Clardy Stacey L, Pittock Sean J, Aktas Orhan, Nakahara Jin, Isobe Noriko, Centonze Diego, Fam Sami, Kielhorn Adrian, Yu Jeffrey C, Jansen Jeroen, Zhang Ina
Department of Neurology, University of Utah, 175 Medical Drive North, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Neurol Ther. 2024 Jun;13(3):535-549. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00597-7. Epub 2024 May 9.
Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody-positive (AQP4-Ab+) neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a complement-mediated autoimmune disease in which unpredictable and relapsing attacks on the central nervous system cause irreversible and accumulating damage. Comparative efficacy of new NMOSD therapies, such as ravulizumab, with established therapies is critical in making informed treatment decisions.
Efficacy of ravulizumab relative to established AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD treatments, such as eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab, was evaluated in a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA). Data were extracted from trials identified by a systematic literature review. The final evidence base consisted of 17 publications representing five unique and global studies (PREVENT, N-MOmentum, SAkuraSky, SAkuraStar, and CHAMPION-NMOSD). The primary endpoint was time-to-first relapse; other outcomes included annualized relapse rates (ARRs).
For patients receiving monotherapy (monoclonal antibody only), ravulizumab was associated with a lower risk of relapse than inebilizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.09, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.02, 0.57) or satralizumab (HR 0.08, 95% CrI 0.01, 0.55) and was comparable to eculizumab (HR 0.86, 95% Crl 0.16, 4.52). Ravulizumab + immunosuppressive therapy (IST) was associated with a lower risk of relapse than satralizumab + IST (HR 0.15, 95% CrI 0.03, 0.78); the comparison with eculizumab + IST suggested no difference. No patients treated with inebilizumab received background IST and were thus excluded from analysis. The ARR with ravulizumab monotherapy was 98% lower compared with inebilizumab (rate ratio [RR] 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.38) and satralizumab (RR 0.02, 95% Crl 0.00, 0.42) monotherapies. The ARR with ravulizumab ± IST showed the strongest treatment-effect estimates compared with other interventions.
In the absence of head-to-head randomized controlled trials, NMA results suggest ravulizumab, a C5 inhibitor, is likely to be more effective in preventing NMOSD relapse in patients with AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD when compared with other treatments having different methods of action.
抗水通道蛋白4抗体阳性(AQP4-Ab+)视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍(NMOSD)是一种补体介导的自身免疫性疾病,对中枢神经系统不可预测的复发攻击会导致不可逆转的累积性损伤。新型NMOSD疗法(如ravulizumab)与现有疗法的疗效比较对于做出明智的治疗决策至关重要。
在一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)中评估了ravulizumab相对于现有AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD治疗(如依库珠单抗、inebilizumab和萨特利珠单抗)的疗效。数据从通过系统文献综述确定的试验中提取。最终的证据库由17篇代表五项独特的全球研究(PREVENT、N-MOmentum、SAkuraSky、SAkuraStar和CHAMPION-NMOSD)的出版物组成。主要终点是首次复发时间;其他结局包括年化复发率(ARR)。
对于接受单药治疗(仅单克隆抗体)的患者,ravulizumab与inebilizumab(风险比[HR] 0.09,95%可信区间[CrI] 0.02,0.57)或萨特利珠单抗(HR 0.08,95% CrI 0.01,0.55)相比,复发风险更低,且与依库珠单抗相当(HR 0.86,95% Crl 0.16,4.52)。Ravulizumab联合免疫抑制治疗(IST)与萨特利珠单抗联合IST相比,复发风险更低(HR 0.15,95% CrI 0.03,0.78);与依库珠单抗联合IST的比较表明无差异。接受inebilizumab治疗的患者未接受背景IST,因此被排除在分析之外。Ravulizumab单药治疗的ARR与inebilizumab(率比[RR] 0.02,95% Crl 0.00,0.38)和萨特利珠单抗(RR 0.02,95% Crl 0.00,0.42)单药治疗相比降低了98%。与其他干预措施相比,ravulizumab ± IST的ARR显示出最强的治疗效果估计。
在缺乏头对头随机对照试验的情况下,NMA结果表明,与其他作用方式不同的治疗方法相比,C5抑制剂ravulizumab在预防AQP4-Ab+ NMOSD患者的NMOSD复发方面可能更有效。