• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多维医疗保健系统信任量表(TIMHSS)的开发和验证。

Development and validation of the Trust in Multidimensional Healthcare Systems Scale (TIMHSS).

机构信息

School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

Department of Sociology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2024 May 8;23(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02162-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-024-02162-y
PMID:38720303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11078716/
Abstract

CONTEXT

The COVID-19 pandemic has reignited a commitment from the health policy and health services research communities to rebuilding trust in healthcare and created a renewed appetite for measures of trust for system monitoring and evaluation. The aim of the present paper was to develop a multidimensional measure of trust in healthcare that: (1) Is responsive to the conceptual and methodological limitations of existing measures; (2) Can be used to identify systemic explanations for lower levels of trust in equity-deserving populations; (3) Can be used to design and evaluate interventions aiming to (re)build trust.

METHODS

We conducted a 2021 review of existing measures of trust in healthcare, 72 qualitative interviews (Aug-Dec 2021; oversampling for equity-deserving populations), an expert review consensus process (Oct 2021), and factor analyses and validation testing based on two waves of survey data (Nov 2021, n = 694; Jan-Feb 2022, n = 740 respectively).

FINDINGS

We present the Trust in Multidimensional Healthcare Systems Scale (TIMHSS); a 38-item correlated three-factor measure of trust in doctors, policies, and the system. Measurement of invariance tests suggest that the TIMHSS can also be reliably administered to diverse populations.

CONCLUSIONS

This global measure of trust in healthcare can be used to measure trust over time at a population level, or used within specific subpopulations, to inform interventions to (re)build trust. It can also be used within a clinical setting to provide a stronger evidence base for associations between trust and therapeutic outcomes.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行重新激发了卫生政策和卫生服务研究界对重建医疗保健信任的承诺,并为系统监测和评估的信任措施创造了新的需求。本文旨在开发一种多维医疗保健信任度衡量工具,其:(1) 针对现有衡量工具的概念和方法局限性做出回应;(2) 可用于识别导致公平权益人群信任度较低的系统解释;(3) 可用于设计和评估旨在(重新)建立信任的干预措施。

方法

我们对现有的医疗保健信任度衡量工具进行了 2021 年的回顾,进行了 72 次定性访谈(2021 年 8 月至 12 月;对公平权益人群进行了过度采样)、专家审查共识流程(2021 年 10 月)以及基于两轮调查数据的因子分析和验证测试(分别为 2021 年 11 月,n=694;2022 年 1 月至 2 月,n=740)。

发现

我们提出了多维医疗保健系统信任度衡量工具(TIMHSS);这是一种 38 项相关的三因素医生、政策和系统信任度衡量工具。不变性测试的测量结果表明,TIMHSS 也可以可靠地用于不同人群。

结论

这种全球医疗保健信任度衡量工具可用于在人群层面上衡量随时间推移的信任度,或在特定亚人群中使用,为(重新)建立信任的干预措施提供信息。它也可在临床环境中使用,为信任与治疗效果之间的关联提供更强的证据基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06d4/11080216/4627219adef2/12939_2024_2162_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06d4/11080216/4627219adef2/12939_2024_2162_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06d4/11080216/4627219adef2/12939_2024_2162_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the Trust in Multidimensional Healthcare Systems Scale (TIMHSS).多维医疗保健系统信任量表(TIMHSS)的开发和验证。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 May 8;23(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02162-y.
2
Development and validation of the Trust in Government measure (TGM).政府信任度量表(TGM)的开发与验证。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 17;23(1):2023. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16974-0.
3
Effects of the COVID-19 Emergency and National Lockdown on Italian Citizens' Economic Concerns, Government Trust, and Health Engagement: Evidence From a Two-Wave Panel Study.COVID-19 紧急状态和全国封锁对意大利公民经济担忧、政府信任和健康参与的影响:来自两轮面板研究的证据。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):369-392. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
4
Perceived stress, trust, safety and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection among patients discharged from hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic's first wave: a PREMs survey.COVID-19 大流行第一波期间出院患者的感知压力、信任、安全性和 SARS-CoV-2 感染严重程度:PREMs 调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 16;12(6):e060559. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060559.
5
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.学校为遏制新冠疫情而采取的措施:一项范围综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 17;12(12):CD013812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013812.
6
Will 'the feeling of abandonment' remain? Persisting impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on rheumatology patients and clinicians.“被抛弃感”会持续存在吗?COVID-19 大流行对风湿病患者和临床医生的持续影响。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Aug 30;61(9):3723-3736. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab937.
7
Placing Trust at the Heart of Health Policy and Systems.将信任置于卫生政策和体系的核心。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:8410. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8410. Epub 2024 May 7.
8
Development and testing of a scale to measure trust in the public healthcare system.一种用于衡量对公共医疗系统信任度的量表的开发与测试。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2015 Jul-Sep;12(3):149-57. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2015.044.
9
Protocol for a patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) survey of patients discharged during the COVID-19 pandemic and their family caregivers.COVID-19 大流行期间出院患者及其家属护理者患者报告体验测量(PREMs)调查方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 23;11(2):e047033. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047033.
10
Awareness, knowledge and trust in the Greek authorities towards COVID-19 pandemic: results from the Epirus Health Study cohort.希腊民众对 COVID-19 大流行的认知、知识和信任:来自埃皮鲁斯健康研究队列的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 12;21(1):1125. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11193-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived Health Misinformation on Social Media and Public Trust in Health Care.社交媒体上的健康错误信息与公众对医疗保健的信任
Med Care. 2025 Sep 1;63(9):686-693. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002180. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
2
Trust under the microscope: psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Trust in Multidimensional Healthcare Systems Scale.显微镜下的信任:多维医疗保健系统信任量表波斯语版的心理测量评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jun 4;25(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12824-4.
3
Development and validation of the S-TIMHSS: a quality metric to inform and evaluate interventions to (re)build trust.

