Tsuji Toshikazu, Nagata Kenichiro, Tanaka Masayuki, Hasebe Shigeru, Yukita Takashi, Uchida Mayako, Suetsugu Kimitaka, Hirota Takeshi, Ieiri Ichiro
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Setsunan University, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Pharmacy, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2024 May 10;10(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40780-024-00341-1.
Pharmacists should be aware of their thought processes in dispensing work, including differences in the dispensing complexities owing to different drug positions in the left, center, and right areas. Dispensing errors associated with "same-name drugs (a pair of drugs with the same name but a different ingredient quantity)" are prevalent and often negatively affect patients. In this study, using five pairs of comparative models, the gaze movements of pharmacists in dispensing work were analyzed using an eye-tracking method to elucidate their thought processes.
We prepared verification slides and displayed them on a prescription monitor and three drug rack monitors. The dispensing information (drug name, drug usage, location display, and total amount) was displayed on a prescription monitor. A total of 180 drugs including five target drugs were displayed on the three drug rack monitors. Total gaze points in the prescription area, those in the drug rack area, total vertical movements between the two areas, and time required to dispense drugs were measured as the four classifications Gaze 1, Gaze 2, Passage, and Time, respectively. First, we defined the two types of location displays as "numeral combination" and "color/symbol combination." Next, we defined two pairs of models A-A (numerals) and B-B (color/symbol) to compare differences between the left and right areas. Moreover, three pairs of models C-C (left), D-D (center), and E-E (right) were established to compare differences between "numeral combination" and "color/symbol combination."
Significant differences in the complexities of dispensing work were observed in Gaze 2, Passage, and Time between the models A-A (A<A), in Gaze 2 between the models B-B (B>B), and in Gaze 2 and Time between the models C-C, D-D, and E-E (C>C, D>D, and E>E, respectively).
Using the current dispensing rules, pharmacists are not good at dispensing drugs located in the right area. An effective measure for reducing the dispensing complexity is to introduce visual information in the prescription content; the utilization of the right brain facilitates reducing the complexity in the right dispensing area.
药剂师应了解其配药工作中的思维过程,包括由于药品在左侧、中间和右侧区域的不同位置而导致的配药复杂性差异。与“同名药物(一对名称相同但成分数量不同的药物)”相关的配药错误很常见,并且常常对患者产生负面影响。在本研究中,使用五对比较模型,采用眼动追踪方法分析药剂师在配药工作中的注视运动,以阐明他们的思维过程。
我们准备了验证幻灯片,并将其显示在处方监视器和三个药架监视器上。配药信息(药品名称、用法、位置显示和总量)显示在处方监视器上。在三个药架监视器上总共显示了包括五种目标药物在内的180种药物。分别将处方区域的总注视点、药架区域的总注视点、两个区域之间的总垂直移动以及配药所需时间作为注视1、注视2、通道和时间这四类进行测量。首先,我们将两种位置显示类型定义为“数字组合”和“颜色/符号组合”。接下来,我们定义了两对模型A - A(数字)和B - B(颜色/符号)以比较左右区域之间的差异。此外,还建立了三对模型C - C(左侧)、D - D(中间)和E - E(右侧)以比较“数字组合”和“颜色/符号组合”之间的差异。
在注视2、通道和时间方面,模型A - A之间(A < A)观察到配药工作复杂性存在显著差异,模型B - B之间在注视2方面(B > B)存在显著差异,模型C - C、D - D和E - E之间在注视2和时间方面(分别为C > C、D > D和E > E)存在显著差异。
按照当前的配药规则,药剂师不擅长调配位于右侧区域的药品。减少配药复杂性的有效措施是在处方内容中引入视觉信息;利用右脑有助于降低右侧配药区域的复杂性。