• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项前瞻性队列研究,评估TRISS和TRISS-SpO评分系统在评估印度创伤研究参与者死亡风险中的应用。

A prospective cohort study evaluating the TRISS and TRISS-SpO scoring systems for assessing mortality risk in trauma study participants in India.

作者信息

Vetri Rishwanth, Piramanayagam Dhanabalan, Ravi Preethy

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Department of General Surgery, Government Thoothukudi Medical College and Hospital, Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2024 Jan-Mar;14(1):21-25. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_38_23. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

DOI:10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_38_23
PMID:38715754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11073638/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Globally, trauma cases have significant morbidity and mortality. Hence, various scoring systems have been designed to improve the prognosis in trauma cases. Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) is one of the widely used models to predict mortality; however, it has certain limitation. We have aimed to evaluate the survival prediction of new model TRISS-oxygen saturation (SpO) and to compare with original TRISS score in trauma study participants.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study conducted on 380 trauma study participants admitted to the surgery department from January 20, 2021, to November 28, 2021. The proposed model includes TRISS-SpO which replaces pulse SpO instead of revised trauma score in the original TRISS score. Probability of survival (Ps) was calculated for both models using coefficients derived from Walker-Duncan regression analysis analyzed from the Major Trauma Outcome Study. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to predict model performance and the accuracy was calculated.

RESULTS

The mortality rate in the present study was 30 (7.9%). The predictive accuracy of original TRISS score which calculated Ps based on respiratory rate was 97.11%, and for the proposed model of TRISS score which calculated Ps based on SpO was found 97.11%, and thus there is no significant difference in the performance.

CONCLUSIONS

The new proposed model TRISS-SpO showed a good accuracy which is similar to original TRISS score. However, the new tool TRISS-SpO might be easier to use for robust performance in the clinical setting.

摘要

背景

在全球范围内,创伤病例具有较高的发病率和死亡率。因此,人们设计了各种评分系统来改善创伤病例的预后。创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)是广泛用于预测死亡率的模型之一;然而,它有一定的局限性。我们旨在评估新模型TRISS-血氧饱和度(SpO)的生存预测能力,并在创伤研究参与者中与原始TRISS评分进行比较。

方法

这是一项前瞻性队列研究,对2021年1月20日至2021年11月28日入住外科的380名创伤研究参与者进行。所提出的模型包括TRISS-SpO,它在原始TRISS评分中取代了脉搏SpO而不是修正创伤评分。使用从重大创伤结局研究分析得出的Walker-Duncan回归分析系数,为两个模型计算生存概率(Ps)。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析来预测模型性能并计算准确性。

结果

本研究中的死亡率为30例(7.9%)。基于呼吸频率计算Ps的原始TRISS评分的预测准确率为97.11%,基于SpO计算Ps的TRISS评分所提出模型的预测准确率为97.11%,因此性能上没有显著差异。

