• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机动车事故到达的时间延迟:创伤团队启动的批判性分析

Time Delay in Motor Vehicle Accident Arrival: A Critical Analysis of Trauma Team Activation.

作者信息

Taylor Zachary, McCague Andrew

机构信息

Medicine, College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific - Northwest, Western University of Health Sciences, Lebanon, USA.

General Surgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Apr 11;16(4):e58070. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58070. eCollection 2024 Apr.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.58070
PMID:38738038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11088479/
Abstract

Introduction This research aims to investigate the role of time since trauma (TST) in refining trauma team activation (TTA) criteria within a level I trauma center. We analyze the association between TST and post-emergency department (ED) disposition, proposing new insights for the enhancement of TTA criteria. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on a dataset comprising 3,693 patients presenting to a level I trauma center following motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) from 2016 to 2021. Data from a trauma registry, encompassing time of injury, time of ED arrival, TTA status, and post-ED disposition, were utilized. TST was calculated as the difference between the time of injury and the time of ED arrival. Patients that received TTA, full or partial, were categorized based on TST (less than one hour, one to two hours, and two or more hours). Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests, were performed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) (version 3.8, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Results Of the 1,261 patients meeting the criteria, 98.3% received TTA, with decreasing TTA rates observed with increasing TST (p = 0.0076). A significant association was found between TST and post-ED disposition for patients who received TTA (p = 0.0007). Compared to the other TST groups, a higher proportion of patients with a TST of two or more hours were admitted, sent to the intensive care unit (ICU), and sent to the operating room (OR).  Conclusion The study indicates a statistically significant relationship between TST and TTA rates, challenging our assumptions about the decreased need for TTA over time. While a longer TST was associated with a lower percentage of TTA, patients with a TST of two or more hours demonstrated increased rates of admission, ICU utilization, and surgical interventions. This suggests that TTA criteria may benefit from refinement to include patients with longer TST. Acknowledging study limitations, such as a small sample size and retrospective design, this research contributes valuable insights into potential considerations for optimizing trauma care protocols.

摘要

引言 本研究旨在探讨创伤后时间(TST)在一级创伤中心完善创伤团队启动(TTA)标准中的作用。我们分析了TST与急诊科(ED)出院处置之间的关联,为改进TTA标准提供新的见解。方法 对2016年至2021年期间因机动车事故(MVA)到一级创伤中心就诊的3693例患者的数据集进行回顾性分析。利用创伤登记处的数据,包括受伤时间、ED到达时间、TTA状态和ED出院处置情况。TST计算为受伤时间与ED到达时间之间的差值。接受全部或部分TTA的患者根据TST进行分类(少于1小时、1至2小时和2小时或更长时间)。使用统计分析系统(SAS)(版本3.8,SAS Institute Inc.,北卡罗来纳州卡里)进行统计分析,包括卡方检验。结果 在符合标准的1261例患者中,98.3%接受了TTA,随着TST增加,TTA率下降(p = 0.0076)。在接受TTA的患者中,发现TST与ED出院处置之间存在显著关联(p = 0.0007)。与其他TST组相比,TST为2小时或更长时间的患者中,更高比例的患者被收治、送入重症监护病房(ICU)和送入手术室(OR)。结论 该研究表明TST与TTA率之间存在统计学上的显著关系,挑战了我们关于随着时间推移TTA需求减少的假设。虽然较长的TST与较低的TTA百分比相关,但TST为2小时或更长时间的患者入院率、ICU使用率和手术干预率增加。这表明TTA标准可能受益于改进,以纳入TST较长的患者。认识到研究的局限性,如样本量小和回顾性设计,本研究为优化创伤护理方案的潜在考虑因素提供了有价值的见解。

