 weeks.
Data from 47 participants (M = 45.02, SD = 13.40 years; 85.1% female) were analyzed. Unadjusted (B = 0.326, = 0.239, = 0.812, = 0.001) and adjusted (B = 0.639, = 0.470, = 0.641, = 0.168) linear regressions found that outcome expectations to hypnosis were not associated with a change in perceived stress between baseline and after 5 weeks in the intervention group.
Our findings suggest that the beneficial effect of group hypnosis in distressed participants were not associated with outcome expectations. Other mechanisms of action may be more important for the effect of hypnosis, which should be explored in future research.: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03525093.
有证据表明,患者在研究干预之前的积极结果期望与更好的治疗结果相关。然而,迄今为止,只有少数研究调查了个体结果期望是否会影响催眠治疗的结果。
研究开始治疗前对催眠的结果期望是否能够预测5周后通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量的感知压力。
我们仅对一项多中心随机对照试验的干预组参与者进行了二次数据分析。有压力症状的研究参与者被随机分配到为期5周的团体催眠减压和改善压力应对计划中,每周进行一次,另外还有5份催眠音频记录供在家中进一步个人练习,以及一本关于应对压力的教育手册。在基线和5周后使用视觉模拟量表(0-100毫米;VAS)测量下一周的感知压力。仅在基线时使用治疗期望量表(ETS)评估催眠结果期望。进行未调整和调整后的线性回归,以检查基线期望与5周时感知压力之间的关联。
分析了47名参与者的数据(M = 45.02,SD = 13.40岁;85.1%为女性)。未调整(B = 0.326, = 0.239, = 0.812, = 0.001)和调整后(B = 0.639, = 0.470, = 0.641, = 0.168)的线性回归发现,干预组中对催眠的结果期望与基线和5周后感知压力的变化无关。
我们的研究结果表明,团体催眠对有困扰的参与者的有益效果与结果期望无关。其他作用机制可能对催眠效果更重要,这应在未来的研究中进行探索。:ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符NCT03525093。