• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

协作机器人可以在对遗憾敏感的任务中增强人类认知。

Collaborative robots can augment human cognition in regret-sensitive tasks.

作者信息

Schlafly Millicent, Prabhakar Ahalya, Popovic Katarina, Schlafly Geneva, Kim Christopher, Murphey Todd D

机构信息

Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.

出版信息

PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jan 17;3(2):pgae016. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae016. eCollection 2024 Feb.

DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae016
PMID:38725525
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11079486/
Abstract

Despite theoretical benefits of collaborative robots, disappointing outcomes are well documented by clinical studies, spanning rehabilitation, prostheses, and surgery. Cognitive load theory provides a possible explanation for why humans in the real world are not realizing the benefits of collaborative robots: high cognitive loads may be impeding human performance. Measuring cognitive availability using an electrocardiogram, we ask 25 participants to complete a virtual-reality task alongside an invisible agent that determines optimal performance by iteratively updating the Bellman equation. Three robots assist by providing environmental information relevant to task performance. By enabling the robots to act more autonomously-managing more of their own behavior with fewer instructions from the human-here we show that robots can augment participants' cognitive availability and decision-making. The way in which robots describe and achieve their objective can improve the human's cognitive ability to reason about the task and contribute to human-robot collaboration outcomes. Augmenting human cognition provides a path to improve the efficacy of collaborative robots. By demonstrating how robots can improve human cognition, this work paves the way for improving the cognitive capabilities of first responders, manufacturing workers, surgeons, and other future users of collaborative autonomy systems.

摘要

尽管协作机器人具有理论上的优势,但临床研究(涵盖康复、假肢和手术领域)已充分证明其效果令人失望。认知负荷理论为现实世界中的人类未实现协作机器人优势的原因提供了一种可能的解释:高认知负荷可能正在阻碍人类表现。我们使用心电图测量认知可用性,让25名参与者与一个通过迭代更新贝尔曼方程来确定最佳表现的无形智能体一起完成一项虚拟现实任务。三个机器人通过提供与任务表现相关的环境信息来提供协助。通过使机器人能够更自主地行动——用更少的人类指令来管理更多自身行为——我们在此表明机器人可以增强参与者的认知可用性和决策能力。机器人描述和实现其目标的方式可以提高人类对任务进行推理的认知能力,并有助于人机协作成果。增强人类认知为提高协作机器人的功效提供了一条途径。通过展示机器人如何能够改善人类认知,这项工作为提高急救人员、制造业工人、外科医生以及协作自主系统未来的其他用户的认知能力铺平了道路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/075f/11079486/884bc801753c/pgae016f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/075f/11079486/0cc49b9a4b86/pgae016f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/075f/11079486/30b9491b69bb/pgae016f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/075f/11079486/884bc801753c/pgae016f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/075f/11079486/0cc49b9a4b86/pgae016f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/075f/11079486/30b9491b69bb/pgae016f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/075f/11079486/884bc801753c/pgae016f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Collaborative robots can augment human cognition in regret-sensitive tasks.协作机器人可以在对遗憾敏感的任务中增强人类认知。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jan 17;3(2):pgae016. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae016. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Teleoperator-Robot-Human Interaction in Manufacturing: Perspectives from Industry, Robot Manufacturers, and Researchers.制造中的遥操作机器人-人类交互:来自工业界、机器人制造商和研究人员的观点。
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2024 Jan-Jun;12(1-2):28-40. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2024.2310301. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
3
The effect of human autonomy and robot work pace on perceived workload in human-robot collaborative assembly work.人类自主性和机器人工作节奏对人机协作装配工作中感知工作量的影响。
Front Robot AI. 2023 Nov 3;10:1244656. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1244656. eCollection 2023.
4
Collaborating eye to eye: Effects of workplace design on the perception of dominance of collaboration robots.眼神交流式协作:工作场所设计对协作机器人主导感认知的影响
Front Robot AI. 2022 Sep 27;9:999308. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.999308. eCollection 2022.
5
Learning Semantics of Gestural Instructions for Human-Robot Collaboration.学习用于人机协作的手势指令语义
Front Neurorobot. 2018 Mar 19;12:7. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2018.00007. eCollection 2018.
6
HAbot: a human-centered augmented reality robot programming method with the awareness of cognitive load.哈博特:一种具有认知负荷意识的以人为本的增强现实机器人编程方法。
J Intell Manuf. 2023 Mar 21:1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10845-023-02096-2.
7
A Human-Following Motion Planning and Control Scheme for Collaborative Robots Based on Human Motion Prediction.基于人体运动预测的协作机器人的跟随人体运动规划与控制方案。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Dec 9;21(24):8229. doi: 10.3390/s21248229.
8
Interdisciplinary evaluation of a robot physically collaborating with workers.与工人进行物理协作的机器人的跨学科评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 11;18(10):e0291410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291410. eCollection 2023.
9
Using virtual robot-mediated play activities to assess cognitive skills.使用虚拟机器人介导的游戏活动来评估认知技能。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014 May;9(3):231-41. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2013.782577. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
10
Preferred Interaction Styles for Human-Robot Collaboration Vary Over Tasks With Different Action Types.人机协作的首选交互方式会因具有不同动作类型的任务而有所不同。
Front Neurorobot. 2018 Jul 4;12:36. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2018.00036. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Dry EEG measurement of P3 to evaluate cognitive load during sitting, standing, and walking.干电极脑电图测量 P3 评估坐姿、站立和行走时的认知负荷。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 6;18(7):e0287885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287885. eCollection 2023.
2
Outlearning extortioners: unbending strategies can foster reciprocal fairness and cooperation.战胜敲诈者:坚定的策略能够促进互惠公平与合作。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 May 25;2(6):pgad176. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad176. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Balancing novelty and appropriateness leads to creative associations in children.
在新奇性和适宜性之间取得平衡会促使儿童产生创造性联想。
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Dec 2;1(5):pgac273. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac273. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Cognitive benefits of using non-invasive compared to implantable neural feedback.与植入式神经反馈相比,使用非侵入式神经反馈的认知益处。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 6;12(1):16696. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21057-y.
5
A comparison of reinforcement learning models of human spatial navigation.人类空间导航的强化学习模型比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 17;12(1):13923. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18245-1.
6
Mechanical intelligence for learning embodied sensor-object relationships.用于学习体现式传感器-对象关系的机械智能。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 15;13(1):4108. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31795-2.
7
Robot-assisted gait training: more randomized controlled trials are needed! Or maybe not?机器人辅助步态训练:需要更多的随机对照试验!还是不需要呢?
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Jun 8;19(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01037-z.
8
Relationships between cognitive functioning and power wheelchair performance, confidence and life-space mobility among experienced power wheelchair users: An exploratory study.经验丰富的电动轮椅使用者的认知功能与电动轮椅性能、信心和生活空间移动能力之间的关系:一项探索性研究。
J Rehabil Med. 2021 Sep 9;53(9):jrm00226. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2869.
9
The Evidence Behind Robot-Assisted Abdominopelvic Surgery : A Systematic Review.机器人辅助腹盆腔手术的证据:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Aug;174(8):1110-1117. doi: 10.7326/M20-7006. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
10
The influence of powered prostheses on user perspectives, metabolics, and activity: a randomized crossover trial.动力假肢对使用者观点、新陈代谢和活动的影响:一项随机交叉试验。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Mar 16;18(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00842-2.