• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于惩罚似然回归的罕见事件的网络荟萃分析。

Network meta-analysis of rare events using penalized likelihood regression.

机构信息

Université Paris Cité, Research Center of Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS-U1153), INSERM, Paris, France.

MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2022 Nov 20;41(26):5203-5219. doi: 10.1002/sim.9562. Epub 2022 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1002/sim.9562
PMID:36054668
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9805041/
Abstract

Network meta-analysis (NMA) of rare events has attracted little attention in the literature. Until recently, networks of interventions with rare events were analyzed using the inverse-variance NMA approach. However, when events are rare the normal approximations made by this model can be poor and effect estimates are potentially biased. Other methods for the synthesis of such data are the recent extension of the Mantel-Haenszel approach to NMA or the use of the noncentral hypergeometric distribution. In this article, we suggest a new common-effect NMA approach that can be applied even in networks of interventions with extremely low or even zero number of events without requiring study exclusion or arbitrary imputations. Our method is based on the implementation of the penalized likelihood function proposed by Firth for bias reduction of the maximum likelihood estimate to the logistic expression of the NMA model. A limitation of our method is that heterogeneity cannot be taken into account as an additive parameter as in most meta-analytical models. However, we account for heterogeneity by incorporating a multiplicative overdispersion term using a two-stage approach. We show through simulation that our method performs consistently well across all tested scenarios and most often results in smaller bias than other available methods. We also illustrate the use of our method through two clinical examples. We conclude that our "penalized likelihood NMA" approach is promising for the analysis of binary outcomes with rare events especially for networks with very few studies per comparison and very low control group risks.

