Anesthesiology Research Team, Department of Anesthesiology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran..
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;37:99-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.12.010. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
Difficult intubation is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity related to anesthesia. We decided to evaluate the value of Modified Mallampati Score, Upper Lip Bite Test and Facial Angle in the prediction of difficult intubation.
In a prospective descriptive study, data from 132 patients who were candidates for elective maxillofacial surgeries under general anesthesia were gathered. Facial Angles were measured by a maxillofacial surgeon according to cephalometry. The Modified Mallampati Score and Upper Lip Bite Test were first measured by an anesthesiologist and then another anesthesiologist was assigned to record the Cormack and Lehane score during the intubation. Grades 3 and 4 were considered as difficult intubation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and Youden index were calculated for all tests.
Difficult intubation was reported in 12% of the patients. Facial Angle≤82.5° can predict difficult intubation with 87.5% sensitivity and 88.8% specificity. Among the three tests, a high Modified Mallampati Score had the highest specificity (94.5%) and a high Modified Mallampati Score and Facial Angle (FA≤82.5°) had the highest sensitivity (87.5%). The highest NPV, sensitivity and Youden index were observed when using Facial Angle with the Modified Mallampati Score or with Upper Lip Bite Test.
Facial Angle has a high sensitivity, NPV and Youden index for the prediction of difficult intubation, but the best result is achieved when Facial Angle is used in combination with either the Modified Mallampati Score or Upper Lip Bit Test.
困难插管是与麻醉相关的死亡率和发病率的重要原因。我们决定评估改良 Mallampati 评分、上唇咬测试和面部角度在预测困难插管中的价值。
在一项前瞻性描述性研究中,收集了 132 名拟行全身麻醉下择期颌面手术患者的数据。颌面外科医生根据头影测量法测量面部角度。改良 Mallampati 评分和上唇咬测试首先由麻醉师测量,然后由另一名麻醉师在插管过程中记录 Cormack 和 Lehane 评分。等级 3 和 4 被认为是困难插管。计算了所有测试的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和 Youden 指数。
12%的患者报告存在困难插管。面部角度≤82.5°可预测困难插管,敏感性为 87.5%,特异性为 88.8%。在这三个测试中,高改良 Mallampati 评分具有最高的特异性(94.5%),高改良 Mallampati 评分和面部角度(FA≤82.5°)具有最高的敏感性(87.5%)。使用改良 Mallampati 评分或上唇咬测试结合面部角度时,观察到最高的 NPV、敏感性和 Youden 指数。
面部角度对预测困难插管具有较高的敏感性、NPV 和 Youden 指数,但与改良 Mallampati 评分或上唇咬测试联合使用时效果最佳。