Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Kashihara, Japan.
Department of Prostate Brachytherapy, Nara Medical University, Nara, Kashihara, Japan.
Prostate. 2024 Sep;84(12):1104-1111. doi: 10.1002/pros.24744. Epub 2024 May 12.
It is unclear whether a hydrogel spacer can improve quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) alone or in combination with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
We enrolled patients with prostate cancer who underwent LDR-BT alone with (n = 186) or without (n = 348) a hydrogel spacer, or underwent LDR-BT in combination with IMRT with (n = 70) or without (n = 217) a hydrogel spacer. QOL was evaluated using Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaires at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after implantation. The groups were compared using propensity score matching analysis.
Among patients who underwent LDR-BT alone, there were no differences regarding changes in urinary, bowel, sexual, or hormonal domain scores between the spacer and no-spacer groups; however, the dose at the bowel was significantly lower in the spacer group than in the no-spacer group. Among patients who underwent LDR-BT in combination with IMRT, there were no differences regarding changes in urinary, sexual, or hormonal domain scores between the spacer and no-spacer groups. However, the changes in the bowel domain score were significantly lower in the spacer group than in the no-spacer group (p < 0.001).
A hydrogel spacer may not improve impaired urinary, bowel, or sexual QOL in patients undergoing LDR-BT alone. However, in patients undergoing LDR-BT in combination with IMRT, a hydrogel spacer can improve impaired bowel QOL but not sexual or urinary QOL.
目前尚不清楚水凝胶间隔器能否提高接受低剂量率近距离放射治疗(LDR-BT)单独或联合调强放射治疗(IMRT)的患者的生活质量(QOL)。
我们招募了接受 LDR-BT 单独治疗的前列腺癌患者(n=186)或不接受(n=348)水凝胶间隔器治疗的患者,或接受 LDR-BT 联合 IMRT 治疗的患者(n=70)或不接受(n=217)水凝胶间隔器治疗的患者。在植入后 1、3、6、12 和 24 个月使用前列腺癌指数综合量表(EPIC)问卷评估 QOL。使用倾向评分匹配分析比较各组之间的差异。
在接受 LDR-BT 单独治疗的患者中,间隔器组和非间隔器组在尿、肠、性或激素域评分的变化方面没有差异;然而,间隔器组的肠道剂量明显低于非间隔器组。在接受 LDR-BT 联合 IMRT 治疗的患者中,间隔器组和非间隔器组在尿、性或激素域评分的变化方面没有差异。然而,间隔器组的肠道域评分的变化明显低于非间隔器组(p<0.001)。
水凝胶间隔器可能不会改善接受单独 LDR-BT 治疗的患者的尿、肠或性 QOL 受损。然而,在接受 LDR-BT 联合 IMRT 治疗的患者中,水凝胶间隔器可以改善受损的肠 QOL,但不能改善性或尿 QOL。