Department of Head and Neck, Esophageal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Cancer Med. 2024 May;13(9):e7235. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7235.
First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab both demonstrated significant overall survival (OS) benefit versus chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the CheckMate 648 trial, leading to approvals of both nivolumab-containing regimens in many countries. We report longer-term follow-up data.
This open-label, phase III trial (NCT03143153) enrolled adults with previously untreated, unresectable, advanced, recurrent, or metastatic ESCC. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to nivolumab plus chemotherapy, nivolumab plus ipilimumab, or chemotherapy. Primary endpoints were OS and progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review. Hierarchical testing was performed first in patients with tumor cell programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of ≥1% and then in the overall population.
A total of 970 patients were randomly assigned. After 29 months of minimum follow-up, nivolumab plus chemotherapy continued to demonstrate improvement in OS versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.59 [95% CI: 0.46-0.76]) in patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of ≥1% and in the overall population (HR = 0.78 [95% CI: 0.65-0.93]) and with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy (HR = 0.62 [95% CI: 0.48-0.80]) in patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of ≥1% and in the overall population (HR = 0.77 [95% CI: 0.65-0.92]). In patients with tumor cell PD-L1 expression of ≥1%, nivolumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated PFS benefit versus chemotherapy (HR = 0.67 [95% CI: 0.51-0.89]); PFS benefit was not observed with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy (HR = 1.04 [95% CI: 0.79-1.36]). Among all treated patients (n = 936), Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 151 (49%, nivolumab plus chemotherapy), 105 (32%, nivolumab plus ipilimumab), and 110 (36%, chemotherapy) patients.
Nivolumab plus chemotherapy and nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful OS benefit versus chemotherapy with no new safety signals identified with longer follow-up, further supporting use as first-line standard treatment options for patients with advanced ESCC.
在未经治疗的晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者中,纳武利尤单抗联合化疗和纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗与化疗相比均显著提高了总生存期(OS),这导致了这两种含纳武利尤单抗的方案在许多国家获得批准。我们报告了更长时间的随访数据。
这是一项开放性、III 期临床试验(NCT03143153),纳入了未经治疗、不可切除、晚期、复发性或转移性 ESCC 的成年患者。患者按 1:1:1 的比例随机分配至纳武利尤单抗联合化疗、纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗或化疗组。主要终点为盲法独立中心评估的 OS 和无进展生存期(PFS)。分层检验首先在肿瘤细胞程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)表达≥1%的患者中进行,然后在总体人群中进行。
共纳入 970 例患者。在最小随访 29 个月后,在肿瘤细胞 PD-L1 表达≥1%的患者和总体人群中,纳武利尤单抗联合化疗继续显示出与化疗相比 OS 改善(风险比[HR]分别为 0.59[95%CI:0.46-0.76]和 0.78[95%CI:0.65-0.93]),在肿瘤细胞 PD-L1 表达≥1%的患者和总体人群中,纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗与化疗相比 OS 改善(HR 分别为 0.62[95%CI:0.48-0.80]和 0.77[95%CI:0.65-0.92])。在肿瘤细胞 PD-L1 表达≥1%的患者中,纳武利尤单抗联合化疗与化疗相比,PFS 获益(HR 为 0.67[95%CI:0.51-0.89]);与化疗相比,纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗未观察到 PFS 获益(HR 为 1.04[95%CI:0.79-1.36])。在所有接受治疗的患者(n=936)中,151 例(49%,纳武利尤单抗联合化疗)、105 例(32%,纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗)和 110 例(36%,化疗)患者报告了 3 级或 4 级治疗相关不良事件。
纳武利尤单抗联合化疗和纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗与化疗相比继续显示出具有临床意义的 OS 获益,且在更长时间的随访中未发现新的安全性信号,这进一步支持将其作为晚期 ESCC 患者的一线标准治疗选择。