Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Laboratory of Brain Disorders, Ministry of Science and Technology, Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Disorders, Capital Medical University, No. 10, Xitoutiao, You'an Men Wai, Fengtai District, Beijing 100069, China.
Chinese Institute for Brain Research, No. 26, Kexueyuan Road, Changping District, Beijing 102206, China.
Brief Bioinform. 2024 Mar 27;25(3). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae140.
Common genetic variants and susceptibility loci associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been discovered through large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS), GWAS by proxy (GWAX) and meta-analysis of GWAS and GWAX (GWAS+GWAX). However, due to the very low repeatability of AD susceptibility loci and the low heritability of AD, these AD genetic findings have been questioned. We summarize AD genetic findings from the past 10 years and provide a new interpretation of these findings in the context of statistical heterogeneity. We discovered that only 17% of AD risk loci demonstrated reproducibility with a genome-wide significance of P < 5.00E-08 across all AD GWAS and GWAS+GWAX datasets. We highlighted that the AD GWAS+GWAX with the largest sample size failed to identify the most significant signals, the maximum number of genome-wide significant genetic variants or maximum heritability. Additionally, we identified widespread statistical heterogeneity in AD GWAS+GWAX datasets, but not in AD GWAS datasets. We consider that statistical heterogeneity may have attenuated the statistical power in AD GWAS+GWAX and may contribute to explaining the low repeatability (17%) of genome-wide significant AD susceptibility loci and the decreased AD heritability (40-2%) as the sample size increased. Importantly, evidence supports the idea that a decrease in statistical heterogeneity facilitates the identification of genome-wide significant genetic loci and contributes to an increase in AD heritability. Collectively, current AD GWAX and GWAS+GWAX findings should be meticulously assessed and warrant additional investigation, and AD GWAS+GWAX should employ multiple meta-analysis methods, such as random-effects inverse variance-weighted meta-analysis, which is designed specifically for statistical heterogeneity.
通过大规模全基因组关联研究(GWAS)、代理 GWAS(GWAX)和 GWAS 与 GWAX 的荟萃分析(GWAS+GWAX),已经发现了与阿尔茨海默病(AD)相关的常见遗传变异和易感基因座。然而,由于 AD 易感性基因座的可重复性非常低,以及 AD 的遗传率低,这些 AD 遗传发现受到了质疑。我们总结了过去 10 年 AD 遗传研究的发现,并在统计异质性的背景下对这些发现进行了新的解释。我们发现,只有 17%的 AD 风险基因座在所有 AD GWAS 和 GWAS+GWAX 数据集的全基因组显著水平 P<5.00E-08 下具有可重复性。我们强调,样本量最大的 AD GWAS+GWAX 未能确定最显著的信号、最多的全基因组显著遗传变异或最大的遗传率。此外,我们发现 AD GWAS+GWAX 数据集中存在广泛的统计异质性,但在 AD GWAS 数据集中不存在。我们认为,统计异质性可能削弱了 AD GWAS+GWAX 的统计效力,并可能有助于解释全基因组显著的 AD 易感性基因座的可重复性低(17%)和 AD 遗传率(40-2%)随样本量增加而降低。重要的是,有证据支持这样一种观点,即统计异质性的降低有助于确定全基因组显著的遗传基因座,并有助于增加 AD 的遗传率。总的来说,目前的 AD GWAX 和 GWAS+GWAX 研究结果应该进行仔细评估,并需要进一步研究,AD GWAS+GWAX 应该采用多种荟萃分析方法,如随机效应逆方差加权荟萃分析,这是专门为统计异质性设计的。