Suppr超能文献

开放与机器人辅助无夹闭部分肾切除术的围手术期、功能和肿瘤学结果比较:倾向评分匹配分析。

Comparison of Perioperative, Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of Open vs. Robot-Assisted Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity Scored Match Analysis.

机构信息

Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, 00128 Rome, Italy.

Urology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60126 Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2024 Apr 28;24(9):2822. doi: 10.3390/s24092822.

Abstract

Off-clamp partial nephrectomy represents one of the latest developments in nephron-sparing surgery, with the goal of preserving renal function and reducing ischemia time. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the functional, oncologic, and perioperative outcomes between off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (off-C RAPN) and off-clamp open partial nephrectomy (off-C OPN) through a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. A 1:1 PSM analysis was used to balance variables potentially affecting postoperative outcomes. To report surgical quality, 1 year trifecta was used. Univariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of trifecta achievement. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) probabilities between groups. Overall, 542 patients were included. After PSM analysis, two homogeneous cohorts of 147 patients were obtained. The off-C RAPN cohort experienced shorter length of stay (LoS) (3.4 days vs. 5.4 days; < 0.001), increased likelihoods of achieving 1 year trifecta (89.8% vs. 80.3%; = 0.03), lower postoperative Clavien-Dindo ≤ 2 complications (1.3% vs. 18.3%, < 0.001), and lower postoperative transfusion rates (3.4% vs. 12.2%, = 0.008). At univariable analysis, the surgical approach (off-C RAPN vs. off-C OPN, OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.09-4.46, = 0.02) was the only predictor of 1 year trifecta achievement. At Kaplan-Meier analysis, no differences were observed between the two groups in terms of OS (log-rank = 0.451), CSS (log-rank = 0.476), DFS (log-rank = 0.678), and MFS (log-rank = 0.226). Comparing RAPN and OPN in a purely off-clamp scenario, the minimally invasive approach proved to be a feasible and safe surgical approach, with a significantly lower LoS and minor rate of postoperative complications and transfusions as a result of improved surgical quality expressed by higher 1 year trifecta achievement.

摘要

去夹部分肾切除术是保肾手术的最新进展之一,其目的是保留肾功能和减少缺血时间。本研究旨在通过倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析评估和比较无夹闭机器人辅助部分肾切除术(off-C RAPN)与无夹闭开放部分肾切除术(off-C OPN)的功能、肿瘤学和围手术期结果。采用 1:1 的 PSM 分析来平衡可能影响术后结果的变量。为了报告手术质量,使用 1 年 trifecta。单变量 Cox 回归分析用于确定 trifecta 达成的预测因素。Kaplan-Meier 法用于比较两组之间的癌症特异性生存(CSS)、总生存(OS)、无病生存(DFS)和无转移生存(MFS)概率。共有 542 例患者入组。PSM 分析后,获得了两组同质的 147 例患者。off-C RAPN 组的住院时间(LoS)更短(3.4 天比 5.4 天; <0.001),1 年 trifecta 达成的可能性更高(89.8%比 80.3%; =0.03),术后 Clavien-Dindo ≤ 2 级并发症的发生率更低(1.3%比 18.3%, <0.001),术后输血率更低(3.4%比 12.2%, =0.008)。单变量分析中,手术方式(off-C RAPN 与 off-C OPN,OR 2.22,95%CI 1.09-4.46, =0.02)是 1 年 trifecta 达成的唯一预测因素。Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,两组在 OS(对数秩 =0.451)、CSS(对数秩 =0.476)、DFS(对数秩 =0.678)和 MFS(对数秩 =0.226)方面无差异。在纯粹无夹闭的情况下比较 RAPN 和 OPN,微创方法被证明是一种可行且安全的手术方法,由于更高的 1 年 trifecta 达成率导致手术质量提高,从而显著降低了 LoS,术后并发症和输血的发生率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/865e/11086121/aec46f26f2e6/sensors-24-02822-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验