• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政府信任度量表(TGM)的开发与验证。

Development and validation of the Trust in Government measure (TGM).

机构信息

School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

Department of Sociology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1012 WX, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 17;23(1):2023. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16974-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-16974-0
PMID:37848848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10583387/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trust in government is associated with health behaviours and is an important consideration in population health interventions. While there is a reported decline in public trust in government across OECD countries, the tools used to measure trust are limited in their use for informing action to (re)build trust, and have limitations related to reliability and validity. To address the limitations of existing measures available to track public trust, the aim of the present work was to develop a new measure of trust in government.

METHODS

Fifty-six qualitative interviews (Aug-Oct 2021; oversampling for equity-deserving populations) were conducted to design a national survey, including factor analyses and validation testing (N = 878; June 1-14th 2022) in Canada.

RESULTS

The measure demonstrated strong internal consistency (α = 0.96) and test validity (CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.09, SRMR = 0.03), suggesting that trust in government can be measured as a single underlying construct. It also demonstrated strong criterion validity, as measured by significant (p < 0.0001) associations of scores with vaccine hesitancy, vaccine conspiracy beliefs, COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, trust in public health messaging about COVID-19, and trust in public health advice about COVID-19. We present the Trust in Government Measure (TGM); a 13-item unidimensional measure of trust in Federal government.

CONCLUSIONS

This measure can be used within high-income countries, particularly member countries within the OECD already in support of using tools to collect, publish and compare statistics. Our measure should be used by researchers and policy makers to measure trust in government as a key indicator of societal and public health.

摘要

背景

政府信任与健康行为有关,是人群健康干预的一个重要考虑因素。尽管经合组织国家报告称公众对政府的信任度有所下降,但用于衡量信任的工具在用于指导(重建)信任方面的使用有限,并且存在与可靠性和有效性相关的局限性。为了解决现有用于跟踪公众信任的工具的局限性,本研究旨在开发一种新的政府信任度衡量工具。

方法

2021 年 8 月至 10 月(代表性抽样,包括权益人群)进行了 56 次定性访谈,以设计一项全国性调查,包括因素分析和验证性测试(2022 年 6 月 1 日至 14 日,N=878)在加拿大进行。

结果

该测量工具具有较强的内部一致性(α=0.96)和测试有效性(CFI=0.96,RMSEA=0.09,SRMR=0.03),表明政府信任可以作为一个单一的潜在结构进行测量。它还具有较强的标准有效性,如与疫苗犹豫、疫苗阴谋信念、COVID-19 阴谋信念、对 COVID-19 公共卫生信息的信任以及对 COVID-19 公共卫生建议的信任的显著(p<0.0001)关联所衡量的那样。我们提出了政府信任度衡量工具(TGM);这是一个 13 项的联邦政府信任的单一维度衡量工具。