本文引用的文献

1
Informing efforts beyond tailored promotional campaigns by understanding contextual factors shaping vaccine hesitancy among equity-deserving populations in Canada: an exploratory qualitative study.在加拿大,通过了解影响公平受益人群疫苗犹豫的背景因素,开展超越定制宣传活动的信息传递工作:一项探索性定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Oct 7;22(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02025-y.
2
Examining factors impacting acceptance of COVID-19 countermeasures among structurally marginalised Canadians.考察结构性弱势群体对 COVID-19 防控措施接受度的影响因素。
Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan;18(1):2263525. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2023.2263525. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
3
S-TIMHSS的开发与验证:一种用于指导和评估(重新)建立信任干预措施的质量指标。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 30;13:1568836. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1568836. eCollection 2025.
4
Belief that Progress has Been Made in Curing Cancer Varies by Perception of Social Media Health Mis- and Disinformation, Education, Frequency of Social Media Use, and Healthcare System Trust: A Cross-Sectional Study.相信在治愈癌症方面已经取得进展的程度因对社交媒体健康错误和虚假信息的看法、教育程度、社交媒体使用频率以及对医疗保健系统的信任程度而异:一项横断面研究。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241289259. doi: 10.1177/10732748241289259.
Canadians' trust in government in a time of crisis: Does it matter?
加拿大在危机时期对政府的信任:这有关系吗?
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0290664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290664. eCollection 2023.
4
Newcomer perceptions of COVID-19 countermeasures in Canada.初到加拿大的人对新冠疫情防控措施的看法。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Jun 1;38(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daad051.
5
Fifty Years of Trust Research in Health Care: A Synthetic Review.五十年来医疗保健领域信任研究综述。
Milbank Q. 2023 Mar;101(1):126-178. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12598. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
6
Aunties, WhatsApp, and "haldi da doodh": South Asian communities' perspectives on improving COVID-19 public health communication in Ontario, Canada.阿姨们、WhatsApp 群组和“haldi da doodh”:加拿大安大略省南亚社区改善 COVID-19 公共卫生传播的观点。
Can J Public Health. 2022 Dec;113(Suppl 1):46-53. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00712-x. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
7
Examining social class as it relates to heuristics women use to determine the trustworthiness of information regarding the link between alcohol and breast cancer risk.探讨社会阶层与女性用于确定有关酒精与乳腺癌风险之间关联信息可信度的启发式方法之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 12;17(9):e0270936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270936. eCollection 2022.
8
Development and Validation of the Trust in My Doctor, Trust in Doctors in General, and Trust in the Health Care Team Scales.信任我的医生、信任一般医生和信任医疗团队量表的编制与验证。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114827. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114827. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
9
The dangers of blind trust: Examining the interplay among social media news use, misinformation identification, and news trust on conspiracy beliefs.盲目信任的危险:审视社交媒体新闻使用、错误信息识别以及新闻信任对阴谋论信仰的相互作用。
Public Underst Sci. 2021 Nov;30(8):977-992. doi: 10.1177/0963662521998025. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
10
Trust as a Determinant Factor for Condom Use among Female Sex Workers in Bali, Indonesia.信任作为印度尼西亚巴厘岛女性性工作者使用避孕套的一个决定性因素。
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 15;5(3):131. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed5030131.