摘要

网络荟萃分析(NMA)对罕见事件的关注较少。直到最近,罕见事件干预措施的网络仍采用逆方差 NMA 方法进行分析。然而,当事件很少时,该模型的正态逼近可能很差,并且效果估计可能存在偏差。分析此类数据的其他方法是 Mantel-Haenszel 方法在 NMA 中的最新扩展,或者使用非中心超几何分布。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的通用效应 NMA 方法,即使在干预措施网络中罕见事件甚至零事件的情况下也可以应用,而无需排除研究或任意插补。我们的方法基于 Firth 提出的惩罚似然函数的实施,该函数可减少最大似然估计对 NMA 模型逻辑表达式的偏差。我们方法的一个局限性是,由于大多数荟萃分析模型中都将异质性作为附加参数来考虑,因此不能将异质性作为附加参数来考虑。但是,我们通过使用两阶段方法结合乘法过离散项来考虑异质性。通过模拟,我们证明我们的方法在所有测试场景中都表现良好,并且通常比其他可用方法产生的偏差更小。我们还通过两个临床示例说明了我们方法的使用。我们得出结论,我们的“惩罚似然 NMA”方法对于分析罕见事件的二分类结局很有前途,特别是对于每比较研究很少且对照组风险很低的网络。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/c7717d6fee3d/SIM-41-5203-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/92b822d01b7f/SIM-41-5203-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/3df33145b2a4/SIM-41-5203-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/ce6fcd177fbb/SIM-41-5203-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/c1120335f910/SIM-41-5203-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/fa7776b560db/SIM-41-5203-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/4c328ffdfa71/SIM-41-5203-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/44ceaf9053f3/SIM-41-5203-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/c7717d6fee3d/SIM-41-5203-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/92b822d01b7f/SIM-41-5203-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/3df33145b2a4/SIM-41-5203-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/ce6fcd177fbb/SIM-41-5203-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/c1120335f910/SIM-41-5203-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/fa7776b560db/SIM-41-5203-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/4c328ffdfa71/SIM-41-5203-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/44ceaf9053f3/SIM-41-5203-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a9f/9805041/c7717d6fee3d/SIM-41-5203-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Network meta-analysis of rare events using penalized likelihood regression.基于惩罚似然回归的罕见事件的网络荟萃分析。
Stat Med. 2022 Nov 20;41(26):5203-5219. doi: 10.1002/sim.9562. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
2
Network meta-analysis of rare events using the Mantel-Haenszel method.基于 Mantel-Haenszel 法的罕见事件的网状荟萃分析。
Stat Med. 2019 Jul 20;38(16):2992-3012. doi: 10.1002/sim.8158. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Penalized maximum likelihood inference under the mixture cure model in sparse data.稀疏数据下混合治愈模型的惩罚极大似然推断。
Stat Med. 2023 Jun 15;42(13):2134-2161. doi: 10.1002/sim.9715. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
5
On estimation for accelerated failure time models with small or rare event survival data.小样本或稀有事件生存数据的加速失效时间模型估计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jun 11;22(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01638-1.
6
When does the use of individual patient data in network meta-analysis make a difference? A simulation study.网络荟萃分析中使用个体患者数据何时会产生影响?一项模拟研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jan 13;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01198-2.
7
Applications of simple and accessible methods for meta-analysis involving rare events: A simulation study.简单易用的方法在罕见事件荟萃分析中的应用:一项模拟研究。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Jul;30(7):1589-1608. doi: 10.1177/09622802211022385. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
8
The impact of continuity correction methods in Cochrane reviews with single-zero trials with rare events: A meta-epidemiological study.连续性校正方法对罕见事件单零试验的 Cochrane 综述的影响:一项荟萃流行病学研究。
Res Synth Methods. 2024 Sep;15(5):769-779. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1720. Epub 2024 May 15.
9
Nonparametric estimation of the random effects distribution for the risk or rate ratio in rare events meta-analysis with the arm-based and contrast-based approaches.基于手臂和对照的方法在稀有事件荟萃分析中估计风险或率比的随机效应分布的非参数估计。
Stat Med. 2024 Feb 20;43(4):706-730. doi: 10.1002/sim.9981. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
10
Bias correction of risk estimates in vaccine safety studies with rare adverse events using a self-controlled case series design.应用自身对照病例系列设计校正罕见不良事件疫苗安全性研究中风险估计的偏倚。
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Dec 15;178(12):1750-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt211. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Network Meta-analysis of 1.5% Ruxolitinib Cream Versus Systemic Agents in the Treatment of Moderate Atopic Dermatitis.1.5%鲁索替尼乳膏与全身用药治疗中度特应性皮炎的网状Meta分析
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01503-1.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological interventions for schizophrenia non-responsive to prior treatment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.对先前治疗无反应的精神分裂症药物干预的疗效和耐受性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jun 7;84:103291. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103291. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Effect of methodological choices and inclusion criteria on network meta-analysis results in psoriasis.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis results do not reflect the real safety of biologics in psoriasis.荟萃分析结果不能反映生物制剂治疗银屑病的真实安全性。
Br J Dermatol. 2021 Mar;184(3):415-424. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19244. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
2
Exclusion of studies with no events in both arms in meta-analysis impacted the conclusions.荟萃分析中排除双臂均无事件的研究影响了结论。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
3
A comparison of arm-based and contrast-based models for network meta-analysis.基于臂和基于对照的网络荟萃分析模型比较
方法学选择和纳入标准对银屑病网络荟萃分析结果的影响。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02558-6.
4
Comparative safety of istradefylline in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and real-world studies.异他茶碱在帕金森病中的比较安全性:随机对照试验和真实世界研究的系统评价
Clin Park Relat Disord. 2025 Feb 17;12:100307. doi: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2025.100307. eCollection 2025.
5
Comparative efficacy and safety of talazoparib plus enzalutamide and other first-line treatments for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.他拉唑帕利联合恩杂鲁胺与其他一线治疗方案用于转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌的疗效和安全性比较
Oncologist. 2025 Mar 10;30(3). doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae237.
6
Risk of Cardiovascular Events with Cyclin-Dependent Kinases 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) Inhibitors among Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.晚期乳腺癌患者中细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4和6(CDK 4/6)抑制剂与心血管事件风险:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 9;24(11):309. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2411309. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
Network Meta-analysis of Ravulizumab and Alternative Interventions for the Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.瑞武利单抗与其他治疗视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍干预措施的网状Meta分析
Neurol Ther. 2024 Jun;13(3):535-549. doi: 10.1007/s40120-024-00597-7. Epub 2024 May 9.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药物治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 12;7(7):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub6.
Stat Med. 2019 Nov 30;38(27):5197-5213. doi: 10.1002/sim.8360. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
4
Network meta-analysis of rare events using the Mantel-Haenszel method.基于 Mantel-Haenszel 法的罕见事件的网状荟萃分析。
Stat Med. 2019 Jul 20;38(16):2992-3012. doi: 10.1002/sim.8158. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
5
Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods.运用模拟研究评估统计方法。
Stat Med. 2019 May 20;38(11):2074-2102. doi: 10.1002/sim.8086. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
6
Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria.二项逻辑预测模型的样本量:超越变量标准的事件数。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Aug;28(8):2455-2474. doi: 10.1177/0962280218784726. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
7
Practical guide to the meta-analysis of rare events.罕见事件荟萃分析实用指南。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 May;21(2):72-76. doi: 10.1136/eb-2018-102911. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
8
A comparison of seven random-effects models for meta-analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio.七种用于估计汇总优势比的荟萃分析随机效应模型的比较。
Stat Med. 2018 Mar 30;37(7):1059-1085. doi: 10.1002/sim.7588. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
9
Separation in Logistic Regression: Causes, Consequences, and Control.逻辑回归中的分离:原因、后果与控制。
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Apr 1;187(4):864-870. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx299.
10
Heterogeneity: multiplicative, additive or both?异质性:相乘性、相加性还是两者皆有?
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Mar;8(1):119-120. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1223. Epub 2016 Oct 17.