结论

该工具可在高收入国家内使用,特别是经合组织成员国已经支持使用工具收集、发布和比较统计数据。我们的衡量工具应被研究人员和政策制定者用于衡量政府信任度,将其作为社会和公共卫生的关键指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c163/10583387/de455fd49832/12889_2023_16974_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c163/10583387/de455fd49832/12889_2023_16974_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c163/10583387/de455fd49832/12889_2023_16974_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the Trust in Government measure (TGM).政府信任度量表(TGM)的开发与验证。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 17;23(1):2023. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16974-0.
2
Informing efforts beyond tailored promotional campaigns by understanding contextual factors shaping vaccine hesitancy among equity-deserving populations in Canada: an exploratory qualitative study.在加拿大,通过了解影响公平受益人群疫苗犹豫的背景因素,开展超越定制宣传活动的信息传递工作:一项探索性定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Oct 7;22(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02025-y.
3
Development and validation of the Trust in Multidimensional Healthcare Systems Scale (TIMHSS).多维医疗保健系统信任量表(TIMHSS)的开发和验证。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 May 8;23(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02162-y.
4
COVID-SCORE: A global survey to assess public perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 (COVID-SCORE-10).COVID-SCORE:评估公众对政府 COVID-19 应对措施看法的全球调查(COVID-SCORE-10)。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 6;15(10):e0240011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240011. eCollection 2020.
5
Psychometric validation of a chinese version of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy scale: a cross-sectional study.中文版 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫量表的心理测量学验证:一项横断面研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 1;22(1):765. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07746-z.
6
The COVID-19 vaccine concerns scale: Development and validation of a new measure.COVID-19 疫苗担忧量表的编制及信效度检验
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2050105. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2050105. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
7
Coronavirus conspiracy suspicions, general vaccine attitudes, trust and coronavirus information source as predictors of vaccine hesitancy among UK residents during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠病毒阴谋论怀疑、一般疫苗态度、信任和新冠病毒信息来源对英国居民在 COVID-19 大流行期间疫苗犹豫的预测。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;53(1):236-247. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001434. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
8
Belief in COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories, Level of Trust in Government Information, and Willingness to Take COVID-19 Vaccines Among Health Care Workers in Nigeria: Survey Study.尼日利亚医护人员对新冠病毒阴谋论的信念、对政府信息的信任程度以及接种新冠疫苗的意愿:调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 2;7:e41925. doi: 10.2196/41925.
9
The Mediating Roles of Attitude Toward COVID-19 Vaccination, Trust in Science and Trust in Government in the Relationship Between Anti-vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs and Vaccination Intention.对新冠疫苗接种的态度、对科学的信任和对政府的信任在反疫苗阴谋论与接种意愿关系中的中介作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:936917. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.936917. eCollection 2022.
10
Lockdown support, trust and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: Insights from the second national lockdown in France.封锁支持、信任和 COVID-19 阴谋论信仰:来自法国第二次全国封锁的洞察。
Health Policy. 2022 Nov;126(11):1103-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Anemia during pregnancy and adverse maternal outcomes in Georgia-A birth registry-based cohort study.格鲁吉亚孕期贫血与不良孕产妇结局——一项基于出生登记的队列研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 30;20(1):e0294832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294832. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A Bioweapon or a Hoax? The Link Between Distinct Conspiracy Beliefs About the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak and Pandemic Behavior.生物武器还是骗局?关于冠状病毒病(COVID-19)爆发和大流行行为的不同阴谋论之间的联系。
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2020 Nov;11(8):1110-1118. doi: 10.1177/1948550620934692.
2
Informing efforts beyond tailored promotional campaigns by understanding contextual factors shaping vaccine hesitancy among equity-deserving populations in Canada: an exploratory qualitative study.在加拿大,通过了解影响公平受益人群疫苗犹豫的背景因素,开展超越定制宣传活动的信息传递工作:一项探索性定性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Oct 7;22(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02025-y.
3
Examining factors impacting acceptance of COVID-19 countermeasures among structurally marginalised Canadians.
考察结构性弱势群体对 COVID-19 防控措施接受度的影响因素。
Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan;18(1):2263525. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2023.2263525. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
4
Canadians' trust in government in a time of crisis: Does it matter?加拿大在危机时期对政府的信任:这有关系吗?
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 8;18(9):e0290664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290664. eCollection 2023.
5
Fifty Years of Trust Research in Health Care: A Synthetic Review.五十年来医疗保健领域信任研究综述。
Milbank Q. 2023 Mar;101(1):126-178. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12598. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
6
The Vaccination Concerns in COVID-19 Scale (VaCCS): Development and validation.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫苗顾虑量表(VaCCS)的编制及信效度检验。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 14;17(3):e0264784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264784. eCollection 2022.
7
Public health guideline compliance and perceived government effectiveness during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: Findings from a longitudinal cohort study.加拿大新冠疫情期间的公共卫生指南遵守情况及对政府有效性的认知:一项纵向队列研究的结果
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 May;9:100185. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100185. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
8
Pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: an exploratory analysis of infection and fatality rates, and contextual factors associated with preparedness in 177 countries, from Jan 1, 2020, to Sept 30, 2021.大流行防范与新冠疫情:对2020年1月1日至2021年9月30日期间177个国家的感染率、死亡率以及与防范相关的背景因素进行的探索性分析。
Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1489-1512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00172-6. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
9
Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy in the Context of COVID-19: The Role of Trust and Confidence in a Seventeen-Country Survey.理解 COVID-19 背景下的疫苗犹豫:在十七国调查中信任和信心的作用。
Int J Public Health. 2021 May 14;66:636255. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2021.636255. eCollection 2021.
10
When and How Trust in Government Leads to Compliance with COVID-19 Precautionary Measures.对政府的信任何时以及如何导致对新冠疫情预防措施的遵守。
J Bus Res. 2022 Feb;139:1275-1283. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.036. Epub 2021 Oct 29.