• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种经皮肾镜取石术治疗小儿肾结石的比较:微经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术。

Comparison of two percutaneous nephrolithotomy methods for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones: mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

机构信息

Health Sciences University, Adana City Training and Research Hospital Urology Clinic, Adana.

Bas¸kent University, Alanya Application and Research Center, Alanya.

出版信息

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2024 May 6;96(2):12369. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2024.12369.

DOI:10.4081/aiua.2024.12369
PMID:38713072
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the aim was to compare the results of mini and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data for 128 patients < 18 years of age who underwent mini and standard PCNL due to pediatric kidney stones were retrospectively examined. Patients were divided into two groups: mini-PCNL (16-20 Fr) and standard PCNL (26 Fr). Surgery time, number of punctures to the pelvicalyceal system, hospital stay, postoperative hemoglobin drop, complications and stone-free status (SFR) were compared between the groups. Additional surgical intervention (double-J stent, ureterorenoscopy, secondary PCNL) performed after the surgery was recorded. The absence of residual stones or < 3 mm residual stones on kidney, ureter and bladder radiography (KUB) and ultrasonography (USG) performed in the third postoperative month were accepted as success criteria.

RESULTS

There were 32 (43.8%) patients in the mini-PCNL group and 41 (56.2%) patients in the standard PCNL group. The mean age was 9.3 ± 4.1 years in the mini-PCNL group and 10.1 ± 5.4 years in the standard PCNL group. Mean stone size in the mini-PCNL group was 2.1 ± 1.2; while for standard PCNL it was 2.3 ± 1.4. The mean surgery time was statistically significantly higher in the mini-PCNL group (p = 0.005). There was no difference between the groups in terms of intraoperative double J stent use, postoperative complications and SFR. A double J stent was inserted in two patients in the mini-PCNL group and in one patient in the standard PCNL group due to urine leakage from the nephrostomy tract in the postoperative period. Although the postoperative hemoglobin drop was found to be significantly higher in standard PCNL (p = 0.001), hematuria and blood transfusion rates were low in both groups. Mean hospital stay was shorter in the mini-PCNL group compared to standard PCNL (3.6 ± 1.2 days vs. 2.5 ± 1.1; p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Although mini-PCNL has longer surgery time compared to standard PCNL, it should be preferred for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones due to advantages such as similar success and complication rates to standard PCNL, short hospital stay and less postoperative hemoglobin drop.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较微通道和标准经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)治疗小儿肾结石的效果。

材料与方法

回顾性分析了 128 例因小儿肾结石接受微通道和标准 PCNL 治疗的患者资料。患者被分为两组:微通道 PCNL(16-20Fr)和标准 PCNL(26Fr)。比较两组的手术时间、肾盂肾盏穿刺次数、住院时间、术后血红蛋白下降值、并发症和结石清除率(SFR)。记录术后额外的手术干预(双 J 支架、输尿管软镜、二期 PCNL)。术后第 3 个月行腹部平片(KUB)和超声(USG)检查,若未见残余结石或残余结石直径<3mm,则视为成功。

结果

微通道 PCNL 组 32 例(43.8%),标准 PCNL 组 41 例(56.2%)。微通道 PCNL 组的平均年龄为 9.3±4.1 岁,标准 PCNL 组为 10.1±5.4 岁。微通道 PCNL 组的结石平均大小为 2.1±1.2cm,标准 PCNL 组为 2.3±1.4cm。微通道 PCNL 组的手术时间明显长于标准 PCNL 组(p=0.005)。两组术中双 J 支架使用、术后并发症及 SFR 无差异。微通道 PCNL 组有 2 例和标准 PCNL 组有 1 例因术后经皮肾造瘘管漏尿而留置双 J 支架。标准 PCNL 组术后血红蛋白下降值明显高于微通道 PCNL 组(p=0.001),但两组的血尿和输血发生率均较低。微通道 PCNL 组的平均住院时间短于标准 PCNL 组(3.6±1.2d 比 2.5±1.1d;p=0.018)。

结论

虽然微通道 PCNL 的手术时间比标准 PCNL 长,但因其与标准 PCNL 具有相似的成功率和并发症发生率、较短的住院时间和较少的术后血红蛋白下降值,因此对于小儿肾结石的治疗,应优先考虑微通道 PCNL。

相似文献

1
Comparison of two percutaneous nephrolithotomy methods for the treatment of pediatric kidney stones: mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy.两种经皮肾镜取石术治疗小儿肾结石的比较:微经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2024 May 6;96(2):12369. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2024.12369.
2
Comparison of two methods for treatment of 1-2 cm kidney stones in pediatric patients: mini PCNL and RIRS.两种方法治疗小儿 1-2cm 肾结石的比较:微通道经皮肾镜取石术和输尿管软镜碎石术。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jul 8;409(1):207. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03402-z.
3
Mini- versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of pediatric renal stones: is smaller enough?微通道与标准经皮肾镜碎石术治疗小儿肾结石:更小就是更好吗?
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Dec;15(6):664.e1-664.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
4
Comparison of postoperative outcomes of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis.微创经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术术后疗效比较的Meta 分析。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Oct;50(5):523-533. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01349-8. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
5
Mini-versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric population: A randomized controlled trial.微创经皮肾镜碎石术与标准经皮肾镜碎石术治疗小儿肾结石:一项随机对照试验。
J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Dec;19(6):688-695. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.08.013. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
6
Comparison of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Pelvic Stones of 2-3 cm.2-3cm 肾盂结石的微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行性肾内手术比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Jun;31(6):605-609. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0860. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
7
Use of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) compared with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in pediatric kidney stones.经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)与逆行输尿管软镜碎石术(RIRS)治疗儿童肾结石的比较。
World J Urol. 2022 Dec;40(12):3083-3089. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04186-x. Epub 2022 Oct 16.
8
Comparison between standard, mini and ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for single renal stones: a prospective study.标准、迷你和超迷你经皮肾镜取石术治疗单个肾结石的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2543-2548. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04107-y. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
9
Is percutaneous nephrolithotomy effective and safe for children with solitary kidney?经皮肾镜取石术治疗孤立肾儿童的有效性和安全性如何?
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Aug;38(8):1171-1175. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05147-6. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
10
Mini vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a comparative study.微通道与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石:一项对照研究。
Urolithiasis. 2019 Apr;47(2):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s00240-018-1055-9. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive value of scoring systems for stone free status and complications before percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children.儿童经皮肾镜取石术前结石清除状态及并发症评分系统的预测价值
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 10;15(1):8292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91760-z.