Cartwright Allison, Dooley James S G, McGonigle Chris D, Arnscheidt Joerg
Ulster University, Cromore Road, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, BT52 1SA, UK.
Access Microbiol. 2024 Apr 19;6(4). doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000691.v4. eCollection 2024.
Faecal pollution of water by bacteria has a negative effect on water quality and can pose a potential health hazard. Conventional surveillance of microbial water quality relies on the analysis of low-frequency spot samples and is thus likely to miss episodic or periodic pollution. This study aimed to investigate the potential of filter-feeding sponges for time-integrated biomonitoring of microbial water quality. Laboratory trials tested the effects of different ratios of bacterial abundance and the sequence of exposure on bacterial retention by the freshwater sponge (Linnaeus, 1759) to establish its potential to indicate bacterial exposure. Gemmule grown sponges were simultaneously exposed to and but at different ratios (Trial 1) or individually exposed to each bacterial species but in different sequential order (Trial 2). The and retained in each sponge was quantified by culture on selective agars. Data analysis was conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test and/or the Mann-Whitney U test to compare between the numbers of bacteria retained in each treatment. Additionally, the Wilcoxon matched-paired signed-rank test was used for comparison of the different bacterial abundances retained within each individual sponge. Sponges from all trials retained and in small numbers relative to the exposure (<0.05 % Trial 1 and <0.07 % Trial 2) but exhibited higher retention of . Higher abundance of either bacterial species resulted in significantly lower (<0.005) retention of the same species within sponges (Trial 1). An initial exposure to resulted in significantly higher (=0.040) retention of both bacterial species than when sponges were exposed to first (Trial 2).Bacterial retention by sponges was neither quantitatively representative of bacterial abundance in the ambient water nor the sequence of exposure. This implies either selective filtration or an attempt by sponges to prevent infection. However, freshwater sponges may still be useful in biomonitoring as qualitative time-integrated samplers of faecal indicator bacteria as they detect different bacteria present in the water even if their quantities cannot be estimated.
细菌对水的粪便污染会对水质产生负面影响,并可能构成潜在的健康危害。传统的微生物水质监测依赖于低频现场样本分析,因此很可能错过偶发性或周期性污染。本研究旨在调查滤食性海绵对微生物水质进行时间积分生物监测的潜力。实验室试验测试了不同细菌丰度比例和暴露顺序对淡水海绵(林奈,1759年)细菌截留的影响,以确定其指示细菌暴露的潜力。将芽球生长的海绵同时暴露于 和 ,但比例不同(试验1),或分别暴露于每种细菌,但顺序不同(试验2)。通过在选择性琼脂上培养来量化每种海绵中截留的 和 。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验和/或Mann-Whitney U检验进行数据分析,以比较每种处理中截留的细菌数量。此外,使用Wilcoxon配对符号秩检验来比较每个个体海绵中截留的不同细菌丰度。所有试验中的海绵相对于暴露量截留的 和 数量较少(试验1中<0.05%,试验2中<0.07%),但对 的截留率较高。两种细菌中任一种丰度较高都会导致海绵中同一种细菌的截留率显著降低(<0.005)(试验1)。与海绵首先暴露于 相比,初始暴露于 会导致两种细菌的截留率显著更高(=0.040)(试验2)。海绵对细菌的截留既不能定量代表环境水中的细菌丰度,也不能代表暴露顺序。这意味着要么是选择性过滤,要么是海绵试图预防感染。然而,淡水海绵作为粪便指示细菌的定性时间积分采样器,在生物监测中可能仍然有用,因为它们能检测水中存在的不同细菌,即使无法估计其数量。