• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依鲁替尼治疗印度慢性淋巴细胞白血病的成本效益:证据真的自相矛盾吗?

Cost-Effectiveness of Ibrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treatment in India: Is Evidence Really at Crossroads?

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine and School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Value Health Reg Issues. 2024 Jul;42:100991. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.100991. Epub 2024 May 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2024.100991
PMID:38723366
Abstract

In recent years, newer drugs, such as ibrutinib, have shown promising improvements in the survival of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Despite their effectiveness, concerns about their cost have arisen, prompting the need for an evaluation of their cost-effectiveness. However, recent assessments of ibrutinib's cost-effectiveness for treating CLL in India reveal divergent conclusions. The discord centers on divergent cost-effectiveness thresholds, comparator regimens, cost calculations, and outcome valuation approaches. Such discrepancies affect public health decisions and patient care. The recommendation calls for adherence to methodological guidelines by future studies, fostering consistent findings to empower policy makers and clinicians in leveraging economic evidence for informed decision making in CLL treatment strategies.

摘要

近年来,新型药物,如伊布替尼,在改善慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者的生存率方面显示出了有希望的改善。尽管这些药物具有疗效,但人们对其成本表示担忧,这促使我们需要对其成本效益进行评估。然而,最近对伊布替尼在印度治疗 CLL 的成本效益评估得出了不同的结论。这些分歧的核心在于成本效益阈值、对照方案、成本计算和结果评估方法的不同。这些差异会影响公共卫生决策和患者护理。该建议呼吁未来的研究遵循方法学准则,以产生一致的发现,使决策者和临床医生能够利用经济证据,为 CLL 治疗策略的决策提供信息。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Ibrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treatment in India: Is Evidence Really at Crossroads?依鲁替尼治疗印度慢性淋巴细胞白血病的成本效益:证据真的自相矛盾吗?
Value Health Reg Issues. 2024 Jul;42:100991. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.100991. Epub 2024 May 8.
2
Using Genomic Information to Guide Ibrutinib Treatment Decisions in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.利用基因组信息指导慢性淋巴细胞白血病伊布替尼治疗决策:成本效益分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Aug;35(8):845-858. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0519-z.
3
Impact of ibrutinib and idelalisib on the pharmaceutical cost of treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia at the individual and societal levels.依鲁替尼和艾代拉里斯对慢性淋巴细胞白血病个体及社会层面治疗药物成本的影响。
J Oncol Pract. 2015 May;11(3):252-8. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.002469. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
4
A Markov model-based cost-effectiveness analysis comparing zanubrutinib to ibrutinib for treating relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.基于马尔可夫模型的成本效益分析比较zanubrutinib 与 ibrutinib 治疗复发/难治性慢性淋巴细胞白血病。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Nov;24(9):1089-1096. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2288683. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
5
Cost-effectiveness of first-line vs third-line ibrutinib in patients with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia.一线与三线伊布替尼治疗初治慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者的成本效果分析。
Blood. 2020 Oct 22;136(17):1946-1955. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020004922.
6
Cost-effectiveness of ibrutinib as first-line therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia in older adults without deletion 17p.伊布替尼作为无 17p 缺失的老年慢性淋巴细胞白血病一线治疗的成本效益。
Blood Adv. 2018 Aug 14;2(15):1946-1956. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017015461.
7
A Prospective Economic Analysis of Early Outcome Data From the Alliance A041202/ CCTG CLC.2 Randomized Phase III Trial Of Bendamustine-Rituximab Compared With Ibrutinib-Based Regimens in Untreated Older Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.联盟 A041202/CCTG CLC.2 前瞻性经济分析:随机 III 期试验结果,比较苯达莫司汀-利妥昔单抗与伊布替尼方案治疗未经治疗的老年慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Nov;21(11):766-774. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.06.011. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Ibrutinib Compared With Obinutuzumab With Chlorambucil in Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients With Comorbidities in the United Kingdom.在英国,依鲁替尼与奥滨尤妥珠单抗联合苯丁酸氮芥相比,用于治疗合并症的初治慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者的成本效益。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2018 Feb;18(2):e131-e142. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
9
Time to Next Treatment, Health Care Resource Utilization, and Costs Associated with Ibrutinib Use Among U.S. Veterans with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma: A Real-World Retrospective Analysis.美国慢性淋巴细胞白血病/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤退伍军人接受下一次治疗的时间、医疗保健资源利用情况及与使用依鲁替尼相关的费用:一项真实世界回顾性分析
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Oct;26(10):1266-1275. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.20095. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
10
Complex karyotype is a stronger predictor than del(17p) for an inferior outcome in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients treated with ibrutinib-based regimens.对于接受基于伊布替尼方案治疗的复发或难治性慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者,复杂核型比17号染色体短臂缺失(del(17p))更能预示不良预后。
Cancer. 2015 Oct 15;121(20):3612-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29566. Epub 2015 Jul 20.