Suppr超能文献

人工耳蜗使用者视听言语加工中视听注意的变化:一项纵向 ERP 研究。

Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.

机构信息

Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology and Pediatric Audiology, Cochlear Implant Centre, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Germany.

Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology and Pediatric Audiology, Cochlear Implant Centre, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Germany.

出版信息

Hear Res. 2024 Jun;447:109023. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109023. Epub 2024 Apr 27.

Abstract

Limited auditory input, whether caused by hearing loss or by electrical stimulation through a cochlear implant (CI), can be compensated by the remaining senses. Specifically for CI users, previous studies reported not only improved visual skills, but also altered cortical processing of unisensory visual and auditory stimuli. However, in multisensory scenarios, it is still unclear how auditory deprivation (before implantation) and electrical hearing experience (after implantation) affect cortical audiovisual speech processing. Here, we present a prospective longitudinal electroencephalography (EEG) study which systematically examined the deprivation- and CI-induced alterations of cortical processing of audiovisual words by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) in postlingually deafened CI users before and after implantation (five weeks and six months of CI use). A group of matched normal-hearing (NH) listeners served as controls. The participants performed a word-identification task with congruent and incongruent audiovisual words, focusing their attention on either the visual (lip movement) or the auditory speech signal. This allowed us to study the (top-down) attention effect on the (bottom-up) sensory cortical processing of audiovisual speech. When compared to the NH listeners, the CI candidates (before implantation) and the CI users (after implantation) exhibited enhanced lipreading abilities and an altered cortical response at the N1 latency range (90-150 ms) that was characterized by a decreased theta oscillation power (4-8 Hz) and a smaller amplitude in the auditory cortex. After implantation, however, the auditory-cortex response gradually increased and developed a stronger intra-modal connectivity. Nevertheless, task efficiency and activation in the visual cortex was significantly modulated in both groups by focusing attention on the visual as compared to the auditory speech signal, with the NH listeners additionally showing an attention-dependent decrease in beta oscillation power (13-30 Hz). In sum, these results suggest remarkable deprivation effects on audiovisual speech processing in the auditory cortex, which partially reverse after implantation. Although even experienced CI users still show distinct audiovisual speech processing compared to NH listeners, pronounced effects of (top-down) direction of attention on (bottom-up) audiovisual processing can be observed in both groups. However, NH listeners but not CI users appear to show enhanced allocation of cognitive resources in visually as compared to auditory attended audiovisual speech conditions, which supports our behavioural observations of poorer lipreading abilities and reduced visual influence on audition in NH listeners as compared to CI users.

摘要

有限的听觉输入,无论是由听力损失还是通过耳蜗植入物(CI)的电刺激引起的,都可以通过其他感觉来补偿。具体来说,对于 CI 用户,先前的研究不仅报告了视觉技能的提高,还报告了对单感官视觉和听觉刺激的皮质处理的改变。然而,在多感官情况下,仍不清楚听觉剥夺(植入前)和电听觉体验(植入后)如何影响皮质视听语音处理。在这里,我们提出了一项前瞻性纵向脑电图(EEG)研究,通过比较植入前后(植入后五周和六个月)的事件相关电位(ERP),系统地检查了听觉剥夺和 CI 诱导的皮质对视听单词处理的改变。一组匹配的正常听力(NH)听众作为对照。参与者执行了一个视听单词识别任务,其中包括一致和不一致的视听单词,他们将注意力集中在视觉(嘴唇运动)或听觉语音信号上。这使我们能够研究(自上而下)注意力对视听语音的(自下而上)感觉皮质处理的影响。与 NH 听众相比,CI 候选者(植入前)和 CI 用户(植入后)表现出增强的唇读能力和 N1 潜伏期范围内的皮质反应改变,其特征为 theta 振荡功率(4-8 Hz)降低和听觉皮层的振幅减小。然而,植入后,听觉皮层的反应逐渐增加并发展出更强的模态内连接。尽管如此,在两组中,通过将注意力集中在视觉语音信号上,任务效率和视觉皮层的激活都得到了显著调节,NH 听众还表现出与注意力相关的 beta 振荡功率(13-30 Hz)降低。总的来说,这些结果表明,听觉皮层对视听语音处理存在显著的剥夺效应,植入后部分逆转。尽管即使是经验丰富的 CI 用户与 NH 听众相比仍然存在明显的视听语音处理差异,但在两组中都可以观察到(自上而下)注意力方向对(自下而上)视听处理的显著影响。然而,与 CI 用户相比,NH 听众而非 CI 用户似乎在视觉上比听觉上更能增强对视听语音条件的认知资源分配,这支持了我们在 NH 听众中观察到的较差的唇读能力和视觉对听觉的影响降低的行为观察结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验