Suppr超能文献

淋巴结清扫术对非小细胞肺癌患者癌症特异性生存的影响:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析

Impact of lymph node dissection on cancer-specific survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a SEER database analysis.

作者信息

Zhao Ziran, Gao Yibo, Tan Fengwei, Xue Qi, Gao Shugeng, He Jie

机构信息

Thoracic Surgery Department, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 Apr 29;13(4):821-838. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-24-91. Epub 2024 Apr 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and lymph node dissection (LND) is a significant surgical procedure employed in its management. Although some studies suggest benefits of LND, the extent of its impact on survival, the optimal range of lymph nodes to be examined, and the specific patient groups that benefit most remain areas of active debate and investigation.

METHODS

A population-based analysis was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients diagnosed with NSCLC between 2004 and 2017, undergoing primary tumor resection, were included. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate analyses assessed the effect of LND on survival, and a restricted cubic spline method determined the optimal range for lymph node examination.

RESULTS

This study of 37,323 NSCLC patients delved into the impact of LND on lung cancer-specific survival. Key findings revealed a median survival of 19.58 months, with 85% mortality. Baseline characteristics included a majority of White patients (81%), distant stage diagnoses (63%), and 64% with Grade IV tumors. LND emerged as a crucial predictor, influencing survival across age, gender, race, and tumor characteristics. Univariate analysis highlighted its significance, with higher T, N, and M categories, advanced stage, and poorer grade associating with elevated hazard ratios. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards (PH) analysis reinforced LND's impact, showcasing lower hazard ratios post-removal. Hazard ratios for biopsy/aspiration and removal of regional lymph nodes were 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81-0.89; P<0.001] and 0.43 (95% CI: 0.39-0.46; P<0.001), underscoring the protective effect. Visualizations and a U-shaped curve analysis identified an optimal range (24-32 nodes) for examination, emphasizing the nuanced benefits across NSCLC stages.

CONCLUSIONS

The study findings suggest that LND plays a critical role in improving cancer-specific survival in NSCLC patients, particularly when tailored to the early stages of the disease. The optimal range of lymph nodes examined, between 24 and 32, offers crucial insights for personalized NSCLC treatment strategies and may enhance overall survival. These results underscore the need for refined surgical guidelines that incorporate the extent of LND, supporting the utility of a more personalized approach in NSCLC management.

摘要

背景

非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因,淋巴结清扫术(LND)是其治疗中采用的一项重要外科手术。尽管一些研究表明LND有益处,但其对生存的影响程度、检查淋巴结的最佳范围以及最能从中获益的特定患者群体仍是积极辩论和研究的领域。

方法

使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库进行基于人群的分析。纳入2004年至2017年间诊断为NSCLC并接受原发性肿瘤切除的患者。描述性、单变量和多变量分析评估了LND对生存的影响,采用受限立方样条法确定淋巴结检查的最佳范围。

结果

这项对37323例NSCLC患者的研究深入探讨了LND对肺癌特异性生存的影响。主要发现显示中位生存期为19.58个月,死亡率为85%。基线特征包括大多数为白人患者(81%)、远处分期诊断(63%)以及64%为IV级肿瘤。LND是一个关键预测因素,影响着不同年龄、性别、种族和肿瘤特征患者的生存。单变量分析突出了其重要性,较高的T、N和M类别、晚期以及较差的分级与较高的风险比相关。多变量Cox比例风险(PH)分析强化了LND的影响,显示切除后风险比降低。活检/穿刺和区域淋巴结切除的风险比分别为0.85 [95%置信区间(CI):0.81 - 0.89;P < 0.001]和0.43(95% CI:0.39 - 0.46;P < 0.001),突出了保护作用。可视化和U形曲线分析确定了检查的最佳范围(24 - 32个淋巴结),强调了NSCLC各阶段的细微益处。

结论

研究结果表明,LND在提高NSCLC患者的癌症特异性生存方面起着关键作用,尤其是在针对疾病早期进行调整时。检查的淋巴结最佳范围在24至32个之间,为个性化NSCLC治疗策略提供了关键见解,并可能提高总体生存率。这些结果强调了制定纳入LND范围的精细手术指南的必要性,支持在NSCLC管理中采用更个性化方法的实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56fe/11082698/269c8a952fae/tlcr-13-04-821-f2.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验