Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, USA.
The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov;39(14):2671-2678. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08785-9. Epub 2024 May 9.
While enrolled in Hospital at Home (HaH) programs, patients rely on their social network to provide supportive behaviors that are routinely provided by hospital staff in the inpatient setting.
This study investigated how social connectedness is associated with patient outcomes in a HaH program.
The explanatory iterative sequential mixed methods design included an electronic health record review to collect quantitative measures to describe the severity of patient illness and healthcare utilization and then qualitative interviews to explain quantitative findings.
The quantitative phase included 100 patients (18 years or older) admitted to the hospital who were subsequently enrolled in the HaH program. In the qualitative phase, 33 of the 100 patients participated in semi-structured interviews.
Qualitative data was analyzed using the Sort & Sift, Think & Shift method. Integrated analysis included merged data displays of healthcare utilization data and patient descriptions of their care and genogram-type illustrations to enable variable-oriented analysis of structural support. We then examined patient narratives by two variables: life course and care elevation, to understand differences in the trajectories of six subsets of patients as identified by the quantitative data.
Three factors prompted patients to enroll in HaH: low attention from hospital staff during hospital stay; loneliness and isolation during hospital stay; and family encouragement to enroll. After discharge, social support within the home structure facilitated recovery during HaH. Conversely, HaH patients with limited support within the home were more likely to be readmitted.
Structural social connectedness facilitates patient recovery in HaH. Before enrolling patients in HaH, clinicians should take an in-depth social history, including questions about social/familial roles, household responsibilities, and technology acceptance. Clinicians should engage formal and informal caregivers in these conversations early and communicate a clear picture of what caregivers should do to support the patient through recovery.
在居家住院(HaH)项目中,患者依靠他们的社交网络提供支持性的行为,这些行为通常是由住院环境中的医院工作人员提供的。
本研究调查了 HaH 项目中社交联系如何与患者的结局相关。
解释性迭代序贯混合方法设计包括电子健康记录回顾,以收集定量措施来描述患者疾病的严重程度和医疗保健利用情况,然后进行定性访谈以解释定量发现。
定量阶段包括 100 名(18 岁或以上)住院的患者,随后他们被纳入 HaH 项目。在定性阶段,100 名患者中的 33 名参加了半结构化访谈。
使用分类筛选、思考转移方法分析定性数据。整合分析包括医疗保健利用数据和患者描述其护理的合并数据显示,以及系谱类型插图,以实现对结构支持的变量导向分析。然后,我们通过两个变量检查了患者的叙述:生活轨迹和护理提升,以了解根据定量数据确定的六个亚组患者的轨迹差异。
有三个因素促使患者参加 HaH:住院期间医院工作人员的关注度低;住院期间的孤独和孤立;家人鼓励参加。出院后,家庭结构内的社会支持促进了 HaH 期间的康复。相反,家庭结构内支持有限的 HaH 患者更有可能再次入院。
结构社会联系促进了 HaH 患者的康复。在将患者纳入 HaH 之前,临床医生应该进行深入的社会史评估,包括有关社会/家庭角色、家庭责任和技术接受程度的问题。临床医生应该尽早让正式和非正式的照顾者参与这些对话,并清楚地说明照顾者应该做什么来支持患者康复。