• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在布隆迪种植的选定生物强化普通豆品种的感官特性。

Sensory properties of selected biofortified common bean () varieties grown in Burundi.

作者信息

Muroki Mary W, Waswa Lydiah M, Fungo Robert, Kabwama Andrew, Eric Nduwarugira, Nepomuscene Ntukamazina, Ndabashinze Blaise, Mahungu Symon M

机构信息

Department of Dairy, Food Science and Technology Egerton University Nakuru Kenya.

Department of Human Nutrition Egerton University Nakuru Kenya.

出版信息

Food Sci Nutr. 2024 Feb 13;12(5):3199-3213. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3988. eCollection 2024 May.

DOI:10.1002/fsn3.3988
PMID:38726439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11077167/
Abstract

The dry common bean is an important grain legume used for human consumption worldwide. In Eastern Africa, Burundi has a significantly high per capita consumption of the crop. There has been significant research on the underlying agronomic traits of dry biofortified common beans, such as disease resistance. However, there is limited systematic information describing the sensory properties of these bean varieties, particularly in Burundi. This study evaluated the sensory properties of eight cooked dry biofortified common bean varieties using a panel of fifty-four (fourteen plus forty) persons for descriptive sensory evaluation and consumer acceptability tests. Kinure, a traditional non-biofortified common bean variety, was the control. Based on differences in the attributes of the bean varieties, two-dimensional principal component analysis (PCA) explained 58.94% of the variation. The attributes of astringency, consistency, color, juiciness, beany aroma, stickiness, and bean size contributed mostly to the differentiation of the bean varieties. A 95% PCA prediction ellipse displayed stronger congruity in the descriptive attributes of NUV130, NUV91, RWV1129, RWV1272, and RWR2245. In contrast, a deviation in the descriptive attributes of MAC44, MAC70, and RWR2154 was discerned. Regarding consumer acceptability tests, the varieties RWR2245 and MAC44 garnered significantly higher ( < .05) sensory scores on color, aroma, taste, texture, and overall acceptability. Therefore, the physical traits of cooked biofortified common bean varieties are a major contributor to varietal disparities in consumer acceptance studies. These parameters can greatly impact the adoption of dry biofortified common beans and could be of concern to common bean breeders.

摘要

干普通豆是一种重要的食用豆类,在全球范围内供人类食用。在东非,布隆迪的人均豆类消费量显著较高。关于干生物强化普通豆的潜在农艺性状,如抗病性,已有大量研究。然而,描述这些豆类品种感官特性的系统信息有限,尤其是在布在布隆迪。本研究使用由54人(14名专业人员加40名消费者)组成的小组,对8个煮熟的干生物强化普通豆品种进行了感官特性评估,以进行描述性感官评价和消费者可接受性测试。Kinure,一种传统的非生物强化普通豆品种,用作对照。基于豆类品种属性的差异,二维主成分分析(PCA)解释了58.94%的变异。涩味、质地、颜色、多汁性、豆香、粘性和豆粒大小等属性对豆类品种的区分贡献最大。95%的PCA预测椭圆在NUV130、NUV91、RWV1129、RWV1272和RWR2245的描述属性中显示出更强的一致性。相比之下,MAC44、MAC70和RWR2154的描述属性存在偏差。关于消费者可接受性测试,RWR2245和MAC44品种在颜色、香气、味道、质地和总体可接受性方面获得了显著更高(<0.05)的感官评分。因此,煮熟的生物强化普通豆品种的物理特性是消费者接受度研究中品种差异的主要因素。这些参数可能会极大地影响干生物强化普通豆的推广,普通豆育种者可能会对此表示关注。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fbc/11077167/d6f4c6faa09b/FSN3-12-3199-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fbc/11077167/d6f4c6faa09b/FSN3-12-3199-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fbc/11077167/d6f4c6faa09b/FSN3-12-3199-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Sensory properties of selected biofortified common bean () varieties grown in Burundi.在布隆迪种植的选定生物强化普通豆品种的感官特性。
Food Sci Nutr. 2024 Feb 13;12(5):3199-3213. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3988. eCollection 2024 May.
2
The impact of iron-biofortified bean adoption on bean productivity, consumption, purchases and sales.采用铁生物强化豆对豆类生产力、消费、购买和销售的影响。
World Dev. 2021 Mar;139:105260. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105260.
3
QTL Mapping of Seed Quality Traits Including Cooking Time, Flavor, and Texture in a Yellow Dry Bean ( L.) Population.黄粒干豆(L.)群体中包括烹饪时间、风味和质地在内的种子品质性状的QTL定位
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jun 22;12:670284. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.670284. eCollection 2021.
4
Sensory Attributes of Buckwheat Jelly (Memilmuk) with Mung Bean Starch Added to Improve Texture and Taste.添加绿豆淀粉以改善质地和口感的荞麦凉粉(Memilmuk)的感官特性
Foods. 2021 Nov 18;10(11):2860. doi: 10.3390/foods10112860.
5
Descriptive sensory analysis and consumer preferences of bean sauces.豆酱的描述性感官分析与消费者偏好
Food Sci Nutr. 2020 Jul 16;8(8):4252-4265. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1721. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
Iron Concentrations in Biofortified Beans and Nonbiofortified Marketplace Varieties in East Africa Are Similar.东非强化豆类和非强化市场品种的铁浓度相似。
J Nutr. 2020 Nov 19;150(11):3013-3023. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa193.
7
Optimization of plant density and fertilizer application to improve biofortified common bean ( L.) yield on Nitisols of South-Kivu, Eastern D.R. Congo.优化种植密度和施肥以提高刚果民主共和国东部南基伍省变性土上生物强化普通豆(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)的产量
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 21;9(6):e17293. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17293. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
The acceptance of zinc biofortified rice in Latin America: A consumer sensory study and grain quality characterization.拉丁美洲对锌强化水稻的接受度:消费者感官研究和谷物质量特征描述。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 11;15(11):e0242202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242202. eCollection 2020.
9
Polyphenolic compounds appear to limit the nutritional benefit of biofortified higher iron black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).多酚类化合物似乎会限制生物强化高铁黑豆(菜豆)的营养价值。
Nutr J. 2014 Mar 26;13:28. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-13-28.
10
Single Varietal Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Pastas: Nutritional Profile and Consumer Acceptability.单一品种干豆(菜豆 Phaseolus vulgaris L.)面条:营养概况和消费者接受度。
Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2019 Sep;74(3):342-349. doi: 10.1007/s11130-019-00732-y.