结论

新提出的模型TRISS-SpO显示出与原始TRISS评分相似的良好准确性。然而,新工具TRISS-SpO在临床环境中可能更易于使用以实现强大的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/11073638/2550f1af2361/IJCIIS-14-21-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/11073638/ed1410693346/IJCIIS-14-21-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/11073638/2550f1af2361/IJCIIS-14-21-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/11073638/ed1410693346/IJCIIS-14-21-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/751d/11073638/2550f1af2361/IJCIIS-14-21-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A prospective cohort study evaluating the TRISS and TRISS-SpO scoring systems for assessing mortality risk in trauma study participants in India.一项前瞻性队列研究,评估TRISS和TRISS-SpO评分系统在评估印度创伤研究参与者死亡风险中的应用。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2024 Jan-Mar;14(1):21-25. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_38_23. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
2
New Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) adjustments for survival prediction.新创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)调整以进行生存预测。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Mar 6;13:12. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0171-8. eCollection 2018.
3
Trauma survival prediction in Asian population: a modification of TRISS to improve accuracy.亚洲人群创伤生存预测:TRISS 修正以提高准确性。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Feb;31(2):126-33. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201831. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
4
Validation of age-specific survival prediction in pediatric patients with blunt trauma using trauma and injury severity score methodology: a ten-year Nationwide observational study.使用创伤和损伤严重程度评分方法对钝性创伤儿科患者进行年龄特异性生存预测的验证:一项为期十年的全国性观察性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Nov 18;20(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00385-0.
5
Spectral analysis of heart rate variability for trauma outcome prediction: an analysis of 210 ICU multiple trauma patients.心率变异性的频谱分析用于创伤预后预测:对 210 例 ICU 多发创伤患者的分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb;47(1):153-160. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01175-5. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
6
A comparison of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score and the Trauma-Injury Severity Score (TRISS) for outcome assessment in intensive care unit trauma patients.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分与创伤严重程度评分(TRISS)在重症监护病房创伤患者预后评估中的比较。
Crit Care Med. 1996 Oct;24(10):1642-8. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199610000-00007.
7
Comparison of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator, Trauma and Injury Severity Score, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status to predict operative trauma mortality in elderly patients.比较国家手术质量改进计划手术风险计算器、创伤和损伤严重程度评分以及美国麻醉师协会身体状况评分,以预测老年患者手术创伤死亡率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Mar 1;92(3):481-488. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003481.
8
Validation of trauma and injury severity score in blunt trauma patients by using a Canadian trauma registry.通过加拿大创伤登记处对钝性创伤患者的创伤和损伤严重程度评分进行验证。
J Trauma. 1996 May;40(5):733-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199605000-00008.
9
Validation of international trauma scoring systems in urban trauma centres in India.国际创伤评分系统在印度城市创伤中心的验证
Injury. 2016 Nov;47(11):2459-2464. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
10
Comparison of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scoring system, and Trauma and Injury Severity Score method for predicting the outcomes of intensive care unit trauma patients.比较序贯器官衰竭评估、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统 II 和创伤和损伤严重程度评分方法在预测 ICU 创伤患者结局中的应用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jun;30(5):749-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.05.022. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness of trauma care systems at different stages of development in reducing mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.创伤护理系统在不同发展阶段降低死亡率的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Jul 13;16(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00381-0.
2
The impact of trauma systems on patient outcomes.创伤系统对患者预后的影响。
Curr Probl Surg. 2021 Jan;58(1):100849. doi: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2020.100849. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
3
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.
204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 369 种疾病和伤害导致的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
4
External validation of a modified trauma and injury severity score model in major trauma injury.改良创伤和损伤严重度评分模型在严重创伤损伤中的外部验证。
Injury. 2019 May;50(5):1118-1124. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.12.031. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
5
Validation of trauma scales: ISS, NISS, RTS and TRISS for predicting mortality in a Colombian population.创伤评分的验证:用于预测哥伦比亚人群死亡率的损伤严重度评分(ISS)、新损伤严重度评分(NISS)、创伤评分(RTS)和创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Feb;27(2):213-220. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1892-6. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
6
Performance of Trauma and Injury Severity Score(TRISS) adjustments: an integrative review.创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)调整的性能:一项综合综述。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015 Feb;49 Spec No:138-46. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420150000700020.
7
The development of simple survival prediction models for blunt trauma victims treated at Asian emergency centers.亚洲急救中心救治的钝器创伤患者简单生存预测模型的开发。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Feb 2;20:9. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-9.
8
The role of the New Trauma and Injury Severity Score (NTRISS) for survival prediction.新创伤和损伤严重程度评分(NTRISS)在生存预测中的作用。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2011 Dec;45(6):1353-8. doi: 10.1590/s0080-62342011000600011.
9
The Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) revised.创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)修订版。
Injury. 2011 Jan;42(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.040.
10
Should the New Injury Severity Score replace the Injury Severity Score in the Trauma and Injury Severity Score?在创伤和损伤严重程度评分中,新损伤严重程度评分是否应取代损伤严重程度评分?
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2008 Oct;14(4):308-12.