• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西一项回顾性队列研究:11588 例中心静脉置管相关深静脉血栓形成的风险。

Risk of deep venous thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheter: A retrospective cohort study of 11.588 catheters in Brazil.

机构信息

Department Nursing Specialized in Vascular Access, RN, MD. Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Adjunct Professor at the Federal University of Viçosa, RN, PhD. Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 May 6;19(5):e0300425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300425. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0300425
PMID:38709807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11073680/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) due to Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) is one of the most threatening complications after device insertion.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the rate of PICC-associated DVT and analyze the risk factors associated with this event in cancer and critically ill patients.

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive, retrospective cohort study with 11,588 PICCs from December 2014 to December 2019. Patients ≥ 18 years receiving a PICC were included. Pre-and post-puncture variables were collected and a logistic regression was used to identify the independent factors associated with the risk of DVT.

RESULTS

The DVT prevalence was 1.8% (n = 213). The median length of PICC use was 15.3 days. The median age was 75 years (18; 107) and 52% were men, 53.5% were critically ill and 29.1% oncological patients. The most common indications for PICC's were intravenous antibiotics (79.1%). Notably, 91.5% of PICC showed a catheter-to-vein ratio of no more than 33%. The tip location method with intracavitary electrocardiogram was used in 43%. Most catheters (67.9%) were electively removed at the end of intravenous therapy. After adjusting for cancer profile ou chemotherapy, regression anaysis revealed that age (OR 1.011; 95% CI 1.002-1.020), previous DVT (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.12-3.44) and obstruction of the device (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.05-2.42) were independent factors associated with PICC-associated DVT, whereas the use of an anticoagulant regimen was a protective variable (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.54-0.99).

CONCLUSION

PICC is a safe and suitable intravenous device for medium and long-term therapy, with low rates of DVT even in a cohort of critically ill and cancer patients.

摘要

介绍

外周静脉置入中心静脉导管(PICC)相关的深静脉血栓(DVT)是置管后最具威胁性的并发症之一。

目的

评估 PICC 相关 DVT 的发生率,并分析癌症和重症患者中与该事件相关的危险因素。

方法

我们进行了一项描述性、回顾性队列研究,纳入了 2014 年 12 月至 2019 年 12 月期间的 11588 例 PICC。纳入接受 PICC 的年龄≥18 岁的患者。收集置管前后的变量,并采用逻辑回归分析确定与 DVT 风险相关的独立因素。

结果

DVT 的患病率为 1.8%(n=213)。PICC 使用的中位时间为 15.3 天。中位年龄为 75 岁(18-107 岁),52%为男性,53.5%为重症患者,29.1%为癌症患者。PICC 最常见的适应证为静脉内抗生素(79.1%)。值得注意的是,91.5%的 PICC 导管-静脉比不超过 33%。腔内心电图引导的尖端定位方法使用率为 43%。大多数导管(67.9%)在静脉治疗结束时选择性拔出。在调整癌症特征或化疗后,回归分析显示,年龄(OR 1.011;95%CI 1.002-1.020)、既往 DVT(OR 1.96;95%CI 1.12-3.44)和导管阻塞(OR 1.60;95%CI 1.05-2.42)是与 PICC 相关 DVT 相关的独立因素,而抗凝方案的使用是保护变量(OR 0.73;95%CI 0.54-0.99)。

