• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强迫障碍中的动作序列学习、习惯和自动化。

Action sequence learning, habits, and automaticity in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Elife. 2024 May 9;12:RP87346. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87346.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.87346
PMID:38722306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11081634/
Abstract

This study investigates the goal/habit imbalance theory of compulsion in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), which postulates enhanced habit formation, increased automaticity, and impaired goal/habit arbitration. It directly tests these hypotheses using newly developed behavioral tasks. First, OCD patients and healthy participants were trained daily for a month using a smartphone app to perform chunked action sequences. Despite similar procedural learning and attainment of habitual performance (measured by an objective automaticity criterion) by both groups, OCD patients self-reported higher subjective habitual tendencies via a recently developed questionnaire. Subsequently, in a re-evaluation task assessing choices between established automatic and novel goal-directed actions, both groups were sensitive to re-evaluation based on monetary feedback. However, OCD patients, especially those with higher compulsive symptoms and habitual tendencies, showed a clear preference for trained/habitual sequences when choices were based on physical effort, possibly due to their higher attributed intrinsic value. These patients also used the habit-training app more extensively and reported symptom relief post-study. The tendency to attribute higher intrinsic value to familiar actions may be a potential mechanism leading to compulsions and an important addition to the goal/habit imbalance hypothesis in OCD. We also highlight the potential of smartphone app training as a habit reversal therapeutic tool.

摘要

本研究调查了强迫症(OCD)中强迫的目标/习惯失衡理论,该理论假定习惯形成增强、自动化增加和目标/习惯仲裁受损。它使用新开发的行为任务直接检验这些假设。首先,OCD 患者和健康参与者使用智能手机应用程序进行为期一个月的日常训练,以执行分块的动作序列。尽管两组患者在程序学习和习惯性表现(通过客观自动化标准衡量)方面相似,但 OCD 患者通过最近开发的问卷自我报告更高的主观习惯性倾向。随后,在评估在既定自动和新颖目标导向动作之间进行选择的重新评估任务中,两组患者都对基于金钱反馈的重新评估敏感。然而,OCD 患者,尤其是那些具有更高强迫症状和习惯性倾向的患者,在基于体力的选择中明显更喜欢训练/习惯性序列,这可能是由于他们赋予了更高的内在价值。这些患者还更广泛地使用了习惯训练应用程序,并在研究后报告症状缓解。将更高的内在价值归因于熟悉动作的倾向可能是导致强迫的潜在机制,也是 OCD 中目标/习惯失衡假说的重要补充。我们还强调了智能手机应用程序训练作为习惯反转治疗工具的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/36282f05ce66/elife-87346-sa2-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/d04b868fca4c/elife-87346-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/3e370cbb93a9/elife-87346-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/6ebb6762e0d2/elife-87346-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/f280e2d48d63/elife-87346-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/40328764aba1/elife-87346-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/599667928a27/elife-87346-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/99c433b2aab4/elife-87346-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/5d1213b0bfc9/elife-87346-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/cb062e21287e/elife-87346-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/7999f0f79103/elife-87346-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/a6bc45cc48eb/elife-87346-app1-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/44f23fa904df/elife-87346-app1-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/f7a5a4bc57c8/elife-87346-app1-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/f2d18deeb3c0/elife-87346-app1-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/8da537a4b6be/elife-87346-app1-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/c9ab8a9db5cf/elife-87346-sa2-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/36282f05ce66/elife-87346-sa2-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/d04b868fca4c/elife-87346-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/3e370cbb93a9/elife-87346-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/6ebb6762e0d2/elife-87346-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/f280e2d48d63/elife-87346-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/40328764aba1/elife-87346-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/599667928a27/elife-87346-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/99c433b2aab4/elife-87346-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/5d1213b0bfc9/elife-87346-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/cb062e21287e/elife-87346-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/7999f0f79103/elife-87346-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/a6bc45cc48eb/elife-87346-app1-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/44f23fa904df/elife-87346-app1-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/f7a5a4bc57c8/elife-87346-app1-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/f2d18deeb3c0/elife-87346-app1-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/8da537a4b6be/elife-87346-app1-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/c9ab8a9db5cf/elife-87346-sa2-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13c2/11081634/36282f05ce66/elife-87346-sa2-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Action sequence learning, habits, and automaticity in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫障碍中的动作序列学习、习惯和自动化。
Elife. 2024 May 9;12:RP87346. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87346.
2
Enhanced avoidance habits in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症中增强的回避习惯。
Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Apr 15;75(8):631-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.02.002. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
3
Disruption in the balance between goal-directed behavior and habit learning in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症中目标导向行为和习惯学习之间平衡的破坏。
Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Jul;168(7):718-26. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10071062. Epub 2011 May 15.
4
Instrumental learning in a mouse model for obsessive-compulsive disorder: Impaired habit formation in Sapap3 mutants.在强迫症小鼠模型中进行的工具性学习:Sapap3 突变体中习惯形成受损。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2020 Feb;168:107162. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107162. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
5
Action-Outcome Knowledge Dissociates From Behavior in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Following Contingency Degradation.行为-结果知识在强迫症患者进行条件性消退后与行为分离。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019 Feb;4(2):200-209. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.09.014. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
6
Motivation and value influences in the relative balance of goal-directed and habitual behaviours in obsessive-compulsive disorder.动机和价值影响在强迫症中目标导向行为与习惯行为的相对平衡中所起的作用。
Transl Psychiatry. 2015 Nov 3;5(11):e670. doi: 10.1038/tp.2015.165.
7
The impact of illness duration on brain activity in goal-directed and habit-learning systems in obsessive-compulsive disorder progression: A resting-state functional imaging study.疾病持续时间对强迫症进展中目标导向和习惯学习系统大脑活动的影响:一项静息态功能成像研究。
Neuroscience. 2024 Aug 16;553:74-88. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.06.018. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
8
Goal-directed learning and obsessive-compulsive disorder.目标导向学习与强迫症
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Nov 5;369(1655). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0475.
9
Functional neuroimaging of avoidance habits in obsessive-compulsive disorder.强迫症中回避习惯的功能性神经影像学研究
Am J Psychiatry. 2015 Mar 1;172(3):284-93. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14040525. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
10
Counterfactual processing of economic action-outcome alternatives in obsessive-compulsive disorder: further evidence of impaired goal-directed behavior.强迫症中经济行动-结果替代方案的反事实加工:目标导向行为受损的进一步证据。
Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Apr 15;75(8):639-46. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic prefrontal coupling coordinates adaptive decision-making.动态前额叶耦合协调适应性决策。
Res Sq. 2025 Apr 9:rs.3.rs-6296852. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6296852/v1.
2
Individual differences in probabilistic learning and updating predictive representations in individuals with obsessive-compulsive tendencies.有强迫倾向个体在概率学习和更新预测表征方面的个体差异。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06786-4.
3
Signatures of Perseveration and Heuristic-Based Directed Exploration in Two-Step Sequential Decision Task Behaviour.

