• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Access for Coronary Interventions.经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉介入治疗后的桡动脉闭塞
Cureus. 2024 Apr 11;16(4):e58036. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58036. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Incidence and Prognostic Factors of Radial Artery Occlusion in Transradial Coronary Catheterization.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉闭塞的发生率及预后因素
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 1;13(11):3276. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113276.
3
A Transradial Approach of Cardiac Catheterization for Patients on Dialysis.透析患者心脏导管插入术的经桡动脉途径
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Jun;30(6):212-217. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
4
Distal versus conventional radial access for coronary angiography and intervention: Design and rationale of DISCO RADIAL study.经桡动脉远端入路与传统桡动脉入路行冠状动脉造影及介入治疗的比较:DISCO RADIAL 研究的设计和原理。
Am Heart J. 2022 Feb;244:19-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.10.180. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
5
Distal Versus Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: The DISCO RADIAL Trial.远端桡动脉入路与传统桡动脉入路在冠状动脉造影和介入治疗中的比较:DISCO RADIAL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun 27;15(12):1191-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.04.032. Epub 2022 May 17.
6
Feasibility of Transradial Access for Coronary Interventions Via Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Radial Artery in Cases of Functional Radial Occlusion.在功能性桡动脉闭塞病例中,经桡动脉经皮血管成形术进行冠状动脉介入治疗的桡动脉入路可行性。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Oct;30(10):355-359. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
7
Effect of Duration of Hemostatic Compression on Radial Artery Occlusion after Transradial Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.止血按压时间对经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入治疗后桡动脉闭塞的影响。
Mymensingh Med J. 2023 Apr;32(2):386-392.
8
Incidence and predictors of radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization.经桡动脉冠状动脉导管插入术后桡动脉闭塞的发生率及预测因素。
Egypt Heart J. 2019 Sep 5;71(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s43044-019-0008-0.
9
Impact of Access Site on Periprocedural Bleeding and Cerebral and Coronary Events in High-Bleeding-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Findings from the RIVA-PCI Trial.穿刺部位对高出血风险经皮冠状动脉介入治疗围手术期出血及脑卒中和冠状动脉事件的影响:RIVA-PCI试验结果
Cardiol Ther. 2024 Mar;13(1):89-101. doi: 10.1007/s40119-023-00343-4. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
10
Distal Transradial Access: a Safe and Feasible Approach for Coronary Catheterization in Cases of Total Radial Artery Occlusion.经桡动脉远端入路:在完全性桡动脉闭塞病例中进行冠状动脉造影的安全可行方法。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2022 Oct;15(5):1203-1211. doi: 10.1007/s12265-022-10238-9. Epub 2022 Mar 25.

本文引用的文献

1
The frequency of radial artery occlusion following cardiac catheterization with the use of transradial pneumatic compression band.使用经桡动脉充气加压带进行心导管插入术后桡动脉闭塞的发生率。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Oct 20;13(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05323-8.
2
Contemporary Arterial Access in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.当代心脏导管实验室的动脉通路技术
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 27;10(22):2233-2241. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.058.
3
Radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization.经桡动脉冠状动脉导管插入术后桡动脉闭塞
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Jun;7(3):305-316. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.03.14.
4
Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉与股动脉入路的随机多中心试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2465-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
5
Arterial access site utilization in cardiogenic shock in the United Kingdom: is radial access feasible?英国心源性休克患者的动脉入路使用情况:桡动脉入路是否可行?
Am Heart J. 2014 Jun;167(6):900-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
6
Radial artery occlusion after percutaneous coronary interventions - an underestimated issue.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后桡动脉闭塞——一个被低估的问题。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2013;9(4):353-61. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2013.38865. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
7
Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012).经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉入路的采用和与股动脉入路的结果比较:国家心血管数据登记处(2007-2012 年)的最新报告。
Circulation. 2013 Jun 11;127(23):2295-306. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000536.
8
The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011).经桡动脉行 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的流行率和结局:来自国家心血管数据注册中心(2007 年至 2011 年)的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 29;61(4):420-426. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.032. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
9
Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study.桡动脉入路与股动脉入路随机对照在 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的研究:RIFLE-STEACS(ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的桡动脉入路与股动脉入路随机对照研究)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):2481-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.017. Epub 2012 Aug 1.
10
Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction Systematic overview and meta-analysis.急性心肌梗死经桡动脉与经股动脉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:系统综述与荟萃分析
Am Heart J. 2009 Nov;158(5):814-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.08.022.

经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉介入治疗后的桡动脉闭塞

Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Access for Coronary Interventions.

作者信息

Ahmad Farooq, Ullah Ikram, Khan Sher W

机构信息

Cardiology, Khyber Medical College/Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, PAK.

Interventional Cardiology, Fauji Foundation Hospital, Peshawar, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Apr 11;16(4):e58036. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58036. eCollection 2024 Apr.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.58036
PMID:38738053
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11088474/
Abstract

Background Transradial access (TRA) is a medical procedure primarily used for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and cardiac catheterization. Based on the recently published Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of AngioX (MATRIX) trial, TRA is being used more frequently than transfemoral access (TFA) since it has reduced rates of bleeding and fatality. A structural complication of TRA is radial artery occlusion (RAO), which may cause temporary pain to limit TRA in the future. Objective This study aimed to investigate the onset and risk factors of RAO following TRA for coronary interventions. Material and methods An observational study was conducted at Fauji Foundation Hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan. The study included 1,680 patients recruited between April 2021 to December 2023. Fifty-eight patients were lost to follow-up, while another 95 patients did not come for a visit within the study period. The final study, therefore, included 1,527 patients. Results The mean age of patients was 58.09 ± 8.07 years. Patients were divided into two age groups (greater or less than 60 years). Diagnostic angiograms were completed for 955 patients, while 572 also underwent PCI. The overall RAO onset was 81 (5.3%). There was a significantly higher RAO onset in patients over 60 years old (7.1 vs 3.8%, p = 0.003). Conclusion Overall, the risk of RAO is low following TRA. The risk of RAO is significantly higher in people aged over 60 years.

摘要

背景 经桡动脉入路(TRA)是一种主要用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和心导管检查的医疗程序。根据最近发表的《通过经桡动脉入路部位和血管造影X系统的全身实施来最小化不良出血事件》(MATRIX)试验,TRA的使用频率比经股动脉入路(TFA)更高,因为它降低了出血和死亡率。TRA的一种结构性并发症是桡动脉闭塞(RAO),这可能会导致暂时性疼痛,从而限制未来TRA的使用。目的 本研究旨在调查冠状动脉介入治疗经TRA后RAO的发生情况及危险因素。材料与方法 在巴基斯坦白沙瓦的法吉基金会医院进行了一项观察性研究。该研究纳入了2021年4月至2023年12月期间招募的1680例患者。58例患者失访,另有95例患者在研究期间未前来就诊。因此,最终研究纳入了1527例患者。结果 患者的平均年龄为58.09±8.07岁。患者被分为两个年龄组(大于或小于60岁)。955例患者完成了诊断性血管造影,572例患者还接受了PCI。RAO的总体发生率为81例(5.3%)。60岁以上患者的RAO发生率显著更高(7.1%对3.8%,p=0.003)。结论 总体而言,经TRA后RAO的风险较低。60岁以上人群RAO的风险显著更高。