Department of Vascular Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Nov;54(5):654-658. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
Despite the variety of assessment tools available, multiple choice questions (MCQs) still play an integral part in examinations at both a national and speciality board level. MCQs have a number of methodological advantages yet their strength is related to the quality of the question posed. Specifically, there has been a move towards the MCQ testing a taxonomically higher order concept of integration-interpretation and problem solving. This paper focuses on question development and the potential pitfalls to avoid.
尽管有各种各样的评估工具可用，多项选择题 (MCQs) 仍然在国家和专业委员会层面的考试中发挥着重要作用。MCQs 具有许多方法学上的优势，但它们的优势与提出问题的质量有关。具体来说，已经朝着 MCQ 测试更高级别的分类概念——综合、解释和解决问题的方向发展。本文重点介绍问题的开发和需要避免的潜在陷阱。
