Suppr超能文献

在周围动脉疾病患者中应用伤口、缺血和足部感染评分的实际情况。

Real-world application of Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection scores in peripheral arterial disease patients.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine at Denver, Aurora, CO.

Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2024 Oct;80(4):1216-1223. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.071. Epub 2024 May 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system aims to risk stratify patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), predicting both amputation rates and the need for revascularization. However, real-world use of the system and whether it predicts outcomes accurately after open revascularization and peripheral interventions is unclear. Therefore, we sought to determine the adoption of the WIfI classification system within a contemporary statewide collaborative as well as the impact of patient factor, and WIfI risk assessment on short- and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Using data from a large statewide collaborative, we identified patients with CLTI undergoing open surgical revascularization or peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) between 2016 and 2022. The primary exposure was preoperative clinical WIfI stage. Patients were categorized according to the SVS Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System into clinical WIfI stages 1, 2, 3, or 4. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 1-year amputation and mortality rates. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the association of WIfI stage on postrevascularization outcomes.

RESULTS

In the cohort of 17,417 patients, 83.4% (n = 14,529) had WIfI stage documented. PVIs were performed on 57.6% of patients, and 42.4% underwent an open surgical revascularization. Of the patients, 49.5% were classified as stage 1, 19.3% stage 2, 12.8% stage 3, and 18.3% of patients met stage 4 criteria. Stage 3 and 4 patients had higher rates of diabetes, congestive heart failure, and renal failure, and were less likely to be current or former smokers. One-half of stage 3 patients underwent open surgical revascularization, whereas stage 1 patients were most likely to have received a PVI (64%). As WIfI stage increased from 1 to 4, 1-year mortality increased from 12% to 21% (P < .001), 30-day amputation rates increased from 5% to 38% (P < .001), and 1-year amputation rates increased from 15% to 55% (P < .001). Finally, patients who did not have WIfI scores classified had significantly higher 30-day and 1-year mortality rates, as well as higher 30-day and 1-year amputation rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The SVS WIfI clinical stage is significantly associated with 1-year amputation rates in patients with CLTI after lower extremity revascularization. Because nearly 55% of stage 4 patients require a major amputation within 1 year of intervention, this finding study supports use of the WIfI classification system in clinical decision-making for patients with CLTI.

摘要

目的

血管外科学会(SVS)的创面、缺血和足部感染(WIfI)分类系统旨在对慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)患者进行风险分层,预测截肢率和血运重建的需求。然而,该系统在真实世界中的应用情况以及其在开放血管重建术和外周介入治疗后的准确性是否得到准确预测尚不清楚。因此,我们试图确定该分类系统在一个当代全州合作中的应用情况,以及患者因素和 WIfI 风险评估对短期和长期结果的影响。

方法

我们使用来自一个大型全州合作的数据,确定了在 2016 年至 2022 年间接受开放手术血管重建术或外周血管介入治疗(PVI)的 CLTI 患者。主要暴露因素是术前临床 WIfI 分期。根据 SVS 下肢威胁肢体分类系统,患者被分为临床 WIfI 分期 1、2、3 或 4 期。主要结局是 30 天和 1 年的截肢率和死亡率。采用多变量逻辑回归来估计 WIfI 分期对血管重建术后结局的影响。

结果

在 17417 名患者的队列中,83.4%(n=14529)的患者记录了 WIfI 分期。57.6%的患者接受了 PVI,42.4%的患者接受了开放手术血管重建术。患者中,49.5%为 1 期,19.3%为 2 期,12.8%为 3 期,18.3%为 4 期。3 期和 4 期患者糖尿病、充血性心力衰竭和肾衰竭的发生率更高,且目前或曾经吸烟者的比例较低。一半的 3 期患者接受了开放手术血管重建术,而 1 期患者更有可能接受 PVI(64%)。随着 WIfI 分期从 1 期增加到 4 期,1 年死亡率从 12%增加到 21%(P<0.001),30 天截肢率从 5%增加到 38%(P<0.001),1 年截肢率从 15%增加到 55%(P<0.001)。最后,未进行 WIfI 评分分类的患者 30 天和 1 年死亡率以及 30 天和 1 年截肢率显著更高。

结论

在接受下肢血运重建术的 CLTI 患者中,SVS 的 WIfI 临床分期与 1 年截肢率显著相关。由于近 55%的 4 期患者在干预后 1 年内需要进行主要截肢,因此这一研究结果支持在 CLTI 患者的临床决策中使用 WIfI 分类系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验