• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚洲急救中心救治的钝器创伤患者简单生存预测模型的开发。

The development of simple survival prediction models for blunt trauma victims treated at Asian emergency centers.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine & Critical Care, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Hospital, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Feb 2;20:9. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-9.

DOI:10.1186/1757-7241-20-9
PMID:22296837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3471327/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For real-time assessment of the probability of survival (Ps) of blunt trauma victims at emergency centers, this study aimed to establish regression models for estimating Ps using simplified coefficients.

METHODS

The data of 10,210 blunt trauma patients not missing both the binary outcome data about survival and the data necessary for Ps calculation by The Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) method were extracted from the Japan Trauma Data Bank (2004-2007) and analyzed. Half (5,113) of the data was allocated to a derivation data set, with the other half (5,097) allocated to a validation data set. The data of 6,407 blunt trauma victims from the trauma registry of Khon Kaen Regional Hospital in Thailand were analyzed for validation. The logistic regression models included age, the Injury Severity Score (ISS), the Glasgow Coma Scale score (GCS), systolic blood pressure (SBP), respiratory rate (RR), and their coded values (cAGE, 0-1; cISS, 0-4; cSBP, 0-4; cGCS, 0-4; cRR, 0-4) as predictor variables. The coefficients were simplified by rounding off after the decimal point or choosing 0.5 if the coefficients varied across 0.5. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROCC) was calculated for each model to measure discriminant ability.

RESULTS

A group of formulas (log (Ps/1-Ps) = logit (Ps) = -9 + cISS - cAGE + cSBP + cGCS + cRR/2, where -9 becomes -7 if the predictor variable of cRR or cISS is missing) was developed. Using these formulas, the AUROCCs were between 0.950 and 0.964. When these models were applied to the Khon Kean data, their AUROCCs were greater than 0.91.

CONCLUSION

These equations allow physicians to perform real-time assessments of survival by easy mental calculations at Asian emergency centers, which are overcrowded with blunt injury victims of traffic accidents.

摘要

背景

为了在急救中心实时评估钝器创伤患者的生存率(Ps),本研究旨在建立使用简化系数估算 Ps 的回归模型。

方法

从日本创伤数据库(2004-2007 年)中提取了 10210 例钝器创伤患者的资料,这些患者的二项生存结局数据和使用创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)方法计算 Ps 所需的数据均无缺失。将数据的一半(5113 例)分配给推导数据集,另一半(5097 例)分配给验证数据集。还分析了来自泰国孔敬地区医院创伤登记处的 6407 例钝器创伤患者的数据以进行验证。逻辑回归模型纳入了年龄、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、收缩压(SBP)、呼吸频率(RR)及其编码值(cAGE,0-1;cISS,0-4;cSBP,0-4;cGCS,0-4;cRR,0-4)作为预测变量。通过四舍五入或选择 0.5 将系数简化到小数点后一位,或者如果系数在 0.5 之间变化。计算每个模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROCC)以衡量判别能力。

结果

得出了一组公式(log(Ps/1-Ps)=logit(Ps)=-9+cISS-cAGE+cSBP+cGCS+cRR/2,其中如果预测变量 cRR 或 cISS 缺失,则-9 变为-7)。使用这些公式,AUROCC 介于 0.950 和 0.964 之间。当将这些模型应用于孔敬数据时,其 AUROCC 大于 0.91。

