Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK (MVDP, VW, DB).
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):470-480. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241249654. Epub 2024 May 13.
Willingness-to-pay (WTP) estimates are useful to policy makers only if they are generalizable beyond the moment when they are collected. To understand the "shelf life" of preference estimates, preference stability needs be tested over substantial periods of time.
We tested the stability of WTP for preventative dental care (scale and polish) using a payment-card contingent valuation question administered to 909 randomized controlled trial participants at 4 time points: baseline (prerandomization) and at annual intervals for 3 years. Trial participants were regular attenders at National Health Service dental practices. Participants were randomly offered different frequencies (intensities) of scale polish (no scale and polish, 1 scale and polish per year, 2 scale and polishes per year). We also examined whether treatment allocation to these different treatment intensities influenced the stability of WTP. Interval regression methods were used to test for changes in WTP over time while controlling for changes in 2 determinants of WTP. Individual-level changes were also examined as well as the WTP function over time.
We found that at the aggregate level, mean WTP values were stable over time. The results were similar by trial arm. Individuals allocated to the arm with the highest scale and polish intensity (2 per year) had a slight increase in WTP toward the latter part of the trial. There was considerable variation at the individual level. The WTP function was stable over time.
The payment-card contingent valuation method can produce stable WTP values in health over time. Future research should explore the generalizability of these results in other populations, for less familiar health care services, and using alternative elicitation methods.
Stated preferences are commonly used to value health care.Willingness-to-pay (WTP) estimates are useful only if they have a "shelf life."Little is known about the stability of WTP for health care.We test the stability of WTP for dental care over 3 y.Our results show that the contingent valuation method can produce stable WTP values.
只有当支付意愿(WTP)估计值能够推广到收集它们的时刻之外,它们才对政策制定者有用。为了了解偏好估计的“保质期”,需要在相当长的时间内测试偏好稳定性。
我们使用支付卡条件价值评估问题测试了预防性牙科护理(洗牙和抛光)的 WTP 稳定性,该问题在 4 个时间点向 909 名随机对照试验参与者进行了调查:基线(随机分组前)和 3 年内每年一次。试验参与者是国家卫生服务牙科诊所的定期就诊者。参与者随机提供了不同频率(强度)的洗牙和抛光(不洗牙和抛光、每年 1 次洗牙和抛光、每年 2 次洗牙和抛光)。我们还检查了对这些不同治疗强度的治疗分配是否影响 WTP 的稳定性。使用间隔回归方法测试了随着时间的推移 WTP 的变化,同时控制了 WTP 的两个决定因素的变化。还检查了个体水平的变化以及随着时间的推移 WTP 函数。
我们发现,在总体水平上,WTP 值随时间保持稳定。按试验臂的结果相似。分配到洗牙和抛光强度最高(每年 2 次)的手臂的个体在试验的后期对 WTP 略有增加。个体水平存在很大差异。WTP 函数随时间保持稳定。
支付卡条件价值评估方法可以在健康方面随时间产生稳定的 WTP 值。未来的研究应在其他人群中探索这些结果的可推广性,对于不太熟悉的医疗保健服务,并使用替代 elicitation 方法。
陈述偏好常用于评估医疗保健。只有当支付意愿(WTP)估计值具有“保质期”时,它们才有用。对于医疗保健的 WTP 稳定性知之甚少。我们测试了 3 年来对牙科护理的 WTP 稳定性。我们的结果表明,条件价值评估方法可以产生稳定的 WTP 值。