本文引用的文献

1
The flavor of faba bean ingredients and extrudates: Chemical and sensory properties.蚕豆原料和挤压物的风味:化学和感官特性。
Food Res Int. 2022 Dec;162(Pt A):112036. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112036. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
2
Descriptive Analysis of Seven Leguminous Plants in Korea.韩国七种豆科植物的描述性分析。
Prev Nutr Food Sci. 2022 Jun 30;27(2):241-247. doi: 10.3746/pnf.2022.27.2.241.
3
Acceptability of orange corn-common bean as an alternative to corn-soybean complementary porridge in Malawi.赞比亚对用橙色玉米-菜豆替代玉米-大豆混合粥作为补充性食物的可接受性。
J Food Sci. 2022 Jul;87(7):3163-3172. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.16225. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
4
Sensory Characteristics and Nutritional Quality of Food Products Made with a Biofortified and Lectin Free Common Bean ( L.) Flour.采用生物强化和去凝集素普通豆( Phaseolus vulgaris L.)粉制作的食品的感官特性和营养质量。
Nutrients. 2021 Dec 17;13(12):4517. doi: 10.3390/nu13124517.
5
QTL Mapping of Seed Quality Traits Including Cooking Time, Flavor, and Texture in a Yellow Dry Bean ( L.) Population.黄粒干豆(L.)群体中包括烹饪时间、风味和质地在内的种子品质性状的QTL定位
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jun 22;12:670284. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.670284. eCollection 2021.
6
In vitro protein digestibility of finger millet complementary porridge as affected by compositing precooked cowpea with improved malted finger millet.预先煮熟的豇豆与改良发芽黍混合对黍类辅食粥体外蛋白质消化率的影响
J Food Sci Technol. 2021 Feb;58(2):571-580. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04569-1. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
7
An overview of the perception and mitigation of astringency associated with phenolic compounds.酚类化合物涩感的感知与减轻概述。
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2021 Jan;20(1):1036-1074. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12679. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
8
Understanding the Relations Among the Storage, Soaking, and Cooking Behavior of Pulses: A Scientific Basis for Innovations in Sustainable Foods for the Future.了解豆类的储存、浸泡和烹饪特性之间的关系:未来可持续食品创新的科学依据。
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2019 Jul;18(4):1135-1165. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12461. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
9
Descriptive sensory analysis and consumer preferences of bean sauces.豆酱的描述性感官分析与消费者偏好
Food Sci Nutr. 2020 Jul 16;8(8):4252-4265. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1721. eCollection 2020 Aug.
10
Effects of roasting level on physicochemical, sensory, and volatile profiles of soybeans using electronic nose and HS-SPME-GC-MS.利用电子鼻和 HS-SPME-GC-MS 研究烘焙程度对大豆理化性质、感官和挥发性成分的影响。
Food Chem. 2021 Mar 15;340:127880. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127880. Epub 2020 Aug 26.