结论

PICC 是一种安全且适合中、长期治疗的静脉装置,即使在重症和癌症患者中,DVT 的发生率也较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b87c/11073680/51d993fee19d/pone.0300425.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b87c/11073680/71352d50b1b3/pone.0300425.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b87c/11073680/51d993fee19d/pone.0300425.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b87c/11073680/71352d50b1b3/pone.0300425.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b87c/11073680/51d993fee19d/pone.0300425.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk of deep venous thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheter: A retrospective cohort study of 11.588 catheters in Brazil.巴西一项回顾性队列研究:11588 例中心静脉置管相关深静脉血栓形成的风险。
PLoS One. 2024 May 6;19(5):e0300425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300425. eCollection 2024.
2
Incidence and risk factors of superficial and deep vein thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in children.儿童外周置入中心静脉导管相关的浅静脉和深静脉血栓形成的发生率和危险因素。
J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Nov;14(11):2158-2168. doi: 10.1111/jth.13478. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
3
Patterns and risk factors of peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related symptomatic thrombosis events in patients with malignant tumors receiving chemotherapy.肿瘤化疗患者经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管相关症状性血栓事件的发生模式和危险因素。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Nov;8(6):919-929. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
4
Peripherally inserted central catheter-related deep vein thrombosis: contemporary patterns and predictors.经外周插入中心静脉导管相关的深静脉血栓形成:当代的模式和预测因素。
J Thromb Haemost. 2014 Jun;12(6):847-54. doi: 10.1111/jth.12549.
5
Quality improvement initiative to reduce deep vein thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in adults with cystic fibrosis.改善成年囊性纤维化患者外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管相关深静脉血栓形成的质量改进措施。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Nov;11(9):1404-10. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201404-175OC.
6
Peripherally inserted central catheter usage patterns and associated symptomatic upper extremity venous thrombosis.外周置入中心静脉导管使用模式与相关的症状性上肢静脉血栓形成。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Mar;55(3):761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.005.
7
Risk of symptomatic DVT associated with peripherally inserted central catheters.与外周静脉置入中心静脉导管相关的有症状 DVT 风险。
Chest. 2010 Oct;138(4):803-10. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0154.
8
Patterns of use and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A multicenter study.住院固体肿瘤患者中经外周插入中心静脉导管的使用模式和结局:一项多中心研究。
Cancer. 2022 Oct;128(20):3681-3690. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34410. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
9
The Michigan Risk Score to predict peripherally inserted central catheter-associated thrombosis.密歇根风险评分预测外周静脉置入中心静脉导管相关性血栓。
J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Oct;15(10):1951-1962. doi: 10.1111/jth.13794. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
10
Peripherally inserted central venous catheters and central venous catheters related thrombosis in post-critical patients.经外周置入的中心静脉导管和危重症后患者相关的中心静脉导管血栓形成。
Intensive Care Med. 2011 Feb;37(2):284-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2043-x. Epub 2010 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Peripherally inserted central catheters can be an alternative to tunneled central venous catheters in chemotherapy for hematological and oncological pediatric patients.外周置入的中心静脉导管可作为血液肿瘤儿科患者化疗时替代隧道式中心静脉导管的选择。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2023 Sep 6;39(1):264. doi: 10.1007/s00383-023-05545-4.
2
Symptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis Associated With Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters of Different Diameters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.不同直径外周置入中心静脉导管与症状性深静脉血栓形成的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296221144041. doi: 10.1177/10760296221144041.
3
A comparison between two radiological criteria for verifying tip location of central venous catheters.
两种用于验证中心静脉导管尖端位置的放射学标准的比较。
J Vasc Access. 2024 Mar;25(2):551-556. doi: 10.1177/11297298221126818. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
4
The SIP protocol update: Eight strategies, incorporating Rapid Peripheral Vein Assessment (RaPeVA), to minimize complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheter insertion.SIP 协议更新:八项策略,包括快速外周静脉评估(RaPeVA),以尽量减少与外周静脉中心置管相关的并发症。
J Vasc Access. 2024 Jan;25(1):5-13. doi: 10.1177/11297298221099838. Epub 2022 May 27.
5
Patterns, appropriateness and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheter use in Brazil: a multicentre study of 12 725 catheters.巴西外周置入中心静脉导管使用的模式、适宜性和结局:一项涉及 12725 根导管的多中心研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Sep;31(9):652-661. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013869. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
6
Use of peripherally inserted central catheters in ICU patients: We need to put in balance the important risks versus the potential advantages!重症监护病房患者使用外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管:我们需要权衡重要的风险与潜在的益处!
J Crit Care. 2021 Dec;66:184-185. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.06.023. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
7
Vascular Access Device Care and Management: A Comprehensive Organizational Approach.血管通路装置的护理与管理:全面的组织方法。
J Infus Nurs. 2020 Sep/Oct;43(5):246-254. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000385.
8
Reconsidering the GAVeCeLT Consensus on catheter-related thrombosis, 13 years later.十三年后重新审视导管相关性血栓形成的 GAVeCeLT 共识。
J Vasc Access. 2021 Jul;22(4):501-508. doi: 10.1177/1129729820947594. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
9
Peripherally inserted central catheter-related thrombosis rate in modern vascular access era-when insertion technique matters: A systematic review and meta-analysis.现代血管通路时代外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管相关血栓形成率——插入技术的重要性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Vasc Access. 2020 Jan;21(1):45-54. doi: 10.1177/1129729819852203. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
10
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in the ICU: A Retrospective Study of Adult Medical Patients in 52 Hospitals.重症监护病房中外周置入的中心导管:52 家医院成年内科患者的回顾性研究。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):e1136-e1144. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003423.