Guarrera S, Vanella D, Consoli S, Giudice G, Toscano S, Ramírez-Cuesta J M, Milani M, Ferlito F, Longo D
Agricultural, Food and Environmental Science, Di3A, University of Catania, Catania, 95124, Italy.
Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente (Di3A), Università Degli Studi di Catania, Via S. Sofia, 100, Catania, 95123, Italy.
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 30;10(9):e30543. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30543. eCollection 2024 May 15.
The quantification of soil carbon dioxide (CO) flux represents an indicator of the agro-ecosystems sustainability. However, the monitoring of these fluxes is quite challenging due to their high spatially-temporally variability and dependence on environmental variables and soil management practices.In this study, soil CO fluxes were measured using a low-cost accumulation chamber, that was realized for the surveys, in an orange orchard managed under different soil management (SM, bare mulched soils) and water regime (WR, full irrigation regulated deficit irrigation) strategies. In particular, the soil CO flux measurements were acquired in discontinuous and continuous modes, together with ancillary agrometeorological and soil-related information, and then compared to the agrosystem scale CO fluxes measured by the eddy covariance (EC) technique.Overall significant differences were obtained for the soil CO discontinuous fluxes as function of the WR (0.16 ± 0.01 and 0.14 ± 0.01 mg m s under full irrigation and regulated deficit irrigation, respectively). For the continuous soil CO measurements, the response observed for the SM factor varied from year to year, indicating for the overall reference period 2022-23 higher soil CO flux under the mulched soils (0.24 ± 0.01 mg m s) than under bare soil conditions (0.15 ± 0.00 mg m s). Inter-annual variations were also observed as function of the day-of-year (DOY), the SM and their interactions, resulting in higher soil CO flux under the mulched soils (0.24 ± 0.02 mg m s) than under bare soil (0.15 ± 0.01 mg m s) in certain periods of the years, according to the environmental conditions.
suggest the importance of integrating soil CO flux measurements with ancillary variables that explain the variability of the agrosystem and the need to conduct the measurements using different operational modalities, also providing for night-time monitoring of CO. In addition, the study underlines that the small-scale chamber measurements can be used to estimate soil CO fluxes at orchard scale if fluxes are properly scaled.
土壤二氧化碳(CO₂)通量的量化是农业生态系统可持续性的一个指标。然而,由于这些通量在空间和时间上的高度变异性以及对环境变量和土壤管理实践的依赖性,对其进行监测颇具挑战性。在本研究中,使用一种为调查而制作的低成本累积箱,在采用不同土壤管理(SM,裸地和覆盖土壤)和水分状况(WR,充分灌溉和调亏灌溉)策略管理的柑橘园中测量土壤CO₂通量。具体而言,土壤CO₂通量测量以间断和连续模式进行,并获取辅助农业气象和土壤相关信息,然后与通过涡度协方差(EC)技术测量的农业系统尺度的CO₂通量进行比较。作为WR的函数,土壤CO₂间断通量总体上存在显著差异(充分灌溉和调亏灌溉条件下分别为0.16±0.01和0.14±0.01毫克·米⁻²·秒⁻¹)。对于连续的土壤CO₂测量,观察到的SM因子的响应逐年变化,表明在2022 - 2023年的整个参考期内,覆盖土壤下的土壤CO₂通量(0.24±0.01毫克·米⁻²·秒⁻¹)高于裸地条件下的通量(0.15±0.00毫克·米⁻²·秒⁻¹)。还观察到作为一年中的天数(DOY)、SM及其相互作用的函数的年际变化,根据环境条件,在某些年份的特定时期,覆盖土壤下的土壤CO₂通量(0.24±0.02毫克·米⁻²·秒⁻¹)高于裸地(0.15±0.01毫克·米⁻²·秒⁻¹)。
表明将土壤CO₂通量测量与解释农业系统变异性的辅助变量相结合的重要性,以及使用不同操作模式进行测量的必要性,同时还需进行CO₂的夜间监测。此外,该研究强调,如果通量进行适当的尺度转换,小规模箱式测量可用于估计果园尺度的土壤CO₂通量。