Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2024 Aug 15;359:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.042. Epub 2024 May 10.
No studies systematically examined sex differences in neural mechanisms underlying depression and mania/hypomania risk.
80 females and 35 males, n = 115(age21.6±1.90) were scanned using 3TfMRI during an implicit emotional-faces task. We examined neural activation to all emotional faces versus baseline, using an anatomical region-of-interest mask comprising regions supporting emotion and salience processing. Sex was a covariate. Extracted parameter estimates(FWE < 0.05,k > 15), age, IQ and their sex interactions were independent variables(IV) in two penalized regression models: dependent variable either MOODS-SR-lifetime, depressive or manic domain score as measures of mania and depression risk. Subsequent Poisson regression models included the non-zero variables identified in the penalized regression models. We tested each model in 2 independent samples. Test sample-I,n = 108(21.6 ± 2.09 years,males/females = 33/75); Test sample-II,n = 93(23.7 ± 2.9 years,males/females = 31/62).
Poisson regression models yielded significant relationships with depression and mania risk: Positive correlations were found between right fusiform activity and depression(beta = 0.610) and mania(beta = 0.690) risk. There was a significant interaction between sex and right fusiform activity(beta = -0.609) related to depression risk, where females had a positive relationship than; and a significant interaction(beta = 0.743) between sex and left precuneus activity related to mania risk, with a more negative relationship in females than males. All findings were replicated in the test samples(qs < 0.05,FDR).
No longitudinal follow-up.
Greater visual attention to emotional faces might underlie greater depression and mania risk, and confer greater vulnerability to depression in females, because of heightened visual attention to emotional faces. Females have a more negative relationship between mania risk and left precuneus activity, suggesting heightened empathy might be associated with reduced mania/hypomania risk in females more than males.
没有研究系统地检查抑郁和躁狂/轻躁狂风险的神经机制中的性别差异。
80 名女性和 35 名男性,n=115(年龄 21.6±1.90)在 3T fMRI 中接受了隐性情绪面孔任务的扫描。我们使用包含支持情绪和突显处理的区域的解剖学区域兴趣掩模,检查了所有情绪面孔相对于基线的神经激活。性别是协变量。提取的参数估计(FWE<0.05,k>15)、年龄、智商及其性别相互作用是两个惩罚回归模型的自变量(IV):因变量要么是 MOODS-SR-终生、抑郁或躁狂域评分,作为躁狂和抑郁风险的测量指标。随后的泊松回归模型包括惩罚回归模型中确定的非零变量。我们在两个独立的样本中测试了每个模型。测试样本 I,n=108(21.6±2.09 岁,男性/女性=33/75);测试样本 II,n=93(23.7±2.9 岁,男性/女性=31/62)。
泊松回归模型与抑郁和躁狂风险呈显著相关:右侧梭状回活动与抑郁(β=0.610)和躁狂(β=0.690)风险呈正相关。性别与右侧梭状回活动之间存在显著的相互作用(β=-0.609),与抑郁风险有关,女性的关系更为积极;性别与左楔前叶活动之间存在显著的相互作用(β=0.743),与躁狂风险有关,女性的关系更为消极。所有发现都在测试样本中得到了复制(qs<0.05,FDR)。
无纵向随访。
对情绪面孔的更大视觉注意力可能是抑郁和躁狂风险更大的基础,并且由于对情绪面孔的视觉注意力增加,女性更容易受到抑郁的影响。女性的躁狂风险与左楔前叶活动之间的关系更为消极,这表明女性的同理心可能与男性相比,与降低躁狂/轻躁狂风险更为相关。