Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories (CORELAB), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Sep;171(3):777-784. doi: 10.1002/ohn.796. Epub 2024 May 8.
To assess perioperative and readmission outcomes of patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNCA) surgery at safety-net hospitals (SNHs) in a modern cohort.
Retrospective cohort study.
Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), 2010 to 2019.
All elective adult (≥18 years) admissions involving HNCA resection were identified from the NRD. To calculate safety-net burden, the proportion of Medicaid or uninsured patients admitted to each hospital for any indication was tabulated annually, with centers in the highest quartile defined as SNHs. To perform risk adjustment in assessing perioperative and readmission outcomes, multivariable regression models were developed.
Of an estimated 133,018 head and neck surgical patients, 26.5% (n = 35,268) received treatment at a SNH. Utilization of SNHs increased over the decade-long study period, with 29.8% of individuals treated at these sites in 2019. After multivariable adjustment, several patient factors were noted to be associated with SNHs, including younger age, lower comorbidity burden, and income within the lowest quartile. Although incidence of adverse events decreased at both SNHs and non-SNHs during the study period, treatment at SNHs remained associated with these events after risk adjustment (adjusted odds ratio: 1.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-1.28, P < .001).
SNHs continue to provide valuable specialty care to underserved populations, often with limited financial resources. Despite promising results from prior decades demonstrating comparable perioperative outcomes, the present study noted increased adverse events following HNCA surgery at these sites. Such findings underscore the need for continued advocacy to secure necessary funding for these centers.
在现代队列中评估在安全网医院(SNH)接受头颈部癌症(HNCA)手术的患者的围手术期和再入院结果。
回顾性队列研究。
全国再入院数据库(NRD),2010 年至 2019 年。
从 NRD 中确定所有涉及 HNCA 切除术的成年(≥18 岁)选择性住院患者。为了计算安全网负担,每年列出每个医院因任何原因收治的 Medicaid 或无保险患者的比例,将中心分为最高四分位数的医院定义为 SNH。为了在评估围手术期和再入院结果时进行风险调整,开发了多变量回归模型。
在估计的 133018 例头颈部手术患者中,26.5%(n=35268)在 SNH 接受治疗。在长达十年的研究期间,SNH 的使用率有所增加,2019 年有 29.8%的患者在这些地点接受治疗。经过多变量调整后,有几个患者因素与 SNH 相关,包括年龄较小、合并症负担较低以及收入处于最低四分位数。尽管在研究期间,SNH 和非 SNH 的不良事件发生率均有所下降,但在风险调整后,SNH 的治疗仍与这些事件相关(调整后的优势比:1.17,95%置信区间:1.08-1.28,P<0.001)。
SNH 继续为服务不足的人群提供有价值的专业护理,这些人群通常资金有限。尽管前几十年的研究结果令人鼓舞,表明围手术期结果相当,但本研究指出,在这些地点进行 HNCA 手术后不良事件增加。这些发现强调需要继续倡导为这些中心提供必要的资金。