Norman Chenelle, Mello Michael, Choi Bryan
Brown University, School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Brown University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island; Rhode Island Hospital, Injury Prevention Center, Providence, Rhode Island; Brown University, School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;17(1):39-45. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.10.28508. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
This retrospective cohort study provides a descriptive analysis of a population that frequently uses an urban emergency medical service (EMS) and identifies factors that contribute to use among all frequent users. For purposes of this study we divided frequent users into the following groups: low- frequent users (4 EMS transports in 2012), medium-frequent users (5 to 6 EMS transports in 2012), high-frequent users (7 to 10 EMS transports in 2012) and super-frequent users (11 or more EMS transports in 2012). Overall, we identified 539 individuals as frequent users. For all groups of EMS frequent users (i.e. low, medium, high and super) one or more hospital admissions, receiving a referral for follow-up care upon discharge, and having no insurance were found to be statistically significant with frequent EMS use (P<0.05). Within the diagnostic categories, 41.61% of super-frequent users had a diagnosis of "primarily substance abuse/misuse" and among low-frequent users a majority, 53.33%, were identified as having a "reoccurring (medical) diagnosis." Lastly, relative risk ratios for the highest group of users, super-frequent users, were 3.34 (95% CI [1.90-5.87]) for obtaining at least one referral for follow-up care, 13.67 (95% CI [5.60-33.34]) for having four or more hospital admissions and 5.95 (95% CI [1.80-19.63]) for having a diagnoses of primarily substance abuse/misuse. Findings from this study demonstrate that among low- and medium-frequent users a majority of patients are using EMS for reoccurring medical conditions. This could potentially be avoided with better care management. In addition, this study adds to the current literature that illustrates a strong correlation between substance abuse/misuse and high/super-frequent EMS use. For the subgroup analysis among individuals 65 years of age and older, we did not find any of the independent variables included in our model to be statistically significant with frequent EMS use.
这项回顾性队列研究对经常使用城市紧急医疗服务(EMS)的人群进行了描述性分析,并确定了所有频繁使用者中促使其使用EMS的因素。在本研究中,我们将频繁使用者分为以下几组:低频繁使用者(2012年有4次EMS转运)、中频繁使用者(2012年有5至6次EMS转运)、高频繁使用者(2012年有7至10次EMS转运)和超级频繁使用者(2012年有11次或更多次EMS转运)。总体而言,我们确定了539名个体为频繁使用者。对于所有EMS频繁使用者组(即低、中、高和超级),发现一次或多次住院、出院后接受随访护理转诊以及没有保险与频繁使用EMS在统计学上具有显著意义(P<0.05)。在诊断类别中,41.61%的超级频繁使用者被诊断为“主要是药物滥用/误用”,而在低频繁使用者中,大多数(53.33%)被确定为患有“复发性(医疗)诊断”。最后,最高使用者组即超级频繁使用者,获得至少一次随访护理转诊的相对风险比为3.34(95%置信区间[1.90 - 5.87]),有四次或更多次住院的相对风险比为13.67(95%置信区间[5.60 - 33.34]),被诊断为主要是药物滥用/误用的相对风险比为5.95(95%置信区间[1.80 - 19.63])。本研究结果表明,在低频繁和中频繁使用者中,大多数患者因复发性医疗状况而使用EMS。通过更好的护理管理,这可能是可以避免的。此外,本研究补充了当前的文献,这些文献表明药物滥用/误用与高/超级频繁使用EMS之间存在很强的相关性。对于65岁及以上个体的亚组分析,我们没有发现模型中包含的任何自变量与频繁使用EMS在统计学上具有显著意义。