本文引用的文献

1
Perseveration and Shifting in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder as a Function of Uncertainty, Punishment, and Serotonergic Medication.强迫症中的固着与转换:作为不确定性、惩罚和5-羟色胺能药物作用的函数
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2023 Jul 13;4(1):326-335. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2023.06.004. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
A novel free-operant framework enables experimental habit induction in humans.一种新颖的自由操作框架使人类能够进行实验性习惯诱导。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Apr;56(4):3937-3958. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02263-6. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
3
Active tactile discrimination is coupled with and modulated by the cardiac cycle.
两步序贯决策任务行为中持续重复和基于启发式的定向探索特征
Comput Psychiatr. 2025 Feb 11;9(1):39-62. doi: 10.5334/cpsy.101. eCollection 2025.
4
Subjective Assessment of Rdoc-Related Constructs in Addiction and Compulsive Disorders: A Scoping Review.成瘾和强迫障碍中与Rdoc相关结构的主观评估:一项范围综述
Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2024 Dec;21(6):477-508. doi: 10.36131/cnfioritieditore20240603.
5
Distinct cognitive and functional connectivity features from healthy cohorts can identify clinical obsessive-compulsive disorder.来自健康队列的独特认知和功能连接特征能够识别临床强迫症。
medRxiv. 2024 Sep 6:2024.09.02.24312960. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.02.24312960.
6
Comparative Roles of the Caudate and Putamen in the Serial Order of Behavior: Effects of Striatal Glutamate Receptor Blockade on Variable versus Fixed Spatial Self-Ordered Sequencing in Marmosets.尾状核和壳核在行为序列中的比较作用:纹状体谷氨酸受体阻断对狨猴可变与固定空间自我有序序列的影响。
eNeuro. 2024 Mar 25;11(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0541-23.2024. Print 2024 Mar.
主动触觉辨别与心动周期相关联并受其调制。
Elife. 2022 Oct 12;11:e78126. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78126.
4
Making habits measurable beyond what they are not: A focus on associative dual-process models.使习惯可测量,超越其本身:关注联想双过程模型。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Nov;142:104869. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104869. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
5
Cognitive Rigidity, Habitual Tendencies, and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms: Individual Differences and Compensatory Interactions.认知僵化、习惯倾向与强迫症状:个体差异与代偿性相互作用
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 27;13:865896. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.865896. eCollection 2022.
6
Habitual or hyper-controlled behavior: OCD symptoms and explicit sequence learning.习惯性或过度控制行为:强迫症症状与明确序列学习。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;75:101723. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2022.101723. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
7
Determining the effects of training duration on the behavioral expression of habitual control in humans: a multilaboratory investigation.确定训练持续时间对人类习惯性控制行为表现的影响:一项多实验室研究。
Learn Mem. 2021 Dec 15;29(1):16-28. doi: 10.1101/lm.053413.121. Print 2022 Jan.
8
Association of Environmental Uncertainty With Altered Decision-making and Learning Mechanisms in Youths With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.环境不确定性与强迫症青少年决策和学习机制改变的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2136195. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.36195.
9
Context, attention, and the switch between habit and goal-direction in behavior.情境、注意力与行为中习惯和目标导向之间的转换。
Learn Behav. 2021 Dec;49(4):349-362. doi: 10.3758/s13420-021-00488-z. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
10
Advice on comparing two independent samples of circular data in biology.生物学中比较两组独立的圆形数据的建议。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 13;11(1):20337. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99299-5.