Division of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Aug;118(2):496-503. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.04.021. Epub 2024 May 11.
We sought to characterize the association between venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) bridging duration and outcomes in patients listed for lung transplantation.
A retrospective observational study was conducted using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) database to identify adults (aged ≥18 years) who were listed for lung transplantation between 2016 and 2020 and were bridged with VV-ECMO. Patients were then stratified into groups, determined by risk inflection points, depending on the amount of time spent on pretransplant ECMO: group 1 (≤5 days), group 2 (6-10 days), group 3 (11-20 days), and group 4 (>20 days). Waiting list survival between groups was analyzed using Fine-Gray competing risk models. Posttransplant survival was compared using Cox regression.
Of 566 eligible VV-ECMO bridge-to-lung-transplant patients (median age, 54 years, 49% men), 174 (31%), 124 (22%), 130 (23%), and 138 (24%) were categorized as groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Overall, median duration of VV-ECMO was 10 days (interquartile range, 1-211 days), and 178 patients (31%) died on the waiting list. In the Fine-Gray model, compared with group 1, patients bridged with longer ECMO durations in group 2 (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 2.95; 95% CI, 1.63-5.35), group 3 (SHR, 3.96; 95% CI, 2.36-6.63), and group 4 (SHR, 4.33; 95% CI, 2.59-7.22, all P < .001) were more likely to die on the waiting list. Of 388 patients receiving a transplant, pretransplant ECMO duration was not associated with 1-year survival in Cox regression.
Prolonged duration of ECMO bridging was associated with worse waiting list mortality but did not impact survival after lung transplant. Prioritization of very early transplantation may improve waiting list outcomes in this population.
本研究旨在描述接受静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV-ECMO)桥接治疗的患者的桥接时间与结局之间的关系。
本回顾性观察性研究使用器官获取和移植网络(OPTN)数据库,纳入 2016 年至 2020 年期间接受肺移植并接受 VV-ECMO 桥接治疗的成年患者(年龄≥18 岁)。然后,根据术前 ECMO 时间的风险拐点,将患者分为 4 组:组 1(≤5 天)、组 2(6-10 天)、组 3(11-20 天)和组 4(>20 天)。使用 Fine-Gray 竞争风险模型分析各组间的等待名单生存率。使用 Cox 回归比较移植后的生存率。
在 566 名符合条件的 VV-ECMO 桥接肺移植患者中(中位年龄 54 岁,49%为男性),174 名(31%)、124 名(22%)、130 名(23%)和 138 名(24%)患者分别归入组 1、2、3 和 4。总体而言,VV-ECMO 的中位时间为 10 天(四分位间距,1-211 天),178 名患者(31%)在等待名单上死亡。在 Fine-Gray 模型中,与组 1 相比,组 2(亚分布危险比 [SHR],2.95;95%CI,1.63-5.35)、组 3(SHR,3.96;95%CI,2.36-6.63)和组 4(SHR,4.33;95%CI,2.59-7.22,均 P<0.001)的患者 ECMO 桥接时间更长,等待名单死亡的可能性更高。在 388 名接受移植的患者中,Cox 回归分析显示术前 ECMO 时间与 1 年生存率无关。
ECMO 桥接时间延长与等待名单死亡率增加相关,但不影响肺移植后的生存率。在该人群中优先进行早期移植可能会改善等待名单的结局。