相似文献

1
Time Delay in Motor Vehicle Accident Arrival: A Critical Analysis of Trauma Team Activation.机动车事故到达的时间延迟:创伤团队启动的批判性分析
Cureus. 2024 Apr 11;16(4):e58070. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58070. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Paramedic judgment of the need for trauma team activation for pediatric patients.护理人员对儿科患者启动创伤团队的必要性的判断。
Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Oct;5(10):1002-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02780.x.
3
Old Age With a Traumatic Mechanism of Injury Should Be a Trauma Team Activation Criterion.伴有创伤性损伤机制的老年患者应作为创伤团队启动标准。
J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;57(2):151-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 May 9.
4
Using a multidisciplinary and evidence-based approach to decrease undertriage and overtriage of pediatric trauma patients.采用多学科且基于证据的方法,以减少儿科创伤患者的分诊不足和过度分诊情况。
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Sep;51(9):1518-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
5
Let the surgeon sleep: trauma team activation for severe hypotension.让外科医生去休息:针对严重低血压的创伤团队启动。
J Trauma. 2008 Dec;65(6):1245-50; discussion 1250-2. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31818c262f.
6
Precision of field triage in patients brought to a trauma centre after introducing trauma team activation guidelines.引入创伤团队激活指南后,对送往创伤中心的患者进行现场分诊的精确性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009 Jan 9;17:1. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-1.
7
Association of In-Hospital Mortality and Trauma Team Activation: A 10-Year Study.院内死亡率与创伤团队启动的关联:一项为期10年的研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;12(10):2334. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102334.
8
The advantages of early trauma team activation in the management of major trauma patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy.早期创伤团队启动在接受剖腹探查术的严重创伤患者管理中的优势。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014 Dec;87(6):319-24. doi: 10.4174/astr.2014.87.6.319. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
9
Failure to initiate trauma team activation for patients who meet the criteria in a level 1 paediatric trauma centre: which patients are missing out?未能为符合一级儿科创伤中心标准的患者启动创伤小组:哪些患者被遗漏了?
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Oct;92(10):2628-2634. doi: 10.1111/ans.17906. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
10
Evaluation of Prehospital Undertriage in Relation to Trauma Team Activation-Results from a Prospective Study in 12 Level one German Trauma Centers.德国12家一级创伤中心前瞻性研究中与创伤团队启动相关的院前分诊评估结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 16;13(6):1714. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061714.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Trauma Team Activation Fees by US Region and Hospital Ownership.美国地区和医院所有权对创伤小组激活费的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2252520. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.52520.
2
Association of In-Hospital Mortality and Trauma Team Activation: A 10-Year Study.院内死亡率与创伤团队启动的关联:一项为期10年的研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Sep 27;12(10):2334. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102334.
3
Variation in Trauma Team Response Fees in United States Trauma Centers: An Additional Undisclosed Variable Cost in Trauma Care.美国创伤中心创伤团队响应费用的差异:创伤护理中一项额外的未公开可变成本。
Cureus. 2022 Jan 31;14(1):e21776. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21776. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Changing from a two-tiered to a one-tiered trauma team activation protocol: a before-after observational cohort study investigating the clinical impact of undertriage.从双层创伤小组激活模式转变为单层创伤小组激活模式:一项观察性队列研究,调查分诊不足对临床的影响
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Oct;48(5):3803-3811. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01696-y. Epub 2021 May 22.
5
Survey on worldwide trauma team activation requirement.世界范围创伤小组激活要求调查。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Oct;47(5):1569-1580. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01334-z. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
6
A quality-improvement approach to effective trauma team activation.一种提高创伤团队激活效果的质量改进方法。
Can J Surg. 2019 Oct 1;62(5):305-314. doi: 10.1503/cjs.000218.
7
How much green does it take to be orange? Determining the cost associated with trauma center readiness.需要多少绿色才能变成橙色?确定与创伤中心准备就绪相关的成本。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 May;86(5):765-773. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002213.
8
Trauma Team Activation: Not Just for Trauma Patients.创伤团队激活:不仅适用于创伤患者。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2017 Jul-Sep;10(3):151-153. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_147_16.
9
Efficacy of a two-tiered trauma team activation protocol in a Norwegian trauma centre.挪威创伤中心双层创伤小组激活方案的疗效。
Br J Surg. 2012 Feb;99(2):199-208. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7794. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
10
The rapid impact on mortality rates of a dedicated care team including trauma and emergency physicians at an academic medical center.在一所学术医疗中心,由创伤和急诊医生组成的专业护理团队对死亡率的快速影响。
J Emerg Med. 2011 May;40(5):586-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.08.056. Epub 2009 Dec 21.