Ramella Vittorio, Ferrari Andrea, Novati Federico Cesare, Arnež Zoran Marij, Marchi Grace, Rodda Agostino, Bottosso Stefano, Papa Giovanni
Plastic Surgery Department, Ospedale di Cattinara, ASUGI (Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina), 34149 Trieste, Italy.
Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 May 6;13(9):2726. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092726.
: Cervical esophageal reconstruction is vital to improve the quality of life in cancer surgery patients. Microsurgery is crucial in providing vascularized tissue for defect repair, particularly in secondary cases with a higher risk of failure due to larger defects and damage from previous surgery and radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of a series of patients who underwent secondary repair of esophageal defects and provide practical information for the management and treatment of such cases based on the authors' experience and the literature review. : We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of the Plastic Surgery Clinic at the University of Trieste to identify cases of patients who underwent secondary esophageal microsurgical reconstructions following oncological surgery. Patient demographics, the etiology of esophageal defects, previous surgical history, and preoperative assessments were collected from medical records. Surgical techniques utilized for reconstruction, such as pedicled flaps or free tissue transfers, were documented along with intraoperative information. Postoperative outcomes, including complications, graft viability, and functional outcomes, were evaluated during follow-up. : We treated 13 cases of secondary esophageal reconstructions between 2011 and 2022. Most commonly, Antero-Lateral Thigh (ALT) flaps were used in 10 cases, while 2 cases employed a radial forearm flap (RFF), and 1 case employed a chimeric parascapular flap. No flap failures occurred during a median 50-month follow-up. One ALT flap patient experienced postop stricture but maintained swallowing ability. A single tracheoesophageal fistula occurred in an RFF patient with a history of radiotherapy and complete lymph node dissection. : Cervical esophageal reconstruction significantly impacts patients' quality of life by restoring oral feeding and phonation. When local flaps fall short, microsurgical reconstruction with intestinal flaps is valuable but is burdened by limitations. For challenging secondary cases, ALT or RFF flaps emerge as safer options due to their robust pedicles, yielding low complication rates and positive functional outcomes.
颈段食管重建对于提高癌症手术患者的生活质量至关重要。显微外科手术对于为缺损修复提供带血管组织至关重要,尤其是在二次手术病例中,由于缺损较大以及既往手术和放疗造成的损伤,失败风险更高。本研究的目的是描述一系列接受食管缺损二次修复患者的临床特征,并根据作者的经验和文献综述为这类病例的管理和治疗提供实用信息。
我们回顾性分析了的里雅斯特大学整形外科研室的电子病历,以确定肿瘤手术后接受食管显微外科二次重建的患者病例。从病历中收集患者人口统计学资料、食管缺损的病因、既往手术史和术前评估。记录用于重建的手术技术,如带蒂皮瓣或游离组织移植,以及术中信息。在随访期间评估术后结果,包括并发症、移植物存活情况和功能结果。
2011年至2022年期间,我们治疗了13例食管二次重建病例。最常用的是10例采用股前外侧(ALT)皮瓣,2例采用桡侧前臂皮瓣(RFF),1例采用嵌合肩胛旁皮瓣。在中位50个月的随访期间未发生皮瓣失败。1例ALT皮瓣患者术后出现狭窄,但吞咽能力得以维持。1例有放疗和完全淋巴结清扫史的RFF皮瓣患者发生了单例气管食管瘘。
颈段食管重建通过恢复经口进食和发声显著影响患者的生活质量。当局部皮瓣不足时,用肠瓣进行显微外科重建很有价值,但也受到一些限制。对于具有挑战性的二次手术病例,ALT或RFF皮瓣因其蒂部粗壮而成为更安全的选择,并发症发生率低,功能结果良好。