Blue Rachel, Yang Andrew I, Ajmera Sonia, Spadola Michael, Howard Susanna, Saylany Anissa, Kvint Svetlana, Harber Alexander, Daly Megan, Shekhtman Emily, Nair Anjana, Deshpande Riddhi, Lee John Y K
Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2023 May 11;85(3):287-294. doi: 10.1055/a-2065-9650. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Arterial compression of the trigeminal nerve at the root entry zone has been the long-attributed cause of compressive trigeminal neuralgia despite numerous studies reporting distal and/or venous compression. The impact of compression type on patient outcomes has not been fully elucidated. We categorized vascular compression (VC) based on vessel and location of compression to correlate pain outcomes based on compression type. A retrospective video review of 217 patients undergoing endoscopic microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia categorizing VC into five distinct types, proximal arterial compression (VC1), proximal venous compression (VC2), distal arterial compression (VC3), distal venous compression (VC4), and no VC (VC5). VC type was correlated with postoperative pain outcomes at 1 month ( = 179) and last follow-up (mean = 42.9 mo, = 134). At 1 month and longest follow-up, respectively, pain was rated as "much improved" or "very much improved" in 89 69% of patients with VC1, 86.6 and 62.5% of patients with VC2, 100 and 87.5% of patients with VC3, 83 and 62.5% of patients with VC4, and 100 and 100% of patients with VC5. Multivariate analysis demonstrated VC4 as a significant negative of predictor pain outcomes at 1 month, but not longest follow-up, and advanced age as a significant positive predictor. The degree of clinical improvement in all types of VC was excellent, but at longest follow-up VC type was not a significant predictor out outcome. However distal venous compression was significantly associated with worse outcomes at 1 month.
尽管有大量研究报告了三叉神经远侧和/或静脉受压情况,但三叉神经在神经根入区的动脉受压长期以来一直被认为是压迫性三叉神经痛的病因。压迫类型对患者预后的影响尚未完全阐明。
我们根据压迫的血管和位置对血管压迫(VC)进行分类,以根据压迫类型关联疼痛预后。
对217例行内镜下微血管减压术治疗三叉神经痛的患者进行回顾性视频分析,将VC分为五种不同类型:近端动脉压迫(VC1)、近端静脉压迫(VC2)、远端动脉压迫(VC3)、远端静脉压迫(VC4)和无VC(VC5)。VC类型与术后1个月(n = 179)和末次随访(平均42.9个月,n = 134)时的疼痛预后相关。
在1个月和最长随访时,VC1患者中分别有89%和69%的疼痛评为“明显改善”或“非常明显改善”,VC2患者中分别为86.6%和62.5%,VC3患者中分别为100%和87.5%,VC4患者中分别为83%和62.5%,VC5患者中分别为100%和100%。多因素分析显示,VC4是1个月时疼痛预后的显著负性预测因素,但不是最长随访时的,高龄是显著的正性预测因素。
所有类型VC的临床改善程度都很好,但在最长随访时,VC类型不是预后的显著预测因素。然而,远端静脉压迫在1个月时与较差的预后显著相关。