School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 May 6;19(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02751-6.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrapleural perfusion with hyperthermic chemotherapy (IPHC) in treating malignant pleural effusion (MPE).
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full-text Database (VP-CSJFD), and Wanfang database were searched by computer from database establishment to January 17, 2024. Relevant randomized controlled articles with IPHC as the observational group and intrapleural perfusion chemotherapy (IPC) as the control group for MPE were included. Then, the methodological quality of the included articles was evaluated and statistically analyzed using Stata 16.0.
Sixteen trials with 647 patients receiving IPHC and 661 patients receiving IPC were included. The meta-analysis found that MPE patients in the IPHC group had a more significant objective response rate [RR = 1.31, 95%CI (1.23, 1.38), P < 0.05] and life quality improvement rate [RR = 2.88, 95%CI (1.95, 4.24), P < 0.05] than those in the IPC group. IPHC and IPC for MPE patients had similar incidence rates of asthenia, thrombocytopenia, hepatic impairment, and leukopenia.
Compared with IPC, IPHC has a higher objective response rate without significantly increasing adverse reactions. Therefore, IPHC is effective and safe. However, this study is limited by the quality of the literature. Therefore, more high-quality, multi-center, large-sample, rigorously designed randomized controlled clinical studies are still needed for verification and evaluation.
评估胸腔内高温化疗灌注(IPHC)治疗恶性胸腔积液(MPE)的疗效和安全性。
计算机检索建库至 2024 年 1 月 17 日PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国知网(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、维普中文科技期刊全文数据库(VP-CSJFD)和万方数据库,纳入以 IPHC 为观察组、胸腔内灌注化疗(IPC)为对照组治疗 MPE 的随机对照研究,评价纳入研究的方法学质量后,采用 Stata 16.0 软件进行统计学分析。
共纳入 16 项研究,包括 647 例 IPHC 组患者和 661 例 IPC 组患者。Meta 分析结果显示,IPHC 组患者的客观缓解率[RR=1.31,95%CI(1.23,1.38),P<0.05]和生活质量改善率[RR=2.88,95%CI(1.95,4.24),P<0.05]均高于 IPC 组;两组患者乏力、血小板减少、肝功能损害、白细胞减少发生率差异均无统计学意义。
与 IPC 相比,IPHC 提高了客观缓解率且不增加不良反应,疗效确切且安全,但受纳入研究质量的限制,仍需要更多高质量、多中心、大样本、设计严谨的随机对照临床研究进一步验证和评价。