结论

这些方程允许医生在亚洲急救中心通过简单的心理计算实时评估患者的生存情况,这些中心挤满了因交通事故而遭受钝器伤的患者。

相似文献

1
The development of simple survival prediction models for blunt trauma victims treated at Asian emergency centers.亚洲急救中心救治的钝器创伤患者简单生存预测模型的开发。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012 Feb 2;20:9. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-20-9.
2
Modification of the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) method provides better survival prediction in Asian blunt trauma victims.改良创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)方法能更好地预测亚洲钝器创伤患者的生存情况。
World J Surg. 2012 Apr;36(4):813-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1498-z.
3
Trauma survival prediction in Asian population: a modification of TRISS to improve accuracy.亚洲人群创伤生存预测:TRISS 修正以提高准确性。
Emerg Med J. 2014 Feb;31(2):126-33. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201831. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
4
Validation of age-specific survival prediction in pediatric patients with blunt trauma using trauma and injury severity score methodology: a ten-year Nationwide observational study.使用创伤和损伤严重程度评分方法对钝性创伤儿科患者进行年龄特异性生存预测的验证:一项为期十年的全国性观察性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Nov 18;20(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00385-0.
5
Novel Trauma Composite Score is a more reliable predictor of mortality than Injury Severity Score in pediatric trauma.新型创伤综合评分比损伤严重程度评分更能可靠地预测儿科创伤患者的死亡率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Oct 1;91(4):599-604. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003235.
6
Impact of initial coagulation and fibrinolytic markers on mortality in patients with severe blunt trauma: a multicentre retrospective observational study.初始凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物对严重钝性创伤患者死亡率的影响:一项多中心回顾性观察研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Feb 28;27(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0606-6.
7
New Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) adjustments for survival prediction.新创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)调整以进行生存预测。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Mar 6;13:12. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0171-8. eCollection 2018.
8
Novel Trauma Composite Score is superior to Injury Severity Score in predicting mortality across all ages.新型创伤综合评分优于损伤严重度评分,可预测各年龄段死亡率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Oct 1;91(4):621-626. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003340.
9
New Injury Severity Score is a better predictor of mortality for blunt trauma patients than the Injury Severity Score.对于钝性创伤患者,新损伤严重程度评分比损伤严重程度评分能更好地预测死亡率。
World J Surg. 2015 Jan;39(1):165-71. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2745-2.
10
The Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) revised.创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)修订版。
Injury. 2011 Jan;42(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.040.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Glasgow coma scale, motor component, eye component, and simplified motor scale for predicting trauma outcomes: a 13-year multicenter retrospective cohort study.格拉斯哥昏迷量表、运动部分、眼部部分及简化运动量表对创伤预后预测的比较:一项为期13年的多中心回顾性队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 May 30;25(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01246-4.
2
rSIG combined with NLR in the prognostic assessment of patients with multiple injuries.红细胞分布宽度标准差(rSIG)联合中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)在多发伤患者预后评估中的应用
Open Med (Wars). 2025 Apr 8;20(1):20251161. doi: 10.1515/med-2025-1161. eCollection 2025.
3
Combination of reverse shock index and simplified motor score as a strong discriminator of trauma outcomes.反向休克指数与简化运动评分相结合作为创伤结局的有力判别指标。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2458205. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2458205. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
4
A prospective cohort study evaluating the TRISS and TRISS-SpO scoring systems for assessing mortality risk in trauma study participants in India.一项前瞻性队列研究,评估TRISS和TRISS-SpO评分系统在评估印度创伤研究参与者死亡风险中的应用。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2024 Jan-Mar;14(1):21-25. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_38_23. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
5
Reverse shock index multiplied by simplified motor score as a predictor of clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19.反向休克指数乘以简化运动评分,可预测 COVID-19 患者的临床结局。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00948-5.
6
Development of a modified trauma and injury severity score to predict disability in acute trauma patients.一种改良创伤和损伤严重程度评分的开发,用于预测急性创伤患者的残疾情况。
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;7(4):281-289. doi: 10.15441/ceem.19.097. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
7
International technical transfer of training systems and skills in emergency medicine and trauma management: experiences of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Japan.急诊医学与创伤管理培训系统及技能的国际技术转让:日本国立全球健康与医学中心的经验
Glob Health Med. 2020 Feb 29;2(1):24-28. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2019.01016.
8
The ratio of shock index to pulse oxygen saturation predicting mortality of emergency trauma patients.休克指数与脉搏血氧饱和度比值预测急诊创伤患者死亡率。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 23;15(7):e0236094. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236094. eCollection 2020.
9
Reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale score (rSIG) is a simple measure with high discriminant ability for mortality risk in trauma patients: an analysis of the Japan Trauma Data Bank.反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷评分(rSIG)是一种简单的方法,具有较高的鉴别能力,可用于预测创伤患者的死亡风险:日本创伤数据库分析。
Crit Care. 2018 Apr 11;22(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2014-0.
10
New Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) adjustments for survival prediction.新创伤和损伤严重度评分(TRISS)调整以进行生存预测。
World J Emerg Surg. 2018 Mar 6;13:12. doi: 10.1186/s13017-018-0171-8. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Simplified alternative to the TRISS method for resource-constrained settings.资源有限情况下的 TRISS 方法简化替代方案。
World J Surg. 2011 Mar;35(3):512-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0865-x.
2
Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) coefficients 2009 revision.创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)系数2009年修订版。
J Trauma. 2010 Apr;68(4):761-70. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d3223b.
3
Injury severity scoring again.再次进行损伤严重程度评分。
J Trauma. 1995 Jan;38(1):94-5. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199501000-00024.
4
The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.损伤严重度评分:一种描述多发伤患者及评估急诊治疗的方法。
J Trauma. 1974 Mar;14(3):187-96.
5
The Injury Severity Score revisited.再谈损伤严重度评分
J Trauma. 1988 Jan;28(1):69-77. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198801000-00010.
6
Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score.评估创伤护理:TRISS 方法。创伤评分与损伤严重程度评分。
J Trauma. 1987 Apr;27(4):370-8.
7
A revision of the Trauma Score.创伤评分的修订。
J Trauma. 1989 May;29(5):623-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198905000-00017.