Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
PLoS One. 2024 May 9;19(5):e0301337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301337. eCollection 2024.
This study was to examine characteristics concerning frequent users of emergency medical services (EMS) transport by comparing patients who used EMS transport frequently for one year and those who used EMS transport for more than two years consecutively.
A retrospective review for frequent use of EMS transport was conducted. The patients from the fire stations that transported more than 70% of all EMS transport to the study hospital emergency department (ED) were included. The study subjects were divided into consecutive group (frequent EMS transport for ≥ two years consecutively) and non-consecutive group (frequent EMS transport for only one year). Characteristics of patients who were frequent users of EMS transport and those of all cases with EMS transport were examined.
Of the total 205 patients and 1204 cases of frequent EMS transport, 85 (42%) patients and 755 (63%) cases were in the consecutive group. Patients in the consecutive group were more likely to have risky alcohol use, unemployed state, and medical aid type of payment for ED treatment than those in the non-consecutive group. More patients had previous experience of EMS transport to the study hospital ED in the consecutive group and the number of cases with alcohol ingestion was higher in the consecutive group. Elapsed time from EMS call to ED arrival was longer for the consecutive group.
Risky alcohol use, unemployed state, and previous experience of EMS transport were associated with consecutive and frequent use of EMS transport in frequent users of EMS transport.
本研究旨在通过比较一年内频繁使用急诊医疗服务(EMS)转运的患者和连续两年以上频繁使用 EMS 转运的患者,探讨频繁使用 EMS 转运的特征。
回顾性分析频繁使用 EMS 转运的情况。选择向研究医院急诊科转运超过 70%所有 EMS 转运的消防站的患者。将研究对象分为连续组(连续两年以上频繁使用 EMS 转运)和非连续组(仅使用 EMS 转运一年)。检查频繁使用 EMS 转运患者和所有 EMS 转运患者的特征。
在 205 名患者和 1204 例频繁使用 EMS 转运的患者中,85 名(42%)患者和 755 例(63%)患者属于连续组。与非连续组相比,连续组患者更有可能存在风险饮酒、失业状态和医疗补助类型的 ED 治疗支付方式。连续组中有更多患者有之前使用 EMS 转运到研究医院急诊科的经历,且连续组中酒精摄入的病例数更高。连续组从 EMS 呼叫到 ED 到达的时间间隔较长。
风险饮酒、失业状态和之前使用 EMS 转运与频繁使用 EMS 转运的连续和频繁使用有关。