Mojdehi Samaneh, Brady Bernadette, Tang Clarice, Peiris Casey L
HealthAbility, Melbourne, Australia.
Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Disabil Rehabil. 2025 Jan;47(2):314-323. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2349761. Epub 2024 May 8.
The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of multidisciplinary, activity-based interventions on adults with chronic musculoskeletal or widespread pain who identify as ethnoculturally diverse (ECD) compared to adults belonging to the predominant culture of the host country.
Online databases Medline, CINAHL, AMED, Psych Info and PubMed were searched from the earliest date available until April 2023. The quality of the included studies were assessed against the Risk of Bias in Non Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I). Postintervention data were analyzed using meta-analyses and the certainty of evidence determined using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach (GRADE).
Nine cohort studies with 3467 participants living in America and north-western European countries were included. ECD adults had higher pain intensity (SMD 1.36, 95%CI 0.29 to 2.35, = 0.03), higher levels of depression (SMD 0.96, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.52, < 0.01) and a nonsignificant difference in pain-related disability (SMD -1.45, 95%CI -3.28 to 0.39, = 0.12) following multidisciplinary pain intervention compared to adults of the predominant culture.
Adults from ECD backgrounds in Western nations have poorer outcomes after multidisciplinary, activity-based chronic pain interventions compared to adults from predominant cultural groups in these countries suggesting program adaptations may be required.
本综述的目的是评估多学科、基于活动的干预措施对自我认定为种族文化多元(ECD)的慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛或广泛性疼痛成年人的有效性,并与属于东道国主流文化的成年人进行比较。
检索在线数据库Medline、CINAHL、AMED、Psych Info和PubMed,检索时间从各数据库最早可用日期至2023年4月。根据干预非随机研究的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)评估纳入研究的质量。使用荟萃分析对干预后数据进行分析,并使用推荐分级、评估、制定和评价方法(GRADE)确定证据的确定性。
纳入了9项队列研究,共3467名生活在美国和西北欧洲国家的参与者。与主流文化的成年人相比,ECD成年人在多学科疼痛干预后疼痛强度更高(标准化均数差1.36,95%置信区间0.29至2.35,P = 0.03),抑郁水平更高(标准化均数差0.96,95%置信区间0.40至1.52,P < 0.01),且疼痛相关残疾无显著差异(标准化均数差-1.45,95%置信区间-3.28至0.39,P = 0.12)。
与西方国家主流文化群体的成年人相比,来自ECD背景的成年人在多学科、基于活动的慢性疼痛干预后效果较差,这表明可能需要对项目进行调整。