Suppr超能文献

采用LEMON标准进行气道检查与采用IDS标准评估气管插管难度之间的关系。

Relationship Between Airway Examination with LEMON Criteria and Difficulty of Tracheal Intubation with IDS Criteria.

作者信息

Derakhshan Pooya, Nikoubakht Nasim, Alimian Mahzad, Mohammadi Sadaf

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences ( IUMS ), Tehran, Iran.

Iran University of Medical Sciences ( IUMS ), Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jan 16;13(6):e142921. doi: 10.5812/aapm-142921. eCollection 2023 Dec.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tracheal intubation is a common technique used to secure a patient's airway, which is crucial in anesthesia. Successful tracheal intubation depends on various factors, including the assessment of the patient's airway before the procedure. In recent years, scoring systems, such as LEMON (an acronym for the assessment of the airway's appearance, identification of any dental issues, evaluation of Mallampati classification, assessment of airway obstruction, and examination of neck mobility) and intubation difficulty scale (IDS) have gained attention. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the LEMON criteria and IDS in tracheal intubation. The goal was to provide valuable insights that can assist medical professionals in optimizing their approach to airway management by analyzing clinical data, assessing patient outcomes, and evaluating the consistency between these scoring systems.

METHODS

This study was based on a descriptive-analytical study involving a group of patients requiring intubation. This study examined 105 patients scheduled for elective surgeries, aged between 19 and 60 years, without specific underlying diseases, such as laryngeal cancer, temporomandibular joint stiffness, or significant tongue enlargement, and with a body mass index (BMI) below 40 kg/m². Initially, expert anesthesiologists assessed the patients using the LEMON criteria, and then the degree of intubation difficulty was measured using the IDS scoring system. Finally, these two criteria were compared.

RESULTS

In this study, there was a significant correlation between the LEMON score and the IDS score (P < 0.001). The difficult intubation group (IDS score higher than 0) had higher LEMON scores (with the highest score equal to 4) than the non-difficult intubation group (IDS score of 0) (P = 0.017). The average LEMON and IDS scores were 3.11 and 1.35, respectively. Among the participants, 96.2% had an intubation difficulty score of ≤ 5; nevertheless, 3.8% had a score of > 5. Additionally, limited neck mobility emerged as the sole independent predictor of intubation difficulty (P = 0.002, odds ratio = 6.152).

CONCLUSIONS

The LEMON score is associated with difficult intubation in adult patients requiring intubation.

摘要

背景

气管插管是确保患者气道安全的常用技术,在麻醉中至关重要。成功的气管插管取决于多种因素,包括术前对患者气道的评估。近年来,诸如LEMON(气道外观评估、牙齿问题识别、Mallampati分级评估、气道梗阻评估和颈部活动度检查的首字母缩写)和插管困难量表(IDS)等评分系统受到了关注。本研究旨在探讨气管插管中LEMON标准与IDS之间的关系。目标是通过分析临床数据、评估患者预后以及评估这些评分系统之间的一致性,提供有价值的见解,以帮助医学专业人员优化气道管理方法。

方法

本研究基于一项描述性分析研究,涉及一组需要插管的患者。本研究检查了105例计划进行择期手术的患者,年龄在19至60岁之间,无特定基础疾病,如喉癌、颞下颌关节僵硬或明显的舌肿大,体重指数(BMI)低于40kg/m²。最初,专家麻醉医师使用LEMON标准对患者进行评估,然后使用IDS评分系统测量插管困难程度。最后,对这两个标准进行比较。

结果

在本研究中,LEMON评分与IDS评分之间存在显著相关性(P<0.001)。困难插管组(IDS评分高于0)的LEMON评分(最高分为4)高于非困难插管组(IDS评分为0)(P = 0.017)。LEMON和IDS的平均评分分别为3.11和1.35。在参与者中,96.2%的插管困难评分为≤5;然而,3.8%的评分>5。此外,颈部活动受限是插管困难的唯一独立预测因素(P = 0.002,比值比=6.152)。

结论

LEMON评分与需要插管的成年患者的困难插管有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be67/11078223/6f5cef29833f/aapm-13-6-142921-i001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验