Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Box 117, Lund, 22100, Sweden.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 7;24(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05477-0.
Scientific evidence is important to evidence-based practice. Hence, the application of evidence-based practice requires relevant skills and an understanding of science, which therefore need to be learned and trained during the undergraduate program in physiotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate attitudes, perceived competence, and conditions for a scientific approach among physiotherapy students in Sweden, and to compare attitudes and perceived competence between students in different program years.
Physiotherapy students from six universities (n = 1499) were invited to respond to a digital survey. The survey contained questions regarding attitudes toward science, perceived competence in research interpretations and open comments regarding requirements for a strengthened scientific approach during education. Comparisons between education years were performed with ANOVA/Kruskal‒Wallis test (scale outcomes) and logistic regression (binary outcomes).
A total of 466 students responded to the survey. In total, 57% (n = 266) of the students had a high interest in science. No significant difference in interest in science was found between students in the three program years, but 75% (n = 347) reported increased interest during the program. A perceived high ability to understand the structure and performance of scientific studies was reported by 31% (n = 144), to evaluate the methodology by 16% (n = 72) and to interpret statistical results from scientific studies by 12% (n = 55). The lowest perceived competence was reported among students in their second year (p < 0.05). A majority of the students (88%; n = 410) reported a perceived personal need for strengthened conditions for a scientific approach, with suggested prerequisites during education via increased theoretical and applied understanding of the research.
Even though this study does not fully cover physiotherapy students at all undergraduate programmes in Sweden, the results support that a scientific approach and training should be strengthened during education to enable physiotherapists to understand and interpret science and to fully apply an evidence-based approach in upcoming clinical practice. Both theoretical and applied knowledge and understanding are needed.
科学证据对循证实践很重要。因此,循证实践的应用需要相关技能和对科学的理解,这需要在物理治疗本科课程中学习和培训。本研究旨在调查瑞典物理治疗专业学生的态度、感知能力和对科学方法的条件,并比较不同年级学生的态度和感知能力。
六所大学的物理治疗专业学生(n=1499)被邀请回答数字调查。调查包含了关于对科学的态度、对研究解释的感知能力以及对教育中加强科学方法的要求的开放性意见的问题。通过 ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis 检验(量表结果)和逻辑回归(二项结果)比较教育年限。
共有 466 名学生对调查做出了回应。总的来说,57%(n=266)的学生对科学很感兴趣。在三个年级的学生中,对科学的兴趣没有显著差异,但 75%(n=347)报告在课程中兴趣增加。31%(n=144)报告具有较高的理解科学研究结构和性能的能力,16%(n=72)能够评估方法学,12%(n=55)能够解释科学研究的统计结果。感知能力最低的是第二年的学生(p<0.05)。大多数学生(88%;n=410)认为需要加强科学方法的条件,建议在教育中增加对研究的理论和应用理解,作为先决条件。
尽管本研究不完全涵盖瑞典所有本科物理治疗课程的学生,但结果支持在教育中加强科学方法和培训,以使物理治疗师能够理解和解释科学,并在未来的临床实践中充分应用循证方法。需要理论和应